This patch adds basic support for a DAG variant of the canCreateUndefOrPoison call and updates DAGCombiner::visitFREEZE to use it, further Opcodes (including target specific Opcodes) can be handled when we have test coverage.
So far, I've left visitFREEZE to just use this for unary nodes (which currently means the existing BITCAST/FREEZE cases) - later patches will add other unary opcodes (with test coverage) and we can also refactor visitFREEZE to support a general number of operands like we do in InstCombinerImpl::pushFreezeToPreventPoisonFromPropagating.
I'm not aware of any vector test freeze coverage so the DemandedElts (and the Depth) args are not being used yet - but they are in place. Similarly we will be able to handle poison generating SDNodeFlags as and when it becomes an issue.
Part of the work for D106675 / PR50468
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130646
FoldConstantArithmetic can fold constant vectors hidden behind bitcasts (e.g. vXi64 -> v2Xi32 on 32-bit platforms), but currently bails if either vector contains undef elements. These undefs can often occur due to SimplifyDemandedBits/VectorElts calls recognising that the upper bits are often unnecessary (e.g. funnel-shift/rotate implicit-modulo and AND masks).
This patch adds a basic 'FoldValueWithUndef' handler that will attempt to constant fold if one or both of the ops are undef - so far this just handles the AND and MUL cases where we always fold to zero.
The RISCV codegen increase is interesting - it looks like the BUILD_VECTOR lowering was loading a constant pool entry but now (with all elements defined constant) it can materialize the constant instead?
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130839
This patch ensures consistency in the construction of FP_ROUND nodes
such that they always use ISD::TargetConstant instead of ISD::Constant.
This additionally fixes a bug in the AArch64 SVE backend where patterns
were matching against TargetConstant nodes and sometimes failing when
passed a Constant node.
Reviewed By: paulwalker-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130370
Add a method for the various cases where we need to concatenate 2 KnownBits together (BUILD_PAIR and SHIFT_PARTS in particular) - uses the existing APInt::concat 'HiBits.concat(LoBits)' convention
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130557
GetDemandedBits is mainly a wrapper around SimplifyMultipleUseDemandedBits now, and is only used by DAGCombiner::visitSTORE so I've moved all remaining functionality there.
visitSTORE was making use of this to 'simplify' constants for a trunc-store. Just removing this code left to a mixture of regressions and gains - it came down to whether a target preferred a sign or zero extended constant for materialization/truncation. I've just moved the code over for now, but a next step would be to move this to targetShrinkDemandedConstant, but some targets that override the method expect a basic binop, and might react badly to a store node.....
I'm actually trying to get rid of GetDemandedBits - but while dismantling it I noticed that we were altering opaque constants. Fixing that causes a FP_TO_INT_SAT regression that should be addressed separately - I'll raise a bug.
This patch allows SimplifyDemandedBits to call SimplifyMultipleUseDemandedBits in cases where the ISD::SRL source operand has other uses, enabling us to peek through the shifted value if we don't demand all the bits/elts.
This is another step towards removing SelectionDAG::GetDemandedBits and just using TargetLowering::SimplifyMultipleUseDemandedBits.
There a few cases where we end up with extra register moves which I think we can accept in exchange for the increased ILP.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77804
This patch starts small, only detecting sequences of the form
<a, a+n, a+2n, a+3n, ...> where a and n are ConstantSDNodes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125194
We still haven't found a solution that correctly handles 'don't care' sub elements properly - given how close it is to the next release branch, I'm making this fail safe change and we can revisit this later if we can't find alternatives.
NOTE: This isn't a reversion of D128570 - it's the removal of undef handling across bitcasts entirely
Fixes#56520
Concat KnownBits from ISD::SHL_PARTS / ISD::SRA_PARTS / ISD::SRL_PARTS lo/hi operands and perform the KnownBits calculation by the shift amount on the extended type, before splitting the KnownBits based on the requested lo/hi result.
Vector fptosi_sat and fptoui_sat were being expanded by unrolling the
vector operation. This doesn't work for scalable vector, so this patch
adds a call to TLI.expandFP_TO_INT_SAT if the vector is scalable.
Scalable tests are added for AArch64 and RISCV. Some of the AArch64
fptoi_sat operations should be legal, but that will be handled in
another patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130028
Similar to what we already do in getNode for basic ADD/SUB nodes, return the X operand directly, but here we know that there will be no/zero overflow as well.
As noted on D127115 - this path is being exercised by llvm/test/CodeGen/ARM/dsp-mlal.ll, although I haven't been able to get any codegen without a topological worklist.
This was stored in LiveIntervals, but not actually used for anything
related to LiveIntervals. It was only used in one check for if a load
instruction is rematerializable. I also don't think this was entirely
correct, since it was implicitly assuming constant loads are also
dereferenceable.
Remove this and rely only on the invariant+dereferenceable flags in
the memory operand. Set the flag based on the AA query upfront. This
should have the same net benefit, but has the possible disadvantage of
making this AA query nonlazy.
Preserve the behavior of assuming pointsToConstantMemory implying
dereferenceable for now, but maybe this should be changed.
When doing scalable vectorization, the loop vectorizer uses a urem in the computation of the vector trip count. The RHS of that urem is a (possibly shifted) call to @llvm.vscale.
vscale is effectively the number of "blocks" in the vector register. (That is, types such as <vscale x 8 x i8> and <vscale x 1 x i8> both fill one 64 bit block, and vscale is essentially how many of those blocks there are in a single vector register at runtime.)
We know from the RISCV V extension specification that VLEN must be a power of two between ELEN and 2^16. Since our block size is 64 bits, the must be a power of two numbers of blocks. (For everything other than VLEN<=32, but that's already broken.)
It is worth noting that AArch64 SVE specification explicitly allows non-power-of-two sizes for the vector registers and thus can't claim that vscale is a power of two by this logic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129609
(Reapply after revert in e9ce1a5880 due to
Fuchsia test failures. Removed changes in lib/ExecutionEngine/ other
than error categories, to be checked in more detail and reapplied
separately.)
Bulk remove many of the more trivial uses of ManagedStatic in the llvm
directory, either by defining a new getter function or, in many cases,
moving the static variable directly into the only function that uses it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129120
Bulk remove many of the more trivial uses of ManagedStatic in the llvm
directory, either by defining a new getter function or, in many cases,
moving the static variable directly into the only function that uses it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129120
This patch adds the support for `fmax` and `fmin` operations in `atomicrmw`
instruction. For now (at least in this patch), the instruction will be expanded
to CAS loop. There are already a couple of targets supporting the feature. I'll
create another patch(es) to enable them accordingly.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127041
We're slowly removing SelectionDAG::GetDemandedBits and replacing it with SimplifyMultipleUseDemandedBits, we no longer have any uses for the vector demanded elt variant.
This helps handling a case where the BUILD_VECTOR has i16 element type
and i32 constant operands
t2: v8i16 = setcc t8, t17, setult:ch
t3: v8i16 = BUILD_VECTOR Constant:i32<1>, ...
t4: v8i16 = and t2, t3
t5: v8i16 = add t8, t4
This can be turned into t5: v8i16 = sub t8, t2, and allows us to remove
t3 and t4 from the DAG.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127354
In the same spirit as D73543 and in reply to https://reviews.llvm.org/D126768#3549920 this patch is adding support for `__builtin_memset_inline`.
The idea is to get support from the compiler to easily write efficient memory function implementations.
This patch could be split in two:
- one for the LLVM part adding the `llvm.memset.inline.*` intrinsics.
- and another one for the Clang part providing the instrinsic as a builtin.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126903
This matches what we do in IR. For the RISC-V test case, this allows
us to use -8 for the AND mask instead of materializing a constant in a register.
Reviewed By: spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127335
As noticed on D127115 - we were missing this fold, instead just having the shuffle(shuffle(x,undef,splatmask),undef) fold. We should be able to merge these into one using SelectionDAG::isSplatValue, but we'll need to match the shuffle's undef handling first.
This also exposed an issue in SelectionDAG::isSplatValue which was incorrectly propagating the undef mask across a bitcast (it was trying to just bail with a APInt::isSubsetOf if it found any undefs but that was actually the wrong way around so didn't fire for partial undef cases).
Move the code that was added for D126896 after the normal recursive calls
to computeKnownBits. This allows us to calculate trailing zeros.
Previously we would break out of the switch before the recursive calls.
If C is non-negative, the result of the smax must also be
non-negative, so all sign bits of the result are 0.
This allows DAGCombiner to remove a zext_inreg in the modified test.
This zext_inreg started as a sext that became zext before type
legalization then was promoted to a zext_inreg.
Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126896
abs should only produce a positive value or the signed minimum
value. This means we can't fold abs(undef) to undef as that would
allow more values. Fold to 0 instead to match InstSimplify.
Fixes test mentioned in comment on pr55271.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126174
Most clients only used these methods because they wanted to be able to
extend or truncate to the same bit width (which is a no-op). Now that
the standard zext, sext and trunc allow this, there is no reason to use
the OrSelf versions.
The OrSelf versions additionally have the strange behaviour of allowing
extending to a *smaller* width, or truncating to a *larger* width, which
are also treated as no-ops. A small amount of client code relied on this
(ConstantRange::castOp and MicrosoftCXXNameMangler::mangleNumber) and
needed rewriting.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125557
This patch uses VP_REDUCE_AND and VP_REDUCE_OR to replace VP_REDUCE_SMAX,VP_REDUCE_SMIN,VP_REDUCE_UMAX and VP_REDUCE_UMIN for mask vector type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125002
During early gather/scatter enablement two different approaches
were taken to represent scaled indices:
* A Scale operand whereby byte_offsets = Index * Scale
* An IndexType whereby byte_offsets = Index * sizeof(MemVT.ElementType)
Having multiple representations is bad as shown by this patch which
fixes instances where the two are out of sync. The dedicated scale
operand is more flexible and pervasive so this patch removes the
UNSCALED values from IndexType. This means all indices are scaled
but the scale can be one, hence unscaled. SDNodes now use the scale
operand to answer the "isScaledIndex" question.
I toyed with the idea of keeping the UNSCALED enums and helper
functions but because they will have no uses and force SDNodes to
validate the set of supported values I figured it's best to remove
them. We can re-add them if there's a real need. For similar
reasons I've kept the IndexType enum when a bool could be used as I
think being explicitly looks better.
Depends On D123347
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123381
The patch make users not need to know getNode with SDNodeFlags argument may not
pass its flags.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125659
The result of sign_extend_inreg needs to have as many sign bits
as requested by the VT argument. The easiest way to guarantee this
is to fold it to 0.
SystemZ test was modified to avoid using undef.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/55178
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124696
This extends the (X & ~Y) | Y to X | Y fold to also work if ~Y is
a truncated not (when taking into account the mask X). This is
done by exporting the infrastructure added in D124856 and reusing
it here.
I've retained the old value of AllowUndefs=false, though probably
this can be switched to true with extra test coverage.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124930
Demanded bits analysis may replace a full-width not with a
any_extend (not (truncate X)) pattern. This patch looks through
this kind of pattern in haveNoCommonBitsSet(). Of course, we can
only do this if we only need negated bits in the non-extended part,
as the other bits may now be arbitrary. For example, if we have
haveNoCommonBitsSet(~X & Y, X) then ~X only needs to actually
negate bits set in Y.
This is only a partial solution to the problem in that it allows
add -> or conversion, but the resulting or doesn't get folded yet.
(I guess that will involve exposing getBitwiseNotOperand() as a
more general helper and using that in the relevant transform.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124856
This is the DAG variant of D124763. The code already handles the
general pattern, but not this degenerate case.
This allows folding A + (B&~A) to A | (B&~A) which further holds
to A | B.
Handling on the SDAG level is needed because in the motivating
case the add is actually a getelementptr, which only gets converted
into an add on the SDAG level. However, this patch is not quite
sufficient to handle the getelementptr case yet, because of an
interfering demanded bits simplification.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124772
The description of SETCC says
/// SetCC operator - This evaluates to a true value iff the condition is
/// true. If the result value type is not i1 then the high bits conform
/// to getBooleanContents.
Without this patch, we sign extended the i1 to the used larger type
regardless of getBooleanContents. This resulted in miscompiles, as
shown in the attached testcase that ended up returning -1 instead of
1 when using -mattr=+v.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/55168
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124618
This patch adds the necessary infrastructure to lower vp.fcmp via
ISD::VP_SETCC to RVV instructions.
Most notably this patch adds cond-code legalization for VP_SETCC,
reusing the existing TargetLowering::LegalizeSetCCCondCode by passing in
additional SDValue parameters for the Mask and EVL. This method then
uses VP operations to legalize the condcode.
There is still a general lack of canonicalization on VP_SETCC as opposed
to SETCC which results in worse code than is theoretically possible.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123051
Place PersistentId declaration under #if LLVM_ENABLE_ABI_BREAKING_CHECKS to
reduce memory usage when it is not needed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120714
As raised on PR52267, XOR(X,MIN_SIGNED_VALUE) can be treated as ADD(X,MIN_SIGNED_VALUE), so let these cases use the 'AddLike' folds, similar to how we perform no-common-bits OR(X,Y) cases.
define i8 @src(i8 %x) {
%r = xor i8 %x, 128
ret i8 %r
}
=>
define i8 @tgt(i8 %x) {
%r = add i8 %x, 128
ret i8 %r
}
Transformation seems to be correct!
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/qV46E2
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122754
This patch fixes a (seemingly very rare) crash during vector constant
folding introduced in D113300.
Normally, during legalization, if we create an illegally-typed node during
a failed attempt at constant folding it's cleaned up before being
visited, due to it having no uses.
If, however, an illegally-typed node is created during one round of
legalization and isn't cleaned up, it's possible for a second round of
legalization to create new illegally-typed nodes which add extra uses to
the old illegal nodes. This means that we can end up visiting the old
nodes before they're known to be dead, at which point we crash.
I'm not happy about this fix. Creating illegal types at all seems like a
bad idea, but we all-too-often rely on illegal constants being
successfully folded and being fixed up afterwards. However, we can't
rely on constant folding actually happening, and we don't have a
foolproof way of peering into the future.
Perhaps the correct fix is to revisit the node-iteration order during
legalization, ensuring we visit all uses of nodes before the nodes
themselves. Or alternatively we could try and clean up dead nodes
immediately after failing constant folding.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122382
The alignment needs to be part of the folding set hash. This is
handled by getAssertAlign when nodes are created, but needs to repeated here.
No test case as I found it as part of a very early experimental patch.
Reviewed By: spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122279
This patch introduces two new experimental IR intrinsics and SDAG nodes
to represent vector strided loads and stores.
Reviewed By: simoll
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114884
SDNodes with different target flags may now be folded together
rightfully resulting in the assertion in the refineAlignment.
Folding nodes with different target flags may result in the
wrong load instructions produced at least on the AMDGPU.
Fixes: SWDEV-326805
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121335
Currently we only check for splat shuffles, this extends it to see if the source operand is a splat across the demanded elts based upon the shuffle mask
This patch adds support for recognising vector splats by peeking through bitcasts to vectors with smaller element types - if all the offset subelements are splats then the bitcasted vector is a splat as well.
We don't have great coverage for isSplatValue so I've made this pretty specific to the use case I'm trying to fix - regressions in some vXi64 vector shift by splat cases that 32-bit x86 doesn't recognise because the shift amount buildvector has been type legalised to v2Xi32.
We can add further support (floats, bitcast from larger element types, undef elements) when we have actual test coverage.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120553
When doing SelectionDAG::ReplaceAllUsesOfValuesWith a worklist is
prepared containing all users that should be updated. Then we use
the RemoveNodeFromCSEMaps/AddModifiedNodeToCSEMaps helpers to handle
recursive CSE updates while doing the replacements.
This patch aims at solving a problem that could arise if the recursive
CSE updates would result in an SDNode present in the worklist is being
removed as a side-effect of morphing a prio user in the worklist.
To examplify such a scenario, imagine that we have these nodes in
the DAG
t12: i64 = add t8, t11
t13: i64 = add t12, t8
t14: i64 = add t11, t11
t15: i64 = add t14, t8
t16: i64 = sub t13, t15
and that the t8 uses should be replaced by t11. An initial worklist
(listing the users that should be morphed) could be [t12, t13, t15].
When updating t12 we get
t12: i64 = add t11, t11
which results in a CSE update that replaces t14 by t12, so we get
t15: i64 = add t12, t8
which results in a CSE update that replaces t13 by t12, so we get
t16: i64 = sub t12, t15
and then t13 is removed given that it was the last use of t13.
So when being done with the updates triggered by rewriting the use
of t8 in t12 the t13 node no longer exist. And we used to end up
hitting an assertion when continuing with the worklist aiming at
replacing the t8 uses in t13.
The solution is based on using a DAGUpdateListener, making sure that
we prune a user from the worklist if it is removed during the
recursive CSE updates.
The bug was found using an OOT target. I think the problem is quite
old, even if the particular intree target reproducer added in this
patch seem to pass when using LLVM 13.0.0.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119088
This adds very basic combines for AVG nodes, mostly for constant folding
and handling degenerate (zero) cases. The code performs mostly the same
transforms as visitMULHS, adjusted for AVG nodes.
Constant folding extends to a higher bitwidth and drops the lowest bit.
For undef nodes, `avg undef, x` is transformed to x. There is also a
transform for `avgfloor x, 0` transforming to `shr x, 1`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119559
This helps recognise patterns where we're trying to match STEP_VECTOR
patterns to INDEX instructions that take a GPR for the Start/Step.
The reason for canonicalising this operation to the LHS is
because it will already be canonicalised to the LHS if the RHS
is a constant splat vector.
Reviewed By: paulwalker-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118459
Do "simplifyShift" and "FoldConstantArithmetic" folds for the SSHLSAT
and USHLSAT DAG nodes.
This includes folds such as:
(shlsat undef/poison, x) -> 0
(shlsat x, undef/poison) -> undef
(shlsat x, too_large_shamt) -> undef
(shlsat 0, x) -> 0
(shlsat x, 0) -> x
(shlsat c1, c2) -> c3
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118603
We already perform some basic folds (add/sub with zero etc.) on scalar types, this patch adds some basic support for constant splats as well in a few cases (we can add more with future test coverage).
In the cases I've enabled, we can handle buildvector implicit truncation as we're not creating new constant nodes from the vector types - we're just returning existing nodes. This allows us to get a number of extra cases in the aarch64 tests.
I haven't enabled support for undefs in buildvector splats, as we're often checking for zero/allones patterns that return the original constant and we shouldn't be returning undef elements in some of these cases - we can enable this later if we're OK with creating new constants.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118264
The loop below the changed line assumes that the element
width of the target constant is the same as the element
width of the loaded value, but that is not always true.
We could try harder to do some kind of min/max calc even
if the sizes don't match, but that can be another patch
if needed. This fixes#53401 (miscompile) and does not
change the motivating cases added when this analysis
was introduced:
ad298f86b7
Given that step_vector is practically a constant, doing this early
helps with DAGCombine folds that happen before type legalization.
There is currently no way to test this happens earlier, although existing
tests for step_vector folds continue protect the folds happening at all.
Reviewed By: david-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117863
This can show up during when bitreverse is expanded to bswap and
swap of bits within a byte. If the input is already a bswap, we
should cancel them out before we further transform them in a way
that makes it harder to see the redundancy.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118007
SelectionDAG::getNode() canonicalises constants to the RHS if the
operation is commutative, but it doesn't do so for constant splat
vectors. Doing this early helps making certain folds on vector types,
simplifying the code required for target DAGCombines that are enabled
before Type legalization.
Somewhat to my surprise, DAGCombine doesn't seem to traverse the
DAG in a post-order DFS, so at the time of doing some custom fold where
the input is a MUL, DAGCombiner::visitMUL hasn't yet reordered the
constant splat to the RHS.
This patch leads to a few improvements, but also a few minor regressions,
which I traced down to D46492. When I tried reverting this change to see
if the changes were still necessary, I ran into some segfaults. Not sure
if there is some latent bug there.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117794
Split vp.reduction.* intrinsics by splitting the vector to reduce in
two halves, perform the reduction operation in each one of them and
accumulate the results of both operations.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117469
When we know the value we're extending is a negative constant then it
makes sense to use SIGN_EXTEND because this may improve code quality in
some cases, particularly when doing a constant splat of an unpacked vector
type. For example, for SVE when splatting the value -1 into all elements
of a vector of type <vscale x 2 x i32> the element type will get promoted
from i32 -> i64. In this case we want the splat value to sign-extend from
(i32 -1) -> (i64 -1), whereas currently it zero-extends from
(i32 -1) -> (i64 0xFFFFFFFF). Sign-extending the constant means we can use
a single mov immediate instruction.
New tests added here:
CodeGen/AArch64/sve-vector-splat.ll
I believe we see some code quality improvements in these existing
tests too:
CodeGen/AArch64/reduce-and.ll
CodeGen/AArch64/unfold-masked-merge-vector-variablemask.ll
The apparent regressions in CodeGen/AArch64/fast-isel-cmp-vec.ll only
occur because the test disables codegen prepare and branch folding.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114357
Original patch by @hussainjk.
This patch was split off from D109377 to keep vector legalization
(widening/splitting) separate from vector element legalization
(promoting).
While the original patch added a third overload of
SelectionDAG::getVPStore, this patch takes the liberty of collapsing
those all down to 1, as three overloads seems excessive for a
little-used node.
The original patch also used ModifyToType in places, but that method
still crashes on scalable vector types. Seeing as the other VP
legalization methods only work when all operands need identical
widening, this patch follows in that vein.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117235
This commit sometimes causes a crash when compiling a vtable thunk. E.g.:
clang '--target=aarch64-grtev4-linux-gnu' -xc++ - -c -o /dev/null <<EOF
struct a {
virtual int f();
};
struct c {
virtual int &g() const;
};
struct d : a, c {
int &g() const;
};
int &d::g() const {}
EOF
Some follow-up commits have been reverted as well:
Revert "IR: Make getRetAlign check callee function attributes"
Revert "Fix MSVC "32-bit shift implicitly converted to 64 bits" warning. NFC."
Revert "Fix MSVC "32-bit shift implicitly converted to 64 bits" warning. NFC."
This reverts commit 4f414af6a7.
This reverts commit a5507d2e25.
This reverts commit 3d2d208f6a.
This reverts commit 07ddfa95e3.
When we know the value we're extending is a negative constant then it
makes sense to use SIGN_EXTEND because this may improve code quality in
some cases, particularly when doing a constant splat of an unpacked vector
type. For example, for SVE when splatting the value -1 into all elements
of a vector of type <vscale x 2 x i32> the element type will get promoted
from i32 -> i64. In this case we want the splat value to sign-extend from
(i32 -1) -> (i64 -1), whereas currently it zero-extends from
(i32 -1) -> (i64 0xFFFFFFFF). Sign-extending the constant means we can use
a single mov immediate instruction.
New tests added here:
CodeGen/AArch64/sve-vector-splat.ll
I believe we see some code quality improvements in these existing
tests too:
CodeGen/AArch64/dag-numsignbits.ll
CodeGen/AArch64/reduce-and.ll
CodeGen/AArch64/unfold-masked-merge-vector-variablemask.ll
The apparent regressions in CodeGen/AArch64/fast-isel-cmp-vec.ll only
occur because the test disables codegen prepare and branch folding.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114357
Simon Pilgrim