Warn on explicit copy constructors.

Summary:
The Google C++ Style Guide doesn't require copy constructors to be
declared explicit, but some people do this by mistake. Make this check detect
and fix such cases.

Reviewers: djasper

Reviewed By: djasper

Subscribers: cfe-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3541

llvm-svn: 207531
This commit is contained in:
Alexander Kornienko 2014-04-29 15:07:08 +00:00
parent 4418dda5ef
commit 014225e11e
2 changed files with 56 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
#include "clang/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchFinder.h"
#include "clang/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchers.h"
#include "clang/Frontend/CompilerInstance.h"
#include "clang/Lex/Lexer.h"
#include "clang/Lex/PPCallbacks.h"
#include "clang/Lex/Preprocessor.h"
#include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h"
@ -28,16 +29,58 @@ void ExplicitConstructorCheck::registerMatchers(MatchFinder *Finder) {
Finder->addMatcher(constructorDecl().bind("ctor"), this);
}
// Looks for the token matching the predicate and returns the range of the found
// token including trailing whitespace.
SourceRange FindToken(const SourceManager &Sources, LangOptions LangOpts,
SourceLocation StartLoc, SourceLocation EndLoc,
bool (*Pred)(const Token &)) {
FileID File = Sources.getFileID(Sources.getSpellingLoc(StartLoc));
StringRef Buf = Sources.getBufferData(File);
const char *StartChar = Sources.getCharacterData(StartLoc);
Lexer Lex(StartLoc, LangOpts, StartChar, StartChar, Buf.end());
Lex.SetCommentRetentionState(true);
Token Tok;
do {
Lex.LexFromRawLexer(Tok);
if (Pred(Tok)) {
Token NextTok;
Lex.LexFromRawLexer(NextTok);
return SourceRange(Tok.getLocation(), NextTok.getLocation());
}
} while (Tok.isNot(tok::eof) && Tok.getLocation() < EndLoc);
return SourceRange();
}
void ExplicitConstructorCheck::check(const MatchFinder::MatchResult &Result) {
const CXXConstructorDecl *Ctor =
Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<CXXConstructorDecl>("ctor");
// Do not be confused: isExplicit means 'explicit' keyword is present,
// isImplicit means that it's a compiler-generated constructor.
if (Ctor->isOutOfLine() || Ctor->isExplicit() || Ctor->isImplicit() ||
Ctor->isDeleted() || Ctor->isCopyOrMoveConstructor())
if (Ctor->isOutOfLine() || Ctor->isImplicit() || Ctor->isDeleted())
return;
if (Ctor->getNumParams() == 0 || Ctor->getMinRequiredArguments() > 1)
if (Ctor->isExplicit() && Ctor->isCopyOrMoveConstructor()) {
auto isKWExplicit = [](const Token &Tok) {
return Tok.is(tok::raw_identifier) &&
StringRef(Tok.getRawIdentifierData(), Tok.getLength()) ==
"explicit";
};
SourceRange ExplicitTokenRange =
FindToken(*Result.SourceManager, Result.Context->getLangOpts(),
Ctor->getOuterLocStart(), Ctor->getLocEnd(), isKWExplicit);
if (ExplicitTokenRange.isValid()) {
DiagnosticBuilder Diag = diag(ExplicitTokenRange.getBegin(),
"Copy constructor declared explicit.");
Diag << FixItHint::CreateRemoval(
CharSourceRange::getCharRange(ExplicitTokenRange));
}
}
if (Ctor->isExplicit() || Ctor->isCopyOrMoveConstructor() ||
Ctor->getNumParams() == 0 || Ctor->getMinRequiredArguments() > 1)
return;
SourceLocation Loc = Ctor->getLocation();
diag(Loc, "Single-argument constructors must be explicit")
<< FixItHint::CreateInsertion(Loc, "explicit ");

View File

@ -37,6 +37,16 @@ TEST(ExplicitConstructorCheckTest, OutOfLineDefinitions) {
"class C { C(int i); }; C::C(int i) {}"));
}
TEST(ExplicitConstructorCheckTest, RemoveExplicit) {
EXPECT_EQ("class A { A(const A&); };\n"
"class B { /*asdf*/ B(const B&); };\n"
"class C { /*asdf*/ C(const C&); };",
runCheckOnCode<ExplicitConstructorCheck>(
"class A { explicit A(const A&); };\n"
"class B { explicit /*asdf*/ B(const B&); };\n"
"class C { explicit/*asdf*/ C(const C&); };"));
}
} // namespace test
} // namespace tidy
} // namespace clang