Nigel
/
llvm-project
forked from OSchip/llvm-project
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
313,463 Commits 29 Branches 0 Tags 2.2 GiB
Commit Graph

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Jonas Devlieghere 306809f292 [Reproducers] Capture return values of functions returning by ptr/ref 
For some reason I had convinced myself that functions returning by
pointer or reference do not require recording their result. However,
after further considering I don't see how that could work, at least not
with the current implementation. Interestingly enough, the reproducer
instrumentation already (mostly) accounts for this, though the
lldb-instr tool did not.

This patch adds the missing macros and updates the lldb-instr tool.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60178

llvm-svn: 357639
 2019-04-03 21:31:22 +00:00
Jonas Devlieghere 3b0a54e138 [lldb-instr] Support LLDB_RECORD_DUMMY 
Extend lldb-instr to insert LLDB_RECORD_DUMMY macros for currently
unsupported signatures (void and function pointers).

llvm-svn: 355710
 2019-03-08 18:33:40 +00:00
Jonas Devlieghere cd2e6c75f6 [lldb-instr] Test that we ignore existing macros. 
Although the functionality was already present, it wasn't tested.

llvm-svn: 354303
 2019-02-19 01:20:49 +00:00
Jonas Devlieghere 091b925284 [lldb-instr] Wrap returns of struct/classes in LLDB_RECORD_RESULT 
The instrumentation framework requires return values of custom classes
and structs to be wrapped in the LLDB_RECORD_RESULT macro.

llvm-svn: 354301
 2019-02-19 01:04:31 +00:00
Jonas Devlieghere d1511a4bc7 [lldb-instr] Add constructor and move test into lit/tools 
The test had an implicit constructor for the Foo struct. Also, as the
instrumentation doesn't have to be reproducer specific, I moved the
tests into the lit/tools directory.

llvm-svn: 354294
 2019-02-18 22:59:52 +00:00