This patch mechanically replaces None with std::nullopt where the
compiler would warn if None were deprecated. The intent is to reduce
the amount of manual work required in migrating from Optional to
std::optional.
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
Currently the only way to do this is to work with the instruction list directly.
This is part of a series of cleanup patches towards making BasicBlock::getInstList() private.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138875
This switches everything to use the memory attribute proposed in
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-unify-memory-effect-attributes/65579.
The old argmemonly, inaccessiblememonly and inaccessiblemem_or_argmemonly
attributes are dropped. The readnone, readonly and writeonly attributes
are restricted to parameters only.
The old attributes are auto-upgraded both in bitcode and IR.
The bitcode upgrade is a policy requirement that has to be retained
indefinitely. The IR upgrade is mainly there so it's not necessary
to update all tests using memory attributes in this patch, which
is already large enough. We could drop that part after migrating
tests, or retain it longer term, to make it easier to import IR
from older LLVM versions.
High-level Function/CallBase APIs like doesNotAccessMemory() or
setDoesNotAccessMemory() are mapped transparently to the memory
attribute. Code that directly manipulates attributes (e.g. via
AttributeList) on the other hand needs to switch to working with
the memory attribute instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135780
To solve the readnone problems in coroutines. See
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/address-thread-identification-problems-with-coroutine/62015
for details.
According to the discussion, we decide to fix the problem by inserting
isPresplitCoroutine() checks in different passes instead of
wrapping/unwrapping readnone attributes in CoroEarly/CoroCleanup passes.
In this direction, we might not be able to cover every case at first.
Let's take a "find and fix" strategy.
Reviewed By: nikic, nhaehnle, jyknight
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127383
Following some recent discussions, this changes the representation
of callbrs in IR. The current blockaddress arguments are replaced
with `!` label constraints that refer directly to callbr indirect
destinations:
; Before:
%res = callbr i8* asm "", "=r,r,i"(i8* %x, i8* blockaddress(@test8, %foo))
to label %asm.fallthrough [label %foo]
; After:
%res = callbr i8* asm "", "=r,r,!i"(i8* %x)
to label %asm.fallthrough [label %foo]
The benefit of this is that we can easily update the successors of
a callbr, without having to worry about also updating blockaddress
references. This should allow us to remove some limitations:
* Allow unrolling/peeling/rotation of callbr, or any other
clone-based optimizations
(https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/41834)
* Allow duplicate successors
(https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/45248)
This is just the IR representation change though, I will follow up
with patches to remove limtations in various transformation passes
that are no longer needed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129288
A new function 'getConstrainedIntrinsic' is added, which for any gived
instruction returns id of the corresponding constrained intrinsic. If
there is no constrained counterpart for the instruction or the instruction
is already a constrained intrinsic, the function returns zero.
This is recommit of 115b3ace36, reverted in
8160dd582b.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69562
This reverts commit 115b3ace36.
Starting from this commit the buildbot sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan
starts failing (build 10071). Reverted for investigation.
A new function 'getConstrainedIntrinsic' is added, which for any gived
instruction returns id of the corresponding constrained intrinsic. If
there is no constrained counterpart for the instruction or the instruction
is already a constrained intrinsic, the function returns zero.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69562
Fix a dangling else that gcc-11 warned about. The EXPECT_EQ macro
expands to an if-else, so the whole construction contains a hidden
dangling else.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113346
When we have an actual shuffle, we can impose the additional restriction
that the mask replicates the elements of the first operand, so we know
the replication factor as a ratio of output and op0 vector sizes.
These tests have pretty high O() complexity due to their nature,
which leads to potentially-long runtimes.
While in release build for me they took ~1 and ~2 sec,
as noted in https://reviews.llvm.org/D113214#inline-1080479
they take minutes in debug build.
Fine-tune the amount of permutations they deal with,
without affecting the test coverage. After this,
they take <~10ms each for me (in release build),
hopefully that is good-enough for debug build too.
Avid readers of this saga may recall from previous installments,
that replication mask replicates (lol) each of the `VF` elements
in a vector `ReplicationFactor` times. For example, the mask for
`ReplicationFactor=3` and `VF=4` is: `<0,0,0,1,1,1,2,2,2,3,3,3>`.
More importantly, replication mask is used by LoopVectorizer
when using masked interleaved memory operations.
As discussed in previous installments, while it is used by LV,
and we **seem** to support masked interleaved memory operations on X86,
it's support in cost model leaves a lot to be desired:
until basically yesterday even for AVX512 we had no cost model for it.
As it has been witnessed in the recent
AVX2 `X86TTIImpl::getInterleavedMemoryOpCost()`
costmodel patches, while it is hard-enough to query the cost
of a particular assembly sequence [from llvm-mca],
afterwards the check lines LV costmodel tests must be updated manually.
This is, at the very least, boring.
Okay, now we have decent costmodel coverage for interleaving shuffles,
but now basically the same mind-killing sequence has to be performed
for replication mask. I think we can improve at least the second half
of the problem, by teaching
the `TargetTransformInfoImplCRTPBase::getUserCost()` to recognize
`Instruction::ShuffleVector` that are repetition masks,
adding exhaustive test coverage
using `-cost-model -analyze` + `utils/update_analyze_test_checks.py`
This way we can have good exhaustive coverage for cost model,
and only basic coverage for the LV costmodel.
This patch adds precise undef-aware `isReplicationMask()`,
with exhaustive test coverage.
* `InstructionsTest.ShuffleMaskIsReplicationMask` shows that
it correctly detects all the known masks.
* `InstructionsTest.ShuffleMaskIsReplicationMask_undef`
shows that replacing some mask elements in a known replication mask
still allows us to recognize it as a replication mask.
Note, with enough undef elts, we may detect a different tuple.
* `InstructionsTest.ShuffleMaskIsReplicationMask_Exhaustive_Correctness`
shows that if we detected the replication mask with given params,
then if we actually generate a true replication mask with said params,
it matches element-wise ignoring undef mask elements.
Reviewed By: spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113214
This makes it slightly easier to deal with custom attributes and
CallBase already provides hasFnAttr versions that support both AttrKind
and StringRef arguments in a similar fashion.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92567
It was removed back in 2013 (f63dfbb) by Matt Arsenault but then
reverted since DragonEgg used it, but that project is no longer
maintained.
Reviewed By: ldionne, dexonsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92571
Shuffle mask for concat can't be expressed for scalable vectors, so we
should bail out. A test has been added that previously crashed, also
tested isIdentityWithPadding and isIdentityWithExtract where we already
bail out.
Reviewed By: sdesmalen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92475
Since the length of the llvm::SmallVector shufflemask is related to the
minimum number of elements in a scalable vector, it is fine to just get
the Min field of the ElementCount. This is already done for the similar
function changesLength, tests have been added for both.
Reviewed By: sdesmalen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92472
It's not possible to express an extract subvector shuffle mask for
a scalable vector.
Reviewed By: david-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92312
Typically branch_weights are i32, not i64.
This fixes entry_counts_cold.ll under NPM.
Reviewed By: asbirlea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90539
Introduce a helper which can be used to update the debug location of an
Instruction after the instruction is hoisted. This can be used to safely
drop a source location as recommended by the docs.
For more context, see the discussion in https://reviews.llvm.org/D60913.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85670
Introduce a helper on Instruction which can be used to update the debug
location after hoisting.
Use this in GVN and LICM, where we were mistakenly introducing new line
0 locations after hoisting (the docs recommend dropping the location in
this case).
For more context, see the discussion in https://reviews.llvm.org/D60913.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85670
Summary:
This extends the rules for when a call instruction is deemed to be an
FPMathOperator, which is based on the type of the call (i.e. the return
type of the function being called). Previously we only allowed
floating-point and vector-of-floating-point types. Now we also allow
arrays (nested to any depth) of floating-point and
vector-of-floating-point types.
This was motivated by llpc, the pipeline compiler for AMD GPUs
(https://github.com/GPUOpen-Drivers/llpc). llpc has many math library
functions that operate on vectors, typically represented as <4 x float>,
and some that operate on matrices, typically represented as
[4 x <4 x float>], and it's useful to be able to decorate calls to all
of them with fast math flags.
Reviewers: spatel, wristow, arsenm, hfinkel, aemerson, efriedma, cameron.mcinally, mcberg2017, jmolloy
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69161
The changes here are based on the corresponding diffs for allowing FMF on 'select':
D61917 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D61917>
As discussed there, we want to have fast-math-flags be a property of an FP value
because the alternative (having them on things like fcmp) leads to logical
inconsistency such as:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38086
The earlier patch for select made almost no practical difference because most
unoptimized conditional code begins life as a phi (based on what I see in clang).
Similarly, I don't expect this patch to do much on its own either because
SimplifyCFG promptly drops the flags when converting to select on a minimal
example like:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39535
But once we have this plumbing in place, we should be able to wire up the FMF
propagation and start solving cases like that.
The change to RecurrenceDescriptor::AddReductionVar() is required to prevent a
regression in a LoopVectorize test. We are intersecting the FMF of any
FPMathOperator there, so if a phi is not properly annotated, new math
instructions may not be either. Once we fix the propagation in SimplifyCFG, it
may be safe to remove that hack.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67564
llvm-svn: 372878
The changes here are based on the corresponding diffs for allowing FMF on 'select':
D61917
As discussed there, we want to have fast-math-flags be a property of an FP value
because the alternative (having them on things like fcmp) leads to logical
inconsistency such as:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38086
The earlier patch for select made almost no practical difference because most
unoptimized conditional code begins life as a phi (based on what I see in clang).
Similarly, I don't expect this patch to do much on its own either because
SimplifyCFG promptly drops the flags when converting to select on a minimal
example like:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39535
But once we have this plumbing in place, we should be able to wire up the FMF
propagation and start solving cases like that.
The change to RecurrenceDescriptor::AddReductionVar() is required to prevent a
regression in a LoopVectorize test. We are intersecting the FMF of any
FPMathOperator there, so if a phi is not properly annotated, new math
instructions may not be either. Once we fix the propagation in SimplifyCFG, it
may be safe to remove that hack.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67564
llvm-svn: 372866
Summary:
There's an unspoken invariant of callbr that the list of BlockAddress
Constants in the "function args" list match the BasicBlocks in the
"other labels" list. (This invariant is being added to the LangRef in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D67196).
When modifying the any of the indirect destinations of a callbr
instruction (possible jump targets), we need to update the function
arguments if the argument is a BlockAddress whose BasicBlock refers to
the indirect destination BasicBlock being replaced. Otherwise, many
transforms that modify successors will end up violating that invariant.
A recent change to the arm64 Linux kernel exposed this bug, which
prevents the kernel from booting.
I considered maintaining a mapping from indirect destination BasicBlock
to argument operand BlockAddress, but this ends up being a one to
potentially many (though usually one) mapping. Also, the list of
arguments to a function (or more typically inline assembly) ends up
being less than 10. The implementation is significantly simpler to just
rescan the full list of arguments. Because of the one to potentially
many relationship, the full arg list must be scanned (we can't stop at
the first instance).
Thanks to the following folks that reported the issue and helped debug
it:
* Nathan Chancellor
* Will Deacon
* Andrew Murray
* Craig Topper
Link: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43222
Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/649
Link: https://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2019-September/678330.html
Reviewers: craig.topper, chandlerc
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Subscribers: void, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits, nathanchance, srhines
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67252
llvm-svn: 371262
This patch removes the test part that relates to the non-strict
behavior of SwitchInstProfUpdateWrapper and changes
the assertion to llvm_unreachable() to allow the check in
release builds.
This patch prepares SwitchInstProfUpdateWrapper to become
strict with one line change. That is need to revert it easily
if any failure will arise.
llvm-svn: 365439
While prof branch_weights inconsistencies are being fixed patch
by patch (pass by pass) we need SwitchInstProfUpdateWrapper to
be safe with respect to inconsistent metadata that can come from
passes that have not been fixed yet. See the bug found by @nikic
in https://reviews.llvm.org/D62126.
This patch introduces one more state (called Invalid) to the
wrapper class that allows users to work with the underlying
SwitchInst ignoring the prof metadata changes.
Created a unit test for the SwitchInstProfUpdateWrapper class.
Reviewers: davidx, nikic, eraman, reames, chandlerc
Reviewed By: davidx
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62656
llvm-svn: 362473
This cleans up all GetElementPtr creation in LLVM to explicitly pass a
value type rather than deriving it from the pointer's element-type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57173
llvm-svn: 352913
This cleans up all InvokeInst creation in LLVM to explicitly pass a
function type rather than deriving it from the pointer's element-type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57171
llvm-svn: 352910
This cleans up all CallInst creation in LLVM to explicitly pass a
function type rather than deriving it from the pointer's element-type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57170
llvm-svn: 352909
Kazu Hirata