The previous implementation translated from names like sifive-7-series
to sifive-7-rv32 or sifive-7-rv64. This also required sifive-7-rv32
and sifive-7-rv64 to be valid CPU names. As those are not real
CPUs it doesn't make sense to accept them in -mcpu.
This patch does away with the translation and adds sifive-7-series
directly to RISCV.td. Removing sifive-7-rv32 and sifive-7-rv64.
sifive-7-series is only allowed in -mtune.
I've also added "rocket" to RISCV.td but have not removed rocket-rv32
or rocket-rv64.
To prevent -mcpu=sifive-7-series or -mcpu=rocket being used with llc,
I've added a Feature32Bit to all rv32 CPUs. And made it an error to
have an rv32 triple without Feature32Bit. sifive-7-series and rocket
do not have Feature32Bit or Feature64Bit set so the user would need
to provide -mattr=+32bit or -mattr=+64bit along with the -mcpu to
avoid the error.
SiFive no longer names their newer products with 3, 5, or 7 series.
Instead we have p200 series, x200 series, p500 series, and p600 series.
Following the previous behavior would require a sifive-p500-rv32 and
sifive-p500-rv64 in order to support -mtune=sifive-p500-series. There
is currently no p500 product, but it could start getting confusing if
there was in the future.
I'm open to hearing alternatives for how to achieve my main goal
of removing sifive-7-rv32/rv64 as a CPU name.
Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131708
This is the first patch of a series to upstream support for the new
subtarget.
Contributors:
Jay Foad <jay.foad@amd.com>
Konstantin Zhuravlyov <kzhuravl_dev@outlook.com>
Patch 1/N for upstreaming AMDGPU gfx11 architectures.
Reviewed By: foad, kzhuravl, #amdgpu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124536
1. Remove computeDefaultABIFromArch and add computeDefaultABI in
RISCVISAInfo.
2. Add parseFeatureBits which may used in D118333.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119250
These flags aren't used and we shouldn't add more flags for new
ratified extensions. So clear out the unused flags to avoid any
confusion.
Reviewed By: khchen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118294
A few more forward-declarations, a few less headers. the impact on number of
preprocessed lines for LLVMSupport is negligible (-3K lines) but it's always
good to remove dependencies.
Related discourse thread: https://llvm.discourse.group/t/include-what-you-use-include-cleanup
The cleanup was manual, but assisted by "include-what-you-use". It consists in
1. Removing unused forward declaration. No impact expected.
2. Removing unused headers in .cpp files. No impact expected.
3. Removing unused headers in .h files. This removes implicit dependencies and
is generally considered a good thing, but this may break downstream builds.
I've updated llvm, clang, lld, lldb and mlir deps, and included a list of the
modification in the second part of the commit.
4. Replacing header inclusion by forward declaration. This has the same impact
as 3.
Notable changes:
- llvm/Support/TargetParser.h no longer includes llvm/Support/AArch64TargetParser.h nor llvm/Support/ARMTargetParser.h
- llvm/Support/TypeSize.h no longer includes llvm/Support/WithColor.h
- llvm/Support/YAMLTraits.h no longer includes llvm/Support/Regex.h
- llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h no longer includes llvm/Support/MemAlloc.h nor llvm/Support/ErrorHandling.h
You may need to add some of these headers in your compilation units, if needs be.
As an hint to the impact of the cleanup, running
clang++ -E -Iinclude -I../llvm/include ../llvm/lib/Support/*.cpp -std=c++14 -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions | wc -l
before: 8000919 lines
after: 7917500 lines
Reduced dependencies also helps incremental rebuilds and is more ccache
friendly, something not shown by the above metric :-)
Discourse thread on the topic: https://llvm.discourse.group/t/include-what-you-use-include-cleanup/5831
Every generated IR has a corresponding target-abi value, so
encoding a non-empty value would improve the robustness and
correctness.
Reviewed By: asb, jrtc27, arichardson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105555
Handle branch protection option on the commandline as well as a function
attribute. One patch for both mechanisms, as they use the same underlying
parsing mechanism.
These are recorded in a set of LLVM IR module-level attributes like we do for
AArch64 PAC/BTI (see https://reviews.llvm.org/D85649):
- command-line options are "translated" to module-level LLVM IR
attributes (metadata).
- functions have PAC/BTI specific attributes iff the
__attribute__((target("branch-protection=...))) was used in the function
declaration.
- command-line option -mbranch-protection to armclang targeting Arm,
following this grammar:
branch-protection ::= "-mbranch-protection=" <protection>
protection ::= "none" | "standard" | "bti" [ "+" <pac-ret-clause> ]
| <pac-ret-clause> [ "+" "bti"]
pac-ret-clause ::= "pac-ret" [ "+" <pac-ret-option> ]
pac-ret-option ::= "leaf" ["+" "b-key"] | "b-key" ["+" "leaf"]
b-key is simply a placeholder to make it consistent with AArch64's
version. In Arm, however, it triggers a warning informing that b-key is
unsupported and a-key will be selected instead.
- Handle _attribute_((target(("branch-protection=..."))) for AArch32 with the
same grammer as the commandline options.
This patch is part of a series that adds support for the PACBTI-M extension of
the Armv8.1-M architecture, as detailed here:
https://community.arm.com/arm-community-blogs/b/architectures-and-processors-blog/posts/armv8-1-m-pointer-authentication-and-branch-target-identification-extension
The PACBTI-M specification can be found in the Armv8-M Architecture Reference
Manual:
https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ddi0553/latest
The following people contributed to this patch:
- Momchil Velikov
- Victor Campos
- Ties Stuij
Reviewed By: vhscampos
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112421
This differentiates the Ryzen 4000/4300/4500/4700 series APUs that were
previously included in gfx909.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90419
Change-Id: Ia901a7157eb2f73ccd9f25dbacec38427312377d
- The goal of this patch is improve option compatible with RISCV-V GCC,
-mcpu support on GCC side will sent patch in next few days.
- -mtune only affect the pipeline model and non-arch/extension related
target feature, e.g. instruction fusion; in td file it called
TuneFeatures, which is introduced by X86 back-end[1].
- -mtune accept all valid option for -mcpu and extra alias processor
option, e.g. `generic`, `rocket` and `sifive-7-series`, the purpose is
option compatible with RISCV-V GCC.
- Processor alias for -mtune will resolve according the current target arch,
rv32 or rv64, e.g. `rocket` will resolve to `rocket-rv32` or `rocket-rv64`.
- Interaction between -mcpu and -mtune:
* -mtune has higher priority than -mcpu for pipeline model and
TuneFeatures.
[1] https://reviews.llvm.org/D85165
Reviewed By: luismarques
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89025
At AMD, in an internal audit of our code, we found some corner cases
where we were not quite differentiating targets enough for some old
hardware. This commit is part of fixing that by adding three new
targets:
* The "Oland" and "Hainan" variants of gfx601 are now split out into
gfx602. LLPC (in the GPUOpen driver) and other front-ends could use
that to avoid using the shaderZExport workaround on gfx602.
* One variant of gfx703 is now split out into gfx705. LLPC and other
front-ends could use that to avoid using the
shaderSpiCsRegAllocFragmentation workaround on gfx705.
* The "TongaPro" variant of gfx802 is now split out into gfx805.
TongaPro has a faster 64-bit shift than its former friends in gfx802,
and a subtarget feature could be set up for that to take advantage of
it. This commit does not make that change; it just adds the target.
V2: Add clang changes. Put TargetParser list in order.
V3: AMDGCNGPUs table in TargetParser.cpp needs to be in GPUKind order,
so fix the GPUKind order.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88916
Change-Id: Ia901a7157eb2f73ccd9f25dbacec38427312377d
Summary:
1. gcc uses `-march` and `-mtune` flag to chose arch and
pipeline model, but clang does not have `-mtune` flag,
we uses `-mcpu` to chose both infos.
2. Add SiFive e31 and u54 cpu which have default march
and pipeline model.
3. Specific `-mcpu` with rocket-rv[32|64] would select
pipeline model only, and use the driver's arch choosing
logic to get default arch.
Reviewers: lenary, asb, evandro, HsiangKai
Reviewed By: lenary, asb, evandro
Tags: #llvm, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71124
Currently the library is separately linked, but this isn't correct to
implement fast math flags correctly. Each module should get the
version of the library appropriate for its combination of fast math
and related flags, with the attributes propagated into its functions
and internalized.
HIP already maintains the list of libraries, but this is not used for
OpenCL. Unfortunately, HIP uses a separate --hip-device-lib argument,
despite both languages using the same bitcode library. Eventually
these two searches need to be merged.
An additional problem is there are 3 different locations the libraries
are installed, depending on which build is used. This also needs to be
consolidated (or at least the search logic needs to deal with this
unnecessary complexity).
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
separate files to enable future changes.
This moves ARM and AArch64 target parsing into their
own files. They are still accessible through
TargetParser.h as before.
Several functions in AArch64 which were just forwarders to ARM
have been removed. All except AArch64::getFPUName were unused,
and that was only used in a test. Which itself was overlapping
one in ARM, so it has also been removed.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53980
llvm-svn: 347741
This adds the memory tagging extension, which is an optional extension
introduced in v8.5A. The new instructions and registers will be added by
subsequent patches.
Patch by Pablo Barrio!
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52486
llvm-svn: 343563
This adds two new system registers, used to generate random numbers.
This is an optional extension to v8.5-A, and will be controlled by the
"+rng" modifier of the -march= and -mcpu= options.
Patch by Pablo Barrio!
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52481
llvm-svn: 343217
Move isa version determination into TargetParser.
Also switch away from target features to CPU string when
determining isa version. This fixes an issue when we
output wrong isa version in the object code when features
of a particular CPU are altered (i.e. gfx902 w/o xnack
used to result in gfx900).
llvm-svn: 342069
into TargetParser.
Also switch away from target features to CPU string when
determining isa version. This fixes an issue when we
output wrong isa version in the object code when features
of a particular CPU are altered (i.e. gfx902 w/o xnack
used to result in gfx900).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51890
llvm-svn: 341982
A future change in clang necessitates access of this information
from the driver, so move this into a common place.
Try to mimic something resembling the API the other targets are
using here.
One thing I'm uncertain about is how to split amdgcn and r600
handling. Here I've mostly duplicated the functions for each,
while keeping the same enums. I think this is a bit awkward
for the features which don't matter for amdgcn.
It's also a bit messy that this isn't a complete set of
subtarget features. This is just the minimum set needed
for the driver code. For example building the list of
subtarget feature names is still in clang.
llvm-svn: 340291
Add +fp16fml feature for new FP16 instructions, which are a
mandatory part of FP16 from v8.4-A and an optional part of FP16
from v8.2-A. It doesn't seem to be possible to model this in
LLVM, but the relationship between the options is handled by
the related clang patch.
In keeping with what I think is the usual practice, the fp16fml
extension is accepted regardless of base architecture version.
Builds on/replaces Sjoerd Meijer's patch to add these instructions at
https://reviews.llvm.org/D49839.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50228
llvm-svn: 340013
This adds MC support for the crypto instructions that were made optional
extensions in Armv8.2-A (AArch64 only).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49370
llvm-svn: 338010
Initial patch adding assembly support for Armv8.4-A.
Besides adding v8.4 as a supported architecture to the usual places, this also
adds target features for the different crypto algorithms. Armv8.4-A introduced
new crypto algorithms, made them optional, and allows different combinations:
- none of the v8.4 crypto functions are supported, which is independent of the
implementation of the Armv8.0 SHA1 and SHA2 instructions.
- the v8.4 SHA512 and SHA3 support is implemented, in this case the Armv8.0
SHA1 and SHA2 instructions must also be implemented.
- the v8.4 SM3 and SM4 support is implemented, which is independent of the
implementation of the Armv8.0 SHA1 and SHA2 instructions.
- all of the v8.4 crypto functions are supported, in this case the Armv8.0 SHA1
and SHA2 instructions must also be implemented.
The v8.4 crypto instructions are added to AArch64 only, and not AArch32,
and are made optional extensions to Armv8.2-A.
The user-facing Clang options will map on these new target features, their
naming will be compatible with GCC and added in follow-up patches.
The Armv8.4-A instruction sets can be downloaded here:
https://developer.arm.com/products/architecture/a-profile/exploration-tools
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48625
llvm-svn: 335953
The implementation of shadow call stack on aarch64 is quite different to
the implementation on x86_64. Instead of reserving a segment register for
the shadow call stack, we reserve the platform register, x18. Any function
that spills lr to sp also spills it to the shadow call stack, a pointer to
which is stored in x18.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45239
llvm-svn: 329236
Aries
Archibald Elliott