to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
The new guideline is to qualify with 'llvm::' explicitly both in
'.h' and '.cpp' files. This simplifies moving the code between
header and source files and is easier to keep consistent.
llvm-svn: 350531
Standardize on the most common namespace setup in our *.cpp files:
using namespace llvm;
namespace clang {
namespace clangd {
void foo(StringRef) { ... }
And remove redundant llvm:: qualifiers. (Except for cases like
make_unique where this causes problems with std:: and ADL).
This choice is pretty arbitrary, but some broad consistency is nice.
This is going to conflict with everything. Sorry :-/
Squash the other configurations:
A)
using namespace llvm;
using namespace clang;
using namespace clangd;
void clangd::foo(StringRef);
This is in some of the older files. (It prevents accidentally defining a
new function instead of one in the header file, for what that's worth).
B)
namespace clang {
namespace clangd {
void foo(llvm::StringRef) { ... }
This is fine, but in practice the using directive often gets added over time.
C)
namespace clang {
namespace clangd {
using namespace llvm; // inside the namespace
This was pretty common, but is a bit misleading: name lookup preferrs
clang::clangd::foo > clang::foo > llvm:: foo (no matter where the using
directive is).
llvm-svn: 344850
Summary:
This paves the way for alternative transports (mac XPC, maybe messagepack?),
and also generally improves layering: testing ClangdLSPServer becomes less of
a pipe dream, we split up the JSONOutput monolith, etc.
This isn't a final state, much of what remains in JSONRPCDispatcher can go away,
handlers can call reply() on the transport directly, JSONOutput can be renamed
to StreamLogger and removed, etc. But this patch is sprawling already.
The main observable change (see tests) is that hitting EOF on input is now an
error: the client should send the 'exit' notification.
This is defensible: the protocol doesn't spell this case out. Reproducing the
current behavior for all combinations of shutdown/exit/EOF clutters interfaces.
We can iterate on this if desired.
Reviewers: jkorous, ioeric, hokein
Subscribers: mgorny, ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53286
llvm-svn: 344672
Summary:
This paves the way for alternative transports (mac XPC, maybe messagepack?),
and also generally improves layering: testing ClangdLSPServer becomes less of
a pipe dream, we split up the JSONOutput monolith, etc.
This isn't a final state, much of what remains in JSONRPCDispatcher can go away,
handlers can call reply() on the transport directly, JSONOutput can be renamed
to StreamLogger and removed, etc. But this patch is sprawling already.
The main observable change (see tests) is that hitting EOF on input is now an
error: the client should send the 'exit' notification.
This is defensible: the protocol doesn't spell this case out. Reproducing the
current behavior for all combinations of shutdown/exit/EOF clutters interfaces.
We can iterate on this if desired.
Reviewers: jkorous, ioeric, hokein
Subscribers: mgorny, ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53286
llvm-svn: 344620
Chandler Carruth