This patch mechanically replaces None with std::nullopt where the
compiler would warn if None were deprecated. The intent is to reduce
the amount of manual work required in migrating from Optional to
std::optional.
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
This is a long-standing FIXME with a non-FMF test that exposes
the bug as shown in issue #57357.
It's possible that there's still a way to miscompile by
mis-identifying/mis-folding FP min/max patterns, but
this patch only exposes a couple of seemingly minor
regressions while preventing the broken transform.
D128820 stopped creating div/rem constant expressions by default;
this patch removes support for them entirely.
The getUDiv(), getExactUDiv(), getSDiv(), getExactSDiv(), getURem()
and getSRem() on ConstantExpr are removed, and ConstantExpr::get()
now only accepts binary operators for which
ConstantExpr::isSupportedBinOp() returns true. Uses of these methods
may be replaced either by corresponding IRBuilder methods, or
ConstantFoldBinaryOpOperands (if a constant result is required).
On the C API side, LLVMConstUDiv, LLVMConstExactUDiv, LLVMConstSDiv,
LLVMConstExactSDiv, LLVMConstURem and LLVMConstSRem are removed and
corresponding LLVMBuild methods should be used.
Importantly, this also means that constant expressions can no longer
trap! This patch still keeps the canTrap() method to minimize diff --
I plan to drop it in a separate NFC patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129148
This one tries to fix:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53357.
Simply, this one would check (x & y) and ~(x | y) in
haveNoCommonBitsSet. Since they shouldn't have common bits (we could
traverse the case by enumerating), and we could convert this one to (x &
y) | ~(x | y) . Then the compiler could handle it in
InstCombineAndOrXor.
Further more, since ((x & y) + (~x & ~y)) would be converted to ((x & y)
+ ~(x | y)), this patch would fix it too.
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/qsKzRS
Reviewed By: spatel, xbolva00, RKSimon, lebedev.ri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118094
Due to there are other required changes in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D118094, precommit these changes to ease
reviewing. Including:
- Remove *_thwart tests.
- Remove test for (x & y) + (~x & ~y)
- Fix incorrect uniitest committeed before
We should not lose analysis precision if an 'add' has both no-wrap
flags (nsw and nuw) compared to just one or the other.
This patch is modeled on a similar construct that was added with
D59386.
I don't think it is possible to expose a problem with an unsigned
compare because of the way this was coded (nuw is handled first).
InstCombine has an assert that fires with the example from:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/52884
...because it was expecting InstSimplify to handle this kind of
pattern with an smax.
Fixes#52884
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116322
There are several places in the code that are currently broken where
we assume an Instruction is always a member of a BasicBlock that
lives in a Function. This is a problem specifically when
attempting to get the vscale_range attribute. This patch adds checks
that an Instruction's parent also has a parent!
I've added a test for a function-less @llvm.vscale intrinsic call here:
unittests/Analysis/ValueTrackingTest.cpp
There are several places in the code that are currently broken as
they assume an Instruction always has a parent Function when
attempting to get the vscale_range attribute. This patch adds checks
that an Instruction has a parent.
I've added a test for a parentless @llvm.vscale intrinsic call here:
unittests/Analysis/ValueTrackingTest.cpp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110158
isValidAssumeForContext can provide better results with access to the
dominator tree in some cases. This patch adjusts computeConstantRange to
allow passing through a dominator tree.
The use VectorCombine is updated to pass through the DT to enable
additional scalarization.
Note that similar APIs like computeKnownBits already accept optional dominator
tree arguments.
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110175
ValueTracking should allow for value ranges that may satisfy
llvm.assume, instead of restricting the ranges only to values that
will always satisfy the condition.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107298
This can be seen as a follow up to commit 0ee439b705,
that changed the second argument of __powidf2, __powisf2 and
__powitf2 in compiler-rt from si_int to int. That was to align with
how those runtimes are defined in libgcc.
One thing that seem to have been missing in that patch was to make
sure that the rest of LLVM also handle that the argument now depends
on the size of int (not using the si_int machine mode for 32-bit).
When using __builtin_powi for a target with 16-bit int clang crashed.
And when emitting libcalls to those rtlib functions, typically when
lowering @llvm.powi), the backend would always prepare the exponent
argument as an i32 which caused miscompiles when the rtlib was
compiled with 16-bit int.
The solution used here is to use an overloaded type for the second
argument in @llvm.powi. This way clang can use the "correct" type
when lowering __builtin_powi, and then later when emitting the libcall
it is assumed that the type used in @llvm.powi matches the rtlib
function.
One thing that needed some extra attention was that when vectorizing
calls several passes did not support that several arguments could
be overloaded in the intrinsics. This patch allows overload of a
scalar operand by adding hasVectorInstrinsicOverloadedScalarOpd, with
an entry for powi.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99439
I'm not sure what behavior we want if the FP environment is
not default (also not sure if there's a way to enumerate
the full list of intrinsics programmatically), but currently
these are all defaulting to 'false' (doesn't propagate).
This is a patch teaching ValueTracking that `s/u*.with.overflow` intrinsics do not
create undef/poison and they propagate poison.
I couldn't write a nice example like the one with ctpop; ValueTrackingTest.cpp were simply updated
to check these instead.
This patch helps reducing regression while fixing https://llvm.org/pr49688 .
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99671
This is similar to D94106, but for the
isGuaranteedToTransferExecutionToSuccessor() helper. We should not
assume that readonly functions will return, as this is only true for
mustprogress functions (in which case we already infer willreturn).
As with the DCE change, for now continue assuming that readonly
intrinsics will return, as not all target intrinsics have been
annotated yet.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95288
Split impliesPoison into two recursive walks, one over V, the
other over ValAssumedPoison. This allows us to reason about poison
implications in a number of additional cases that are important
in practice. This is a generalized form of D94859, which handles
the cmp to cmp implication in particular.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94866
This patch
- Adds containsPoisonElement that checks existence of poison in constant vector elements,
- Renames containsUndefElement to containsUndefOrPoisonElement to clarify its behavior & updates its uses properly
With this patch, isGuaranteedNotToBeUndefOrPoison's tests w.r.t constant vectors are added because its analysis is improved.
Thanks!
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94053
This PR adds impliesPoison(ValAssumedPoison, V) that returns true if V is
poison under the assumption that ValAssumedPoison is poison.
For example, impliesPoison('icmp X, 10', 'icmp X, Y') return true because
'icmp X, Y' is poison if 'icmp X, 10' is poison.
impliesPoison can be used for sound optimization of select, as discussed in
D77868.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78152
This patch updates isImpliedCondition/isKnownNonZero to look into select form of
and/or as well.
See llvm.org/pr48353 and D93065 for more context
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93845
I noticed that alignment was no longer inferred as well after I last merged
our CHERI fork from upstream. I opened this review before seeing that D88669
already fixes the same problem, so this commit simply adds the new test that
I added as part of this change.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89830
Prior to this patch, computeKnownBits would only try to deduce trailing zeros
bits for getelementptrs. This patch adds the logic to treat geps as a series
of add * scaling factor.
Thanks to this patch, using a gep or performing an address computation
directly "by hand" (ptrtoint followed by adds and mul followed by inttoptr)
offers the same computeKnownBits information.
Previously, the "by hand" approach would have given more information.
This is related to https://llvm.org/PR47241.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86364
These tests make sure that the range information is properly
understood during computeKnownBits analysis.
NFC
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88934
It was mentioned that D88276 that when a phi node is visited, terminators at their incoming edges should be used for CtxI.
This is a patch that makes two functions (ComputeNumSignBitsImpl, isGuaranteedNotToBeUndefOrPoison) to do so.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88360
This is a patch that allows isGuaranteedNotToBeUndefOrPoison to return more precise result
when an argument is given, by looking through its uses at the entry block (and following blocks as well, if it is checking poison only).
This is useful when there is a function call with noundef arguments at the entry block.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88207
This implements support for isKnownNonZero, computeKnownBits when freeze is involved.
```
br (x != 0), BB1, BB2
BB1:
y = freeze x
```
In the above program, we can say that y is non-zero. The reason is as follows:
(1) If x was poison, `br (x != 0)` raised UB
(2) If x was fully undef, the branch again raised UB
(3) If x was non-zero partially undef, say `undef | 1`, `freeze x` will return a nondeterministic value which is also non-zero.
(4) If x was just a concrete value, it is trivial
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75808
This patch adds isGuaranteedNotToBePoison and programUndefinedIfUndefOrPoison.
isGuaranteedNotToBePoison will be used at D75808. The latter function is used at isGuaranteedNotToBePoison.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84242
For StackLifetime after finding alloca we need to check that
values ponting to the begining of alloca.
Reviewed By: eugenis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86692
This patch
- adds `canCreateUndefOrPoison`
- refactors `canCreatePoison` so it can deal with constantexprs
`canCreateUndefOrPoison` will be used at D83926.
Reviewed By: nikic, jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84007
This patch updates computeConstantRange to optionally take an assumption
cache as argument and use the available assumptions to limit the range
of the result.
Currently this is limited to assumptions that are comparisons.
Reviewers: reames, nikic, spatel, jdoerfert, lebedev.ri
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76193
computeKnownBitsFromAssume() currently asserts if m_V matches a
ptrtoint that changes the bitwidth. Because InstCombine
canonicalizes ptrtoint instructions to use explicit zext/trunc,
we never ran into the issue in practice. I'm adding unit tests,
as I don't know if this can be triggered via IR anywhere.
Fix this by calling anyextOrTrunc(BitWidth) on the computed
KnownBits. Note that we are going from the KnownBits of the
ptrtoint result to the KnownBits of the ptrtoint operand,
so we need to truncate if the ptrtoint zexted and anyext if
the ptrtoint truncated.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79234
Kazu Hirata