forked from OSchip/llvm-project
Warn on explicit copy constructors.
Summary: The Google C++ Style Guide doesn't require copy constructors to be declared explicit, but some people do this by mistake. Make this check detect and fix such cases. Reviewers: djasper Reviewed By: djasper Subscribers: cfe-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3541 llvm-svn: 207531
This commit is contained in:
parent
4418dda5ef
commit
014225e11e
|
|
@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
|
|||
#include "clang/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchFinder.h"
|
||||
#include "clang/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchers.h"
|
||||
#include "clang/Frontend/CompilerInstance.h"
|
||||
#include "clang/Lex/Lexer.h"
|
||||
#include "clang/Lex/PPCallbacks.h"
|
||||
#include "clang/Lex/Preprocessor.h"
|
||||
#include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h"
|
||||
|
|
@ -28,16 +29,58 @@ void ExplicitConstructorCheck::registerMatchers(MatchFinder *Finder) {
|
|||
Finder->addMatcher(constructorDecl().bind("ctor"), this);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Looks for the token matching the predicate and returns the range of the found
|
||||
// token including trailing whitespace.
|
||||
SourceRange FindToken(const SourceManager &Sources, LangOptions LangOpts,
|
||||
SourceLocation StartLoc, SourceLocation EndLoc,
|
||||
bool (*Pred)(const Token &)) {
|
||||
FileID File = Sources.getFileID(Sources.getSpellingLoc(StartLoc));
|
||||
StringRef Buf = Sources.getBufferData(File);
|
||||
const char *StartChar = Sources.getCharacterData(StartLoc);
|
||||
Lexer Lex(StartLoc, LangOpts, StartChar, StartChar, Buf.end());
|
||||
Lex.SetCommentRetentionState(true);
|
||||
Token Tok;
|
||||
do {
|
||||
Lex.LexFromRawLexer(Tok);
|
||||
if (Pred(Tok)) {
|
||||
Token NextTok;
|
||||
Lex.LexFromRawLexer(NextTok);
|
||||
return SourceRange(Tok.getLocation(), NextTok.getLocation());
|
||||
}
|
||||
} while (Tok.isNot(tok::eof) && Tok.getLocation() < EndLoc);
|
||||
|
||||
return SourceRange();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void ExplicitConstructorCheck::check(const MatchFinder::MatchResult &Result) {
|
||||
const CXXConstructorDecl *Ctor =
|
||||
Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<CXXConstructorDecl>("ctor");
|
||||
// Do not be confused: isExplicit means 'explicit' keyword is present,
|
||||
// isImplicit means that it's a compiler-generated constructor.
|
||||
if (Ctor->isOutOfLine() || Ctor->isExplicit() || Ctor->isImplicit() ||
|
||||
Ctor->isDeleted() || Ctor->isCopyOrMoveConstructor())
|
||||
if (Ctor->isOutOfLine() || Ctor->isImplicit() || Ctor->isDeleted())
|
||||
return;
|
||||
if (Ctor->getNumParams() == 0 || Ctor->getMinRequiredArguments() > 1)
|
||||
|
||||
if (Ctor->isExplicit() && Ctor->isCopyOrMoveConstructor()) {
|
||||
auto isKWExplicit = [](const Token &Tok) {
|
||||
return Tok.is(tok::raw_identifier) &&
|
||||
StringRef(Tok.getRawIdentifierData(), Tok.getLength()) ==
|
||||
"explicit";
|
||||
};
|
||||
SourceRange ExplicitTokenRange =
|
||||
FindToken(*Result.SourceManager, Result.Context->getLangOpts(),
|
||||
Ctor->getOuterLocStart(), Ctor->getLocEnd(), isKWExplicit);
|
||||
if (ExplicitTokenRange.isValid()) {
|
||||
DiagnosticBuilder Diag = diag(ExplicitTokenRange.getBegin(),
|
||||
"Copy constructor declared explicit.");
|
||||
Diag << FixItHint::CreateRemoval(
|
||||
CharSourceRange::getCharRange(ExplicitTokenRange));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (Ctor->isExplicit() || Ctor->isCopyOrMoveConstructor() ||
|
||||
Ctor->getNumParams() == 0 || Ctor->getMinRequiredArguments() > 1)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
SourceLocation Loc = Ctor->getLocation();
|
||||
diag(Loc, "Single-argument constructors must be explicit")
|
||||
<< FixItHint::CreateInsertion(Loc, "explicit ");
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -37,6 +37,16 @@ TEST(ExplicitConstructorCheckTest, OutOfLineDefinitions) {
|
|||
"class C { C(int i); }; C::C(int i) {}"));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
TEST(ExplicitConstructorCheckTest, RemoveExplicit) {
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ("class A { A(const A&); };\n"
|
||||
"class B { /*asdf*/ B(const B&); };\n"
|
||||
"class C { /*asdf*/ C(const C&); };",
|
||||
runCheckOnCode<ExplicitConstructorCheck>(
|
||||
"class A { explicit A(const A&); };\n"
|
||||
"class B { explicit /*asdf*/ B(const B&); };\n"
|
||||
"class C { explicit/*asdf*/ C(const C&); };"));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
} // namespace test
|
||||
} // namespace tidy
|
||||
} // namespace clang
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue