This patch mechanically replaces None with std::nullopt where the
compiler would warn if None were deprecated. The intent is to reduce
the amount of manual work required in migrating from Optional to
std::optional.
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
This class is solely used as a lightweight and clean way to build a set of
attributes to be removed from an AttrBuilder. Previously AttrBuilder was used
both for building and removing, which introduced odd situation like creation of
Attribute with dummy value because the only relevant part was the attribute
kind.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116110
AttributeList::hasAttribute() is confusing, use clearer methods like
hasParamAttr()/hasRetAttr().
Add hasRetAttr() since it was missing from AttributeList.
These currently always require a type parameter. The bitcode reader
already upgrades old bitcode without the type parameter to use the
pointee type.
In cases where the caller does not have byval but the callee does, we
need to follow CallBase::paramHasAttr() and also look at the callee for
the byval type so that CallBase::isByValArgument() and
CallBase::getParamByValType() are in sync. Do the same for preallocated.
While we're here add a corresponding version for inalloca since we'll
need it soon.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104663
verifyFunctionAttrs has a comment that the value V is printed in error messages. The recently added errors for attributes didn't print V. Make them print V.
Change the stringification of AttributeList. Firstly they started with 'PAL[' which stood for ParamAttrsList. Change that to 'AttributeList[' matching its current name AttributeList. Print out semantic meaning of the index instead of the raw index value (i.e. 'return', 'function' or 'arg(n)').
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101484
Attributes don't know their parent Context, adding this would make Attribute larger. Instead, we add hasParentContext that answers whether this Attribute belongs to a particular LLVMContext by checking for itself inside the context's FoldingSet. Same with AttributeSet and AttributeList. The Verifier checks them with the Module context.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99362
I think byval/sret and the others are close to being able to rip out
the code to support the missing type case. A lot of this code is
shared with inalloca, so catch this up to the others so that can
happen.
When we switch to opaque pointer types we will need some way to describe
how many bytes a 'byval' parameter should occupy on the stack. This adds
a (for now) optional extra type parameter.
If present, the type must match the pointee type of the argument.
The original commit did not remap byval types when linking modules, which broke
LTO. This version fixes that.
Note to front-end maintainers: if this causes test failures, it's probably
because the "byval" attribute is printed after attributes without any parameter
after this change.
llvm-svn: 362128
When we switch to opaque pointer types we will need some way to describe
how many bytes a 'byval' parameter should occupy on the stack. This adds
a (for now) optional extra type parameter.
If present, the type must match the pointee type of the argument.
Note to front-end maintainers: if this causes test failures, it's probably
because the "byval" attribute is printed after attributes without any parameter
after this change.
llvm-svn: 362012
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
The code uses the index of the last element in the sorted array to determine the maximum size needed for the vector. But if the last index is a FunctionIndex(~0), attrIdxToArrayIdx will return 0 and the vector will have size 1. If there are any indices before FunctionIndex, those values would return a value larger than 0 from attrIdxToArrayIdx. So in this case we need to look in front of the FunctionIndex to get the true size needed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45632
llvm-svn: 330136
Summary:
Discovered while working on a patch to move alignment in
@llvm.memcpy/move/set from an arg into parameter attributes.
The current implementations of AttributeSet::removeAttribute() and
AttributeList::removeAttribute crash when attempting to remove the
alignment attribute. Currently, these implementations add the
to-be-removed attributes to an AttrBuilder and then remove
the builder from the list/set. Alignment is special in that it
must be added to a builder with an integer value for the alignment;
attempts to add alignment to a builder without a value is an error.
This change fixes the removeAttribute implementations for AttributeSet and
AttributeList to make them able to remove the alignment, and other similar,
attributes.
Reviewers: rnk, chandlerc, pete, javed.absar, reames
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41951
llvm-svn: 322735
getParamAlignment expects an argument number, not an AttributeList
index.
Johan Englan, who works on LDC, found this bug and told me about it off
list.
llvm-svn: 303458
This broke the Clang build. (Clang-side patch missing?)
Original commit message:
> [IR] Make add/remove Attributes use AttrBuilder instead of
> AttributeList
>
> This change cleans up call sites and avoids creating temporary
> AttributeList objects.
>
> NFC
llvm-svn: 301712
The 'addAttributes(unsigned, AttrBuilder)' overload delegated to 'get'
instead of 'addAttributes'.
Since we can implicitly construct an AttrBuilder from an AttributeSet,
just standardize on AttrBuilder.
llvm-svn: 300651
Summary:
This class is a list of AttributeSetNodes corresponding the function
prototype of a call or function declaration. This class used to be
called ParamAttrListPtr, then AttrListPtr, then AttributeSet. It is
typically accessed by parameter and return value index, so
"AttributeList" seems like a more intuitive name.
Rename AttributeSetImpl to AttributeListImpl to follow suit.
It's useful to rename this class so that we can rename AttributeSetNode
to AttributeSet later. AttributeSet is the set of attributes that apply
to a single function, argument, or return value.
Reviewers: sanjoy, javed.absar, chandlerc, pete
Reviewed By: pete
Subscribers: pete, jholewinski, arsenm, dschuff, mehdi_amini, jfb, nhaehnle, sbc100, void, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31102
llvm-svn: 298393
We were using array_pod_sort on an array of type 'Attribute', which
wraps a pointer to AttributeImpl. For the most part this didn't matter
because the printing code prints enum attributes in a defined order, but
integer attributes such as 'align' and 'dereferenceable' were not
ordered.
Furthermore, AttributeImpl::operator< was broken for integer attributes.
An integer attribute is a kind and an integer value, and both pieces
need to be compared.
By fixing the comparison operator, we can go back to std::sort, and
things look good now. This should fix clang arm-swiftcall.c test
failures on Windows.
llvm-svn: 265361
Kazu Hirata