There are several places in the code that are currently broken as
they assume an Instruction always has a parent Function when
attempting to get the vscale_range attribute. This patch adds checks
that an Instruction has a parent.
I've added a test for a parentless @llvm.vscale intrinsic call here:
unittests/Analysis/ValueTrackingTest.cpp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110158
isValidAssumeForContext can provide better results with access to the
dominator tree in some cases. This patch adjusts computeConstantRange to
allow passing through a dominator tree.
The use VectorCombine is updated to pass through the DT to enable
additional scalarization.
Note that similar APIs like computeKnownBits already accept optional dominator
tree arguments.
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110175
In ValueTracking.cpp we use a function called
computeKnownBitsFromOperator to determine the known bits of a value.
For the vscale intrinsic if the function contains the vscale_range
attribute we can use the maximum and minimum values of vscale to
determine some known zero and one bits. This should help to improve
code quality by allowing certain optimisations to take place.
Tests added here:
Transforms/InstCombine/icmp-vscale.ll
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109883
This renames the primary methods for creating a zero value to `getZero`
instead of `getNullValue` and renames predicates like `isAllOnesValue`
to simply `isAllOnes`. This achieves two things:
1) This starts standardizing predicates across the LLVM codebase,
following (in this case) ConstantInt. The word "Value" doesn't
convey anything of merit, and is missing in some of the other things.
2) Calling an integer "null" doesn't make any sense. The original sin
here is mine and I've regretted it for years. This moves us to calling
it "zero" instead, which is correct!
APInt is widely used and I don't think anyone is keen to take massive source
breakage on anything so core, at least not all in one go. As such, this
doesn't actually delete any entrypoints, it "soft deprecates" them with a
comment.
Included in this patch are changes to a bunch of the codebase, but there are
more. We should normalize SelectionDAG and other APIs as well, which would
make the API change more mechanical.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109483
This is already done within InstCombine:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/MiGE22
...but leaving it out of analysis makes it
harder to avoid infinite loops there.
This is already done within InstCombine:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/MiGE22
...but leaving it out of analysis makes it
harder to avoid infinite loops there.
ValueTracking should allow for value ranges that may satisfy
llvm.assume, instead of restricting the ranges only to values that
will always satisfy the condition.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107298
Proposed alternative to D105338.
This is ugly, but short-term I think it's the best way forward: first,
let's formalize the hacks into a coherent model. Then we can consider
extensions of that model (we could have different flavors of volatile
with different rules).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106309
This replaces the current ad-hoc implementation,
by syncing the code from InstCombine's implementation in `InstCombinerImpl::visitUnreachableInst()`,
with one exception that here in SimplifyCFG we are allowed to remove EH instructions.
Effectively, this now allows SimplifyCFG to remove calls (iff they won't throw and will return),
arithmetic/logic operations, etc.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105374
This borrows as much as possible from the SDAG version of the code
(originally added with D27129 and since updated with big endian support).
In IR, we can test more easily for correctness than we did in the
original patch. I'm using the simplest cases that I could find for
InstSimplify: we computeKnownBits on variable shift amounts to see if
they are zero or in range. So shuffle constant elements into a vector,
cast it, and shift it.
The motivating x86 example from https://llvm.org/PR50123 is also here.
We computeKnownBits in the caller code, but we only check if the shift
amount is in range. That could be enhanced to catch the 2nd x86 test -
if the shift amount is known too big, the result is 0.
Alive2 understands the datalayout and agrees that the tests here are
correct - example:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/KZJFMZ
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104472
This was reverted because of a reported problem. It turned out this patch didn't introduce said problem, it just exposed it more widely. 15a4233 fixes the root issue, so this simple a) rebases over that, and b) adds a much more extensive comment explaining why that weakened assert is correct.
Original commit message follows:
Follow up to D99912, specifically the revert, fix, and reapply thereof.
This generalizes the invertible recurrence logic in two ways:
* By allowing mismatching operand numbers of the phi, we can recurse through a pair of phi recurrences whose operand orders have not been canonicalized.
* By allowing recurrences through operand 1, we can invert these odd (but legal) recurrence.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100884
There's a TODO comment in the code and discussion in D99912
about generalizing this, but I wasn't sure how to implement that,
so just going with a potential minimal fix to avoid crashing.
The test is a reduction beyond useful code (there's no user of
%user...), but it is based on https://llvm.org/PR50191, so this
is asserting on real code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101772
This update supports the following transformation:
```
select(extract(mul_with_overflow(a, _), _), (a == 0), false)
=>
and(extract(mul_with_overflow(a, _), _), (a == 0))
```
which is correct because if `a` was poison the select's condition was
also poison.
This update is splitted from D101423.
The current code can scan an unlimited number of instructions,
if the containing basic block is very large. The test case from
PR50155 contains a basic block with approximately 100k instructions.
To avoid this, limit the number of instructions we inspect. At
the same time, drop the limit on the number of basic blocks, as
this will be implicitly limited by the number of instructions as
well.
This seems like a reasonable upper bound on VL. WG discussions for
the V spec would probably allow us to use 2^16 as an upper bound
on VLEN, but this is good enough for now.
This allows us to remove sext and zext if user happens to assign
the size_t result into an int and then uses it as a VL intrinsic
argument which is size_t.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck, rogfer01, arcbbb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101472
Follow up to D99912, specifically the revert, fix, and reapply thereof.
This generalizes the invertible recurrence logic in two ways:
* By allowing mismatching operand numbers of the phi, we can recurse through a pair of phi recurrences whose operand orders have not been canonicalized.
* By allowing recurrences through operand 1, we can invert these odd (but legal) recurrence.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100884
I'd reverted this in commit 3b6acb1797 due to buildbot failures. This patch contains the fix for said issue. I'd forgotten to handle the case where two phis in the same block have different operand order. We canonicalize away from this, but it's still valid IR. The tests included in this change (as opposed to simply having test output changed), crashed without the fix.
Original commit message follows...
This extends the phi handling in isKnownNonEqual with a special case based on invertible recurrences. If we can prove the recurrence is invertible (which many common ones are), we can recurse through the start operands of the recurrence skipping the phi cycle.
(Side note: Instcombine currently does not push back through these cases. I will implement that in a follow up change w/separate review.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99912
This extends the phi handling in isKnownNonEqual with a special case based on invertible recurrences. If we can prove the recurrence is invertible (which many common ones are), we can recurse through the start operands of the recurrence skipping the phi cycle.
(Side note: Instcombine currently does not push back through these cases. I will implement that in a follow up change w/separate review.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99912
This is an alternative to D99759 to avoid the compile-time explosion seen in:
https://llvm.org/PR49785
Another potential solution would make the exclusion logic stronger to avoid
blowing up, but note that we reduced the complexity of the exclusion mechanism
in D16204 because it was too costly.
So I'm questioning the need for recursion/exclusion entirely - what is the
optimization value vs. cost of recursively computing known bits based on
assumptions?
This was built into the implementation from the start with 60db058,
and we have kept adding code/cost to deal with that capability.
By clearing the query's AssumptionCache inside computeKnownBitsFromAssume(),
this patch retains all existing assume functionality except refining known
bits based on even more assumptions.
We have 1 regression test that shows a difference in optimization power.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100573
Just like in the mul nuw case, it's sufficient that the step is
non-zero. If the step is negative, then the values will jump
between positive and negative, "crossing" zero, but the value of
the recurrence is never actually zero.
It's okay if the step is zero, we'll just stay at the same non-zero
value in that case. The valuable part of this is that the step
doesn't even need to be a constant anymore.
The start value can't be null for something to be a non-zero
recurrence, so hoist that common check out of the switch.
Subsequent checks may be incomplete or over-specified as noted in:
D100408
For use in an uncoming patch. Left out the phi case (which could otherwise fit in this framework) as it would cause infinite recursion in said patch. We can probably also leverage this in instcombine to ensure we keep the two sets of related analysis and transforms in sync.
This is a patch teaching ValueTracking that `s/u*.with.overflow` intrinsics do not
create undef/poison and they propagate poison.
I couldn't write a nice example like the one with ctpop; ValueTrackingTest.cpp were simply updated
to check these instead.
This patch helps reducing regression while fixing https://llvm.org/pr49688 .
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99671
Handle (x << s) != (y << s) where x != y and the shifts are
non-wrapping. Once again, this establishes parity with the
corresponing mul fold that already exists. The shift case is
more powerful because we don't need to guard against multiplies
by zero.
This handles the pattern X != X << C for non-zero X and C and a
non-overflowing shift. This establishes parity with the corresponing
fold for multiplies.
This is mainly for clarity: It doesn't make sense to do any
negative/positive checks when dealing with a nuw add/mul. These
only make sense to nsw add/mul.
loop:
%cmp.0 = phi i32 [ 3, %entry ], [ %inc, %loop ]
%pos.0 = phi i32 [ 1, %entry ], [ %cmp.0, %loop ]
...
%inc = add i32 %cmp.0, 1
br label %loop
On above example, %pos.0 uses previous iteration's %cmp.0 with backedge
according to PHI's instruction's defintion. If the %inc is not same among
iterations, we can say the two PHIs are not same.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98422
This is similar to the select logic just ahead of the new code.
Min/max choose exactly one value from the inputs, so if both of
those are a power-of-2, then the result must be a power-of-2.
This might help with D98152, but we likely still need other
pieces of the puzzle to avoid regressions.
The change in PatternMatch.h is needed to build with clang.
It's possible there is a better way to deal with the 'const'
incompatibities.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99276
This select of ctpop with 0 pattern can get left behind after
loop idiom recognize converts a loop to ctpop. LLVM 10 was able
to optimize this, but LLVM 11 and later is not. The difference
seems to be that some select transforms are now limited based
on canCreateUndefOrPoison.
Teaching canCreateUndefOrPoison about ctpop restores the
LLVM 10 codegen.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99207
X != X * C is true if:
* C is not 0 or 1
* X is not 0
* mul is nsw or nuw
Proof: https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/uwF29z
This is motivated by one of the cases in D98422.
Normally, this function just doesn't bother about cycles,
and hopes that the caller supplied small-enough depth
so that at worst it will take a potentially large,
but limited amount of time. But that obviously doesn't work
if there is no depth limit.
This reapples 36f1c3db66,
but without asserting, just bailout once cycle is detected.
Jeroen Dobbelaere in
https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2021-March/149206.html
is reporting that this function can end up in an endless loop
when called from SROA w/ full restrict patches.
For now, simply ensure that such problems are caught earlier/easier.
This clarifies the interface of the matchSimpleRecurrence helper introduced in 8020be0b8 for non-commutative operators. After ebd3aeba, I realized the original way I framed the routine was inconsistent. For shifts, we only matched the the LHS form, but for sub we matched both and the caller wanted that information. So, instead, we now consistently match both forms for non-commutative operators and the caller becomes responsible for filtering if needed. I tried to put a clear warning in the header because I suspect the RHS form of e.g. a sub recurrence is non-obvious for most folks. (It was for me.)
Followup to D72573 - as detailed in https://blog.regehr.org/archives/1709 we don't make use of the known leading/trailing zeros for shifted values in cases where we don't know the shift amount value.
Stop ValueTracking returning zero for poison shift patterns and use the KnownBits shift helpers directly.
Extend KnownBits::shl to combine all possible shifted combinations if both min/max shift amount values are in range.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90479
The result will have the same sign as the dividend unless the
result is 0. The magnitude of the result will always be less
than or equal to the dividend. So the result will have at least
as many sign bits as the dividend.
Previously we would do this if the divisor was a positive constant,
but that isn't required.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97170
The existing implementation was relying on order of evaluation to achieve a particular result. This got really confusing when wanting to change the handling for arguments in a later patch.
This moves the willReturn() helper from CallBase to Instruction,
so that it can be used in a more generic manner. This will make
it easier to fix additional passes (ADCE and BDCE), and will give
us one place to change if additional instructions should become
non-willreturn (e.g. there has been talk about handling volatile
operations this way).
I have also included the IntrinsicInst workaround directly in
here, so that it gets applied consistently. (As such this change
is not entirely NFC -- FuncAttrs will now use this as well.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96992
In the motivating example from https://llvm.org/PR49171 and
reduced test here, we would unroll and clone assumes so much
that compile-time effectively became infinite while analyzing
all of those assumes.
This is a follow-up of D95238's LangRef update.
This patch updates `programUndefinedIfUndefOrPoison(V)` to return true if
`V` is used by any memory-accessing instruction.
Interestingly, this affected many tests in Attributors, mainly about adding noundefs.
The tests are updated using llvm/utils/update_test_checks.py. I checked that the diffs
are about updating noundefs.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96642
The motivation for this is that I'm looking at an example that uses shifts as induction variables. There's lots of other omissions, but one of the first I noticed is that we can't compute tight known bits. (This indirectly causes SCEV's range analysis to produce very poor results as well.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96440
This is based on the example/comments in:
https://llvm.org/PR48984
I tried just lifting the restriction in computeKnownBitsFromShiftOperator()
as suggested in the bug report, but that doesn't catch all of the cases
shown here. I didn't step through to see exactly why that happened. But it
seems like a reasonable compromise to cheaply check the special-case of
shifting a constant.
There's a slight regression on a cmp transform as noted, but this is likely
the more important/common pattern, so we can fix that icmp pattern later if
needed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95959
This is similar to D94106, but for the
isGuaranteedToTransferExecutionToSuccessor() helper. We should not
assume that readonly functions will return, as this is only true for
mustprogress functions (in which case we already infer willreturn).
As with the DCE change, for now continue assuming that readonly
intrinsics will return, as not all target intrinsics have been
annotated yet.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95288
Currently LLVM is relying on ValueTracking's `isKnownNonZero` to attach `nonnull`, which can return true when the value is poison.
To make the semantics of `nonnull` consistent with the behavior of `isKnownNonZero`, this makes the semantics of `nonnull` to accept poison, and return poison if the input pointer isn't null.
This makes many transformations like below legal:
```
%p = gep inbounds %x, 1 ; % p is non-null pointer or poison
call void @f(%p) ; instcombine converts this to call void @f(nonnull %p)
```
Instead, this semantics makes propagation of `nonnull` to caller illegal.
The reason is that, passing poison to `nonnull` does not immediately raise UB anymore, so such program is still well defined, if the callee does not use the argument.
Having `noundef` attribute there re-allows this.
```
define void @f(i8* %p) { ; functionattr cannot mark %p nonnull here anymore
call void @g(i8* nonnull %p) ; .. because @g never raises UB if it never uses %p.
ret void
}
```
Another attribute that needs to be updated is `align`. This patch updates the semantics of align to accept poison as well.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90529
Just like llvm.assume, there are a lot of cases where we can just ignore llvm.experimental.noalias.scope.decl.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93042
Split impliesPoison into two recursive walks, one over V, the
other over ValAssumedPoison. This allows us to reason about poison
implications in a number of additional cases that are important
in practice. This is a generalized form of D94859, which handles
the cmp to cmp implication in particular.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94866
This patch
- Adds containsPoisonElement that checks existence of poison in constant vector elements,
- Renames containsUndefElement to containsUndefOrPoisonElement to clarify its behavior & updates its uses properly
With this patch, isGuaranteedNotToBeUndefOrPoison's tests w.r.t constant vectors are added because its analysis is improved.
Thanks!
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94053
This PR adds impliesPoison(ValAssumedPoison, V) that returns true if V is
poison under the assumption that ValAssumedPoison is poison.
For example, impliesPoison('icmp X, 10', 'icmp X, Y') return true because
'icmp X, Y' is poison if 'icmp X, 10' is poison.
impliesPoison can be used for sound optimization of select, as discussed in
D77868.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78152
Confusingly, BinaryOperator is not an Operator,
OverflowingBinaryOperator is... We were implicitly assuming that
the multiply is an Instruction here.
This fixes the assertion failure reported in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D92726#2472827.
This patch updates isImpliedCondition/isKnownNonZero to look into select form of
and/or as well.
See llvm.org/pr48353 and D93065 for more context
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93845
In 35676a4f9a I've added handling for
non-trivial dominating conditions that imply non-zero on the true
branch. This adds the same support for the false branch.
The changes in pr45360.ll change block ordering and naming, but
don't change the control flow. The urem is still guaraded by a
non-zero check correctly.
The dominating condition handling in isKnownNonZero() currently
only takes into account conditions of the form "x != 0" or "x == 0".
However, there are plenty of other conditions that imply non-zero,
a common one being "x s> 0".
Peculiarly, the handling for assumes was already dealing with more
general non-zero-ness conditions, so this just reuses the same
logic for the dominating condition case.
Build on the work started in 8f07629, and add the multiply case. In the process, more clearly describe the requirement for the operation we're looking through.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92726
The basic idea is that by looking through operand instructions which don't change the equality result that we can push the existing known bits comparison down past instructions which would obscure them.
We have analogous handling in InstSimplify for most - though weirdly not all - of these cases starting from an icmp root. It's a bit unfortunate to duplicate logic, but since my actual goal is to extend BasicAA, the icmp logic doesn't help. (And just makes it hard to test here.) The BasicAA change will be posted separately for review.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92698
This change introduces a new IR intrinsic named `llvm.pseudoprobe` for pseudo-probe block instrumentation. Please refer to https://reviews.llvm.org/D86193 for the whole story.
A pseudo probe is used to collect the execution count of the block where the probe is instrumented. This requires a pseudo probe to be persisting. The LLVM PGO instrumentation also instruments in similar places by placing a counter in the form of atomic read/write operations or runtime helper calls. While these operations are very persisting or optimization-resilient, in theory we can borrow the atomic read/write implementation from PGO counters and cut it off at the end of compilation with all the atomics converted into binary data. This was our initial design and we’ve seen promising sample correlation quality with it. However, the atomics approach has a couple issues:
1. IR Optimizations are blocked unexpectedly. Those atomic instructions are not going to be physically present in the binary code, but since they are on the IR till very end of compilation, they can still prevent certain IR optimizations and result in lower code quality.
2. The counter atomics may not be fully cleaned up from the code stream eventually.
3. Extra work is needed for re-targeting.
We choose to implement pseudo probes based on a special LLVM intrinsic, which is expected to have most of the semantics that comes with an atomic operation but does not block desired optimizations as much as possible. More specifically the semantics associated with the new intrinsic enforces a pseudo probe to be virtually executed exactly the same number of times before and after an IR optimization. The intrinsic also comes with certain flags that are carefully chosen so that the places they are probing are not going to be messed up by the optimizer while most of the IR optimizations still work. The core flags given to the special intrinsic is `IntrInaccessibleMemOnly`, which means the intrinsic accesses memory and does have a side effect so that it is not removable, but is does not access memory locations that are accessible by any original instructions. This way the intrinsic does not alias with any original instruction and thus it does not block optimizations as much as an atomic operation does. We also assign a function GUID and a block index to an intrinsic so that they are uniquely identified and not merged in order to achieve good correlation quality.
Let's now look at an example. Given the following LLVM IR:
```
define internal void @foo2(i32 %x, void (i32)* %f) !dbg !4 {
bb0:
%cmp = icmp eq i32 %x, 0
br i1 %cmp, label %bb1, label %bb2
bb1:
br label %bb3
bb2:
br label %bb3
bb3:
ret void
}
```
The instrumented IR will look like below. Note that each `llvm.pseudoprobe` intrinsic call represents a pseudo probe at a block, of which the first parameter is the GUID of the probe’s owner function and the second parameter is the probe’s ID.
```
define internal void @foo2(i32 %x, void (i32)* %f) !dbg !4 {
bb0:
%cmp = icmp eq i32 %x, 0
call void @llvm.pseudoprobe(i64 837061429793323041, i64 1)
br i1 %cmp, label %bb1, label %bb2
bb1:
call void @llvm.pseudoprobe(i64 837061429793323041, i64 2)
br label %bb3
bb2:
call void @llvm.pseudoprobe(i64 837061429793323041, i64 3)
br label %bb3
bb3:
call void @llvm.pseudoprobe(i64 837061429793323041, i64 4)
ret void
}
```
Reviewed By: wmi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86490
These are all lightweight to compute and helps avoid issues with Known being used to hold both the shift amount and then the shifted result.
Minor cleanup for D90479.
ValueTracking was using a more powerful abs() implementation. Roll
it into KnownBits::abs(). Also add an exhaustive test for abs(),
in both the poisoning and non-poisoning variants.
When computing the known bits for a GEP, don't set the nsw flag
when adding an offset to an address. The nsw flag only applies to
pure offset additions (see also D90708).
The nsw flag is only used in a very minor way by the code, to the
point that I was not able to come up with a test case where it
makes a difference.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90637
Another cleanup for D90479 - handle the Known Ones/Zeros in a single callback, which will make it much easier to jump over to the KnownBits shift handling.
We have a frequent pattern where we're merging two KnownBits to get the common/shared bits, and I just fell for the gotcha where I tried to use the & operator to merge them........
Avoid an expensive isKnownNonZero() call - this is a small cleanup before moving the extra NSW functionality from computeKnownBitsMul into KnownBits::computeForMul.
This reverts the revert commit a1b53db324.
This patch includes a fix for a reported issue, caused by
matchSelectPattern returning UMIN for selects of pointers in
some cases by looking to some connected casts.
For now, ensure integer instrinsics are only returned for selects of
ints or int vectors.
This reverts commit 1922570489.
This appears to cause a crash in the following example
a, b, c;
l() {
int e = a, f = l, g, h, i, j;
float *d = c, *k = b;
for (;;)
for (; g < f; g++) {
k[h] = d[i];
k[h - 1] = d[j];
h += e << 1;
i += e;
}
}
clang -cc1 -triple i386-unknown-linux-gnu -emit-obj -target-cpu pentium-m -O1 -vectorize-loops -vectorize-slp reduced.c
llvm::Type *llvm::Type::getWithNewBitWidth(unsigned int) const: Assertion `isIntOrIntVectorTy() && "Original type expected to be a vector of integers or a scalar integer."' failed.
Some architectures do not have general vector select instructions (e.g.
AArch64). But some cmp/select patterns can be vectorized using other
instructions/intrinsics.
One example is using min/max instructions for certain patterns.
This patch updates the cost calculations for selects in the SLP
vectorizer to consider using min/max intrinsics.
This patch does not change SLP vectorizer's codegen itself to actually
generate those intrinsics, but relies on the backends to lower the
vector cmps & selects. This keeps things simple on the SLP side and
works well in practice for AArch64.
This exposes additional SLP vectorization opportunities in some
benchmarks on AArch64 (-O3 -flto).
Metric: SLP.NumVectorInstructions
Program base slp diff
test-suite...ications/JM/ldecod/ldecod.test 502.00 697.00 38.8%
test-suite...ications/JM/lencod/lencod.test 1023.00 1414.00 38.2%
test-suite...-typeset/consumer-typeset.test 56.00 65.00 16.1%
test-suite...6/464.h264ref/464.h264ref.test 804.00 822.00 2.2%
test-suite...006/453.povray/453.povray.test 3335.00 3357.00 0.7%
test-suite...CFP2000/177.mesa/177.mesa.test 2110.00 2121.00 0.5%
test-suite...:: External/Povray/povray.test 2378.00 2382.00 0.2%
Reviewed By: RKSimon, samparker
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89969
This patch is to add the support of the value tracking of the alignment assume bundle.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88669
As discussed in D89952,
instcombine can sometimes find a way to reduce similar patterns,
but it is incomplete.
InstSimplify uses the computeConstantRange() ValueTracking analysis
via simplifyICmpWithConstant(), so we just need to fill in the max
value of cttz to process any "icmp pred cttz(X), C" pattern (the
min value is initialized to zero automatically).
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/Z_SLWZ
Follow-up to D89976.
As discussed in D89952,
instcombine can sometimes find a way to reduce similar patterns,
but it is incomplete.
InstSimplify uses the computeConstantRange() ValueTracking analysis
via simplifyICmpWithConstant(), so we just need to fill in the max
value of ctlz to process any "icmp pred ctlz(X), C" pattern (the
min value is initialized to zero automatically).
Follow-up to D89976.
As discussed in D89952,
instcombine can sometimes find a way to reduce similar patterns,
but it is incomplete.
InstSimplify uses the computeConstantRange() ValueTracking analysis
via simplifyICmpWithConstant(), so we just need to fill in the max
value of ctpop to process any "icmp pred ctpop(X), C" pattern (the
min value is initialized to zero automatically).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89976
Prior to this patch, computeKnownBits would only try to deduce trailing zeros
bits for getelementptrs. This patch adds the logic to treat geps as a series
of add * scaling factor.
Thanks to this patch, using a gep or performing an address computation
directly "by hand" (ptrtoint followed by adds and mul followed by inttoptr)
offers the same computeKnownBits information.
Previously, the "by hand" approach would have given more information.
This is related to https://llvm.org/PR47241.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86364
This patch adds metadata !noundef and makes load instructions can optionally have it.
A load with !noundef always return a well-defined value (has no undef bit or isn't poison).
If the loaded value isn't well defined, the behavior is undefined.
This metadata can be used to encode the assumption from C/C++ that certain reads of variables should have well-defined values.
It is helpful for optimizing freeze instructions away, because freeze can be removed when its operand has well-defined value, and showing that a load from arbitrary location is well-defined is usually hard otherwise.
The same information can be encoded with llvm.assume with operand bundle; using metadata is chosen because I wasn't sure whether code motion can be freely done when llvm.assume is inserted from clang instead.
The existing codebase already is stripping unknown metadata when doing code motion, so using metadata is UB-safe as well.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89050
TypeSize comparisons using overloaded operators should be replaced by
the new isKnownXY comparators when the operands can be fixed-length or
scalable vectors.
In ValueTracking there are several uses of the overloaded operators in
`isKnownNonZero` and `ComputeMultiple`. In the former we already bail
out on scalable vectors since we currently have no way to represent
DemandedElts, and the latter is operating on scalar integers, so we can
assume fixed-size in both instances.
Reviewed By: david-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89387
This patch refactors the logic in ValueTracking.cpp so that
computeKnownBitsForMul now uses a helper function from KnownBits.
NFC
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88935
Handle the case when all inputs of phi are proven to be non zero.
Constants are checked in beginning of this method before check for depth of recursion,
so it is a partial case of non-constant phi.
Recursion depth is already handled by the function.
Reviewers: aqjune, nikic, efriedma
Reviewed By: nikic
Subscribers: dantrushin, hiraditya, jdoerfert, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88276
It was mentioned that D88276 that when a phi node is visited, terminators at their incoming edges should be used for CtxI.
This is a patch that makes two functions (ComputeNumSignBitsImpl, isGuaranteedNotToBeUndefOrPoison) to do so.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88360
As discussed in D87877, instcombine already has this fold,
but it was missing from the more general ValueTracking logic.
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/PumYZP
This is a patch that allows isGuaranteedNotToBeUndefOrPoison to return more precise result
when an argument is given, by looking through its uses at the entry block (and following blocks as well, if it is checking poison only).
This is useful when there is a function call with noundef arguments at the entry block.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88207
This implements support for isKnownNonZero, computeKnownBits when freeze is involved.
```
br (x != 0), BB1, BB2
BB1:
y = freeze x
```
In the above program, we can say that y is non-zero. The reason is as follows:
(1) If x was poison, `br (x != 0)` raised UB
(2) If x was fully undef, the branch again raised UB
(3) If x was non-zero partially undef, say `undef | 1`, `freeze x` will return a nondeterministic value which is also non-zero.
(4) If x was just a concrete value, it is trivial
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75808
This patch adds isGuaranteedNotToBePoison and programUndefinedIfUndefOrPoison.
isGuaranteedNotToBePoison will be used at D75808. The latter function is used at isGuaranteedNotToBePoison.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84242
This patch changes ElementCount so that the Min and Scalable
members are now private and can only be accessed via the get
functions getKnownMinValue() and isScalable(). In addition I've
added some other member functions for more commonly used operations.
Hopefully this makes the class more useful and will reduce the
need for calling getKnownMinValue().
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86065
For StackLifetime after finding alloca we need to check that
values ponting to the begining of alloca.
Reviewed By: eugenis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86692
This patch adds NoUndef to Intrinsics.td.
The attribute is attached to llvm.assume's operand, because llvm.assume(undef)
is UB.
It is attached to pointer operands of several memory accessing intrinsics
as well.
This change makes ValueTracking::getGuaranteedNonPoisonOps' intrinsic check
unnecessary, so it is removed.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86576
This patch helps getGuaranteedNonPoisonOp find multiple non-poison operands.
Instead of special-casing llvm.assume, I think it is also a viable option to
add noundef to Intrinsics.td. If it makes sense, I'll make a patch for that.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86477
There's a potential motivating case to increase this limit in PR47191:
http://bugs.llvm.org/PR47191
But first we should make it less hacky. The limit in InstCombine is directly tied
to this value because an increase there can cause asserts in the underlying value
tracking calls if not changed together. The usage in VectorUtils is independent,
but the comment suggests that we should use the same value unless there's a known
reason to diverge. There are similar limits in codegen analysis, but I think we
should leave those independent in case we intentionally want the optimization
power/cost to be different there.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86113
In GlobalISel, if you have a load into a small type with a range, you'll hit
an assert if you try to compute known bits on it starting at a larger type.
e.g.
```
%x:_(s8) = G_LOAD %whatever(p0) :: (load 1 ... !range !n)
...
%y:_(s32) = G_SOMETHING %x
```
When we walk through G_SOMETHING and hit the load, the width of our known bits
is 32. However, the width of the range is going to be 8. This will cause us
to hit an assert.
To fix this, make computeKnownBitsFromRangeMetadata zero extend or truncate
the range type to match the bitwidth of the known bits we're calculating.
Add a testcase in CodeGen/GlobalISel/KnownBitsTest.cpp to reflect that this
works now.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D85375
Add the optimizations we have in the SelectionDAG version.
Known non-negative copies all known bits. Any known one other than
the sign bit makes result non-negative.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85000
David Sherwood