Commit Graph

12 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Louis Dionne b8cb1dc9ea [libc++] Make <ranges> non-experimental
When we ship LLVM 16, <ranges> won't be considered experimental anymore.
We might as well do this sooner rather than later.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132151
2022-08-18 16:59:58 -04:00
Joe Loser d2baefae68
[libc++] Replace _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS with _LIBCPP_STD_VER > 17. NFCI.
All supported compilers that support C++20 now support concepts. So, remove
`_LIB_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS` in favor of `_LIBCPP_STD_VER > 17`. Similarly in
the tests, remove `// UNSUPPORTED: libcpp-no-concepts`.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121528
2022-03-13 12:32:06 -04:00
Mark de Wever 5f26d8636f [libc++] Removes base member from tests.
Change the tests to use the base friend function instead of members.
Also changed some types to have a base friends instead of members.

Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne, Quuxplusone

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120742
2022-03-03 21:46:04 +01:00
Arthur O'Dwyer 7bdf41653c [libc++] Remove conditional noexcepts from view_interface.
As suggested in D117966.
These conditional noexcepts are *permitted* by the Standard (as long
as there were no mistakes in them, I guess); but not *mandated*.
The Standard doesn't put any noexcept-specifications on these member functions.
The same logic would apply to `transform_view::iterator::operator*`
and `transform_view::iterator::operator[]`, but the Standard mandates
conditional noexcept on `iter_move(transform_view::iterator)`, and
I think it doesn't make much sense to say "moving from this iterator
is conditionally noexcept but not-moving from it is noexcept(false),"
so I'm leaving transform_view alone for now.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119374
2022-02-15 11:12:42 -05:00
Casey Carter c93a531cae [libcxx][test] tests for strengthened `noexcept` are non-portable
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117966
2022-02-08 14:54:13 -08:00
Joe Loser 2513b79030
[libc++] Implement LWG3549: view_interface need not inherit from view_base
Implement LWG3549 by making `view_interface` not inherit from `view_base`. Types
are still views if they have a public and unambiguous derivation from
`view_interface`, so adjust the `enable_view` machinery as such to account for
that.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117714
2022-01-22 22:52:46 -05:00
Casey Carter b8d38e8b4f [libcxx][test] view_interface need not derive from view_base
... after LWG-3549.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117608
2022-01-20 12:17:10 -08:00
Joe Loser c3cd5f5b4f
[libc++][test] Fix invalid test for views::view_interface
The type `MoveOnlyForwardRange` violates the precondition stated in
`view.interface.general`. Specifically, the type passed to
`view_interface` shall model the `view` concept. In turn, this requires the
type to satisfy `movable` concept (and others), but this type
`MoveOnlyForwardRange` does not satisfy the `movable` concept.

Add a move assignment operator so that `MoveOnlyForwardRange` satisfies the
`movable` concept. While we're here, ensure the neighboring types that inherit
from `view_interface` also satisfy the `view` concept to avoid similar issues.

Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50720

Reviewed By: Quuxplusone, Mordante, #libc

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112631
2021-10-27 17:12:42 -04:00
Louis Dionne 6900df37d2 [libc++] Remove Lit annotations for unsupported GCC versions from the test suite
Since we officially don't support several older compilers now, we can
drop a lot of the markup in the test suite. This helps keep the test
suite simple and makes sure that UNSUPPORTED annotations don't rot.

This is the first patch of a series that will remove annotations for
compilers that are now unsupported.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107787
2021-08-12 13:30:47 -04:00
Mark de Wever 71909de374 [libc++] Disable incomplete library features.
Adds a new CMake option to disable the usage of incomplete headers.
These incomplete headers are not guaranteed to be ABI stable. This
option is intended to be used by vendors so they can avoid their users
from code that's not ready for production usage.

The option is enabled by default.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106763
2021-07-27 22:37:35 +02:00
Arthur O'Dwyer 389e749c42 [libc++] [test] Fix some GCC 11 errors/warnings in these tests. NFCI.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104228
2021-06-15 08:37:32 -04:00
zoecarver 5671ff20d9 [libcxx] Implement view.interface.
This will unblock work on ranges::view. Based on D101396.

Refs http://eel.is/c++draft/view.interface.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101737
2021-06-01 12:34:47 -07:00