AIX's system header provides these C++ overloads for compatibility with
older XL C++ implementations, but they can be disabled by defining
__LIBC_NO_CPP_MATH_OVERLOADS__ since AIX 7.2 TL 5 SP 3.
Since D109078 landed clang will define this macro when using libc++ on
AIX and we already run the lit tests with it too. This change will
enable the overloads in libc++'s math.h and we'll continue to require
the compiler to define the macro going forward.
Reviewed By: ldionne, jsji, EricWF
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102172
co-authored-by: Jason Liu <jasonliu.development@gmail.com>
Line 1140 is a duplicate of line 1119; it tests the two-argument version
of std::hypot, whereas all the lines in this section are supposed to be
testing the C++17 three-argument version. Remove the erroneous duplicated line.
Split out of D116295.
This changes adds the pipeline config for both 32-bit and 64-bit AIX targets. As well, we add a lit feature `LIBCXX-AIX-FIXME` which is used to mark the failing tests which remain to be investigated on AIX, so that the CI produces a clean build.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111359
Summary:
All overloads of `::abs` and `std::abs` must be present in both `<cmath>` and `<cstdlib>`. This is problematic to implement because C defines `fabs` in `math.h` and `labs` in `stdlib.h`. This introduces a circular dependency between the two headers.
This patch implements that requirement by moving `abs` into `math.h` and making `stdlib.h` include `math.h`. In order to get the underlying C declarations from the "real" `stdlib.h` inside our `math.h` we need some trickery. Specifically we need to make `stdlib.h` include next itself.
Suggestions for a cleaner implementation are welcome.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, ldionne
Reviewed By: ldionne
Subscribers: krytarowski, fedor.sergeev, dexonsmith, jdoerfert, jsji, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60097
llvm-svn: 359020
Summary:
Freestanding is *weird*. The standard allows it to differ in a bunch of odd
manners from regular C++, and the committee would like to improve that
situation. I'd like to make libc++ behave better with what freestanding should
be, so that it can be a tool we use in improving the standard. To do that we
need to try stuff out, both with "freestanding the language mode" and
"freestanding the library subset".
Let's start with the super basic: run the libc++ tests in freestanding, using
clang as the compiler, and see what works. The easiest hack to do this:
In utils/libcxx/test/config.py add:
self.cxx.compile_flags += ['-ffreestanding']
Run the tests and they all fail.
Why? Because in freestanding `main` isn't special. This "not special" property
has two effects: main doesn't get mangled, and main isn't allowed to omit its
`return` statement. The first means main gets mangled and the linker can't
create a valid executable for us to test. The second means we spew out warnings
(ew) and the compiler doesn't insert the `return` we omitted, and main just
falls of the end and does whatever undefined behavior (if you're luck, ud2
leading to non-zero return code).
Let's start my work with the basics. This patch changes all libc++ tests to
declare `main` as `int main(int, char**` so it mangles consistently (enabling us
to declare another `extern "C"` main for freestanding which calls the mangled
one), and adds `return 0;` to all places where it was missing. This touches 6124
files, and I apologize.
The former was done with The Magic Of Sed.
The later was done with a (not quite correct but decent) clang tool:
https://gist.github.com/jfbastien/793819ff360baa845483dde81170feed
This works for most tests, though I did have to adjust a few places when e.g.
the test runs with `-x c`, macros are used for main (such as for the filesystem
tests), etc.
Once this is in we can create a freestanding bot which will prevent further
regressions. After that, we can start the real work of supporting C++
freestanding fairly well in libc++.
<rdar://problem/47754795>
Reviewers: ldionne, mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, arphaman, miyuki, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57624
llvm-svn: 353086
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351648
When using an old version of glibc, a ::isinf(double) and ::isnan(double)
function is provided, rather than just the macro required by C and C++.
Displace this function using _LIBCPP_PREFERRED_OVERLOAD where possible.
The only remaining case where we should get the wrong return type is now
glibc + libc++ + a non-clang compiler.
llvm-svn: 331241
For std::isinf, the standard requires effectively calling isinf as
double from Libc for integral types. But integral types are never
infinite; we don't need to call Libc to return false.
Also short-circuit other functions where Libc won't have interesting
answers: signbit, fpclassify, isfinite, isnan, and isnormal.
I added correctness tests for integral types since we're no longer
deferring to Libc.
In review it was pointed out that in future revisions of the C++
standard we may add more types to std::is_arithmetic (e.g.,
std::is_fixed_point). I'll leave it to a future commit to hack this to
allow using math functions on those. We'll need to change things like
__libcpp_fpclassify anyway, so I'm not sure anything here would really
be future-proof.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D31561
rdar://problem/31361223
llvm-svn: 301060
Summary:
GLIBC recently removed the incorrect `int isinf(double)` and `int isnan(double)` overloads in C++11 and greater. This causes previously `XFAIL: linux` tests to start passing.
Since there is no longer a way to 'XFAIL' the tests I choose to simply tolerate this bug.
See https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19439
Reviewers: rsmith, mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: jroelofs, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19835
llvm-svn: 271060
Nikolas Klauser