diff --git a/libcxx/www/upcoming_meeting.html b/libcxx/www/upcoming_meeting.html
index 56fa383aa2c5..34bb822b2e52 100644
--- a/libcxx/www/upcoming_meeting.html
+++ b/libcxx/www/upcoming_meeting.html
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@
 	<tr><td><a href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2579">2579</a></td><td>Inconsistency wrt Allocators in <tt>basic_string</tt> assignment vs. <tt>basic_string::assign</tt></td><td>Jacksonville</td><td><i>Patch Ready</i></td></tr>
 	<tr><td><a href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2581">2581</a></td><td>Specialization of <tt>&lt;type_traits&gt;</tt> variable templates should be prohibited</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
 	<tr><td><a href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2582">2582</a></td><td>&sect;[res.on.functions]/2's prohibition against incomplete types shouldn't apply to type traits</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
-	<tr><td><a href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2583">2583</a></td><td>There is no way to supply an allocator for <tt>basic_string(str, pos)</tt></td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
+	<tr><td><a href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2583">2583</a></td><td>There is no way to supply an allocator for <tt>basic_string(str, pos)</tt></td><td>Jacksonville</td><td><i>Patch Ready</i></td></tr>
 	<tr><td><a href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2585">2585</a></td><td><tt>forward_list::resize(size_type, const value_type&amp;)</tt> effects incorrect</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
 	<tr><td><a href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2586">2586</a></td><td>Wrong value category used in <tt>scoped_allocator_adaptor::construct()</tt></td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
 	<tr><td><a href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2590">2590</a></td><td>Aggregate initialization for <tt>std::array</tt></td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
@@ -114,16 +114,16 @@
 <li>2575 - I don't think we ever implemented this; so 'removing' it is trivial</li>
 <li>2576 - This one is simple, but testing it will be hard. I tried making a sublass of istringstream, but it got sliced.</li>
 <li>2577 - This one is simple</li>
-<li>2579 - Done.</li>
+<li>2579 - <i>Done</i></li>
 <li>2581 - </li>
 <li>2582 - </li>
-<li>2583 - This looks easy.</li>
+<li>2583 - <i>Done</i></li>
 <li>2585 - This looks easy.</li>
 <li>2586 - </li>
 <li>2590 - </li>
 </ul>
 
-<p>Last Updated: 16-Feb-2015</p>
+<p>Last Updated: 23-Feb-2015</p>
 </div>
 </body>
 </html>