When we ship LLVM 16, <ranges> won't be considered experimental anymore.
We might as well do this sooner rather than later.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132151
Uncomment the tests to ensure `std::ranges::rbegin` and friends are indeed
customization points objects.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126325
`std::views::drops` and `std::views::join` have been implemented, but the tests
verifying the CPOs for them are still commented out. Uncomment the tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125618
This only adds the customization point object (which isn't pipeable),
the view itself has already been implemented previously.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124978
Note that this class was called just `split_view` in the original One
Ranges Proposal and was renamed to `lazy_split_view` by
[P2210](https://wg21.link/p2210).
Co-authored-by: zoecarver <z.zoelec2@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107500
All supported compilers that support C++20 now support concepts. So, remove
`_LIB_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS` in favor of `_LIBCPP_STD_VER > 17`. Similarly in
the tests, remove `// UNSUPPORTED: libcpp-no-concepts`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121528
The tests for these are just copy-pasted from the tests for std::{strong,weak,partial}_order,
and then I added an extra clause in each (test_2()) to test the stuff that's not just the same
as std::*_order.
This also includes the fix for https://wg21.link/LWG3465 (which falls naturally out of the
"you must write it three times" style, but I've added test cases for it also).
There is an action item here to go back and give good diagnostics for SFINAE failures
in these CPOs. I've filed this as https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53456 .
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111514
This will detect if someone writes `inline auto cpo =` instead of
`inline constexpr auto cpo =`. I don't know how that'd be possible,
but it's easy to test, so let's test it.
Add test for various customization point object properties as defined by
the Standard. Test various CPOs from `<ranges>`, `<iterator>`,
`<concepts>`, etc.
The test is mostly from https://reviews.llvm.org/D107036 and split up
into this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115588
Louis Dionne