This patch adds the file provider which is responsible for capturing
files used by LLDB.
When capturing a reproducer, we use a file collector that is very
similar to the one used in clang. For every file that we touch, we add
an entry with a mapping from its virtual to its real path. When we
decide to generate a reproducer we copy over the files and their
permission into to reproducer folder.
When replaying a reproducer, we load the VFS mapping and instantiate a
RedirectingFileSystem. The latter will transparently use the files
available in the reproducer.
I've tested this on two macOS machines with an artificial example.
Still, it is very likely that I missed some places where we (still) use
native file system calls. I'm hoping to flesh those out while testing
with more advanced examples. However, I will fix those things in
separate patches.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54617
llvm-svn: 352538
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
In the original reproducer design, I expected providers to be more
dynamic than they turned out. For example, we don't have any instances
where one provider has multiple files. Additionally, I expected there to
be less locality between capture and replay, with the provider being
defined in one place and the replay code to live in another. Both
contributed to the design of the provider info.
This patch refactors the reproducer info to be something static. This
means less magic strings and better type checking. The new design still
allows for the capture and replay code to live in different places as
long as they both have access to the new statically defined info class.
I didn't completely get rid of the index, because it is useful for (1)
sanity checking and (2) knowing what files are used by the reproducer.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56814
llvm-svn: 351501
As Pavel noted on the mailing list we should only create the bottom-most
directory if it doesn't exist. This should also fix the test case on
Windows as we can use lit's temp directory.
llvm-svn: 348289
This patch changes the way the reproducer is initialized. Rather than
making changes at run time we now do everything at initialization time.
To make this happen we had to introduce initializer options and their SB
variant. This allows us to tell the initializer that we're running in
reproducer capture/replay mode.
Because of this change we also had to alter our testing strategy. We
cannot reinitialize LLDB when using the dotest infrastructure. Instead
we use lit and invoke two instances of the driver.
Another consequence is that we can no longer enable capture or replay
through commands. This was bound to go away form the beginning, but I
had something in mind where you could enable/disable specific providers.
However this seems like it adds very little value right now so the
corresponding commands were removed.
Finally this change also means you now have to control this through the
driver, for which I replaced --reproducer with --capture and --replay to
differentiate between the two modes.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55038
llvm-svn: 348152
When I landed the initial reproducer framework I knew there were some
things that needed improvement. Rather than bundling it with a patch
that adds more functionality I split it off into this patch. I also
think the API is stable enough to add unit testing, which is included in
this patch as well.
Other improvements include:
- Refactor how we initialize the loader and generator.
- Improve naming consistency: capture and replay seems the least ambiguous.
- Index providers by name and make sure there's only one of each.
- Add convenience methods for creating and accessing providers.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54616
llvm-svn: 347716
Jonas Devlieghere