Summary: The fix for `auto` new expression is illegal.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54832
llvm-svn: 347551
Summary:
The fix for aggregate initialization (`std::make_unique<Foo>(Foo {1, 2})` needs
to see Foo copy constructor, otherwise we will have a compiler error. So we
only emit the check warning.
Reviewers: JonasToth, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54745
llvm-svn: 347537
Summary:
Currently the smart_ptr check (modernize-make-unique) generates the
fixes that cannot compile for cases like below -- because brace list can
not be deduced in `make_unique`.
```
struct Bar { int a, b; };
struct Foo { Foo(Bar); };
auto foo = std::unique_ptr<Foo>(new Foo({1, 2}));
```
Reviewers: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54704
llvm-svn: 347315
Summary:
Previously, ptr.reset(new char[5]) will be replaced with `p =
make_unique<char[]>(5)`, the fix has side effect -- doing
default initialization, it may cause performace regression (we are
bitten by this rececntly)
The check should be conservative for these cases.
Reviewers: alexfh
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53377
llvm-svn: 344733
Summary:
Extra parentheses around a new expression result in incorrect code
after applying fixes.
Reviewers: hokein
Reviewed By: hokein
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52989
llvm-svn: 344058
Summary:
Previously, we tried to cover all "std::initializer_list" implicit conversion
cases in the code, but there are some corner cases that not covered (see
newly-added test in the patch).
Sipping all implicit AST nodes is a better way to filter out all these cases.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: klimek, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44137
llvm-svn: 326799
Summary:
A follow-up fix of rL311652.
The previous `vector` in our test is different with `std::vector`, so
The check still generates fixes for std::vector (`auto p =
std::unique_ptr<Foo>(new Foo({1,2,3}))`) in real world, the patch makes the
vector behavior in test align with std::vector (both AST nodes are the same now).
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov, alexfh
Reviewed By: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: klimek, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41852
llvm-svn: 322822
Summary:
The current fix will break the compilation -- because braced list is not
deducible in std::make_unique (with the use of forwarding) without
specifying the type explicitly.
We could support it in the future.
Reviewers: alexfh
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36786
llvm-svn: 311078
Summary:
The crash happens when calling `reset` method without any preceding
operation like "->" or ".", this could happen in a subclass of the
"std::unique_ptr".
Reviewers: alexfh
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36452
llvm-svn: 310496
Summary:
The check doesn't fully support smart-ptr usages inside macros, which
may cause incorrect fixes, or even crashes, ignore them for now.
Reviewers: alexfh
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36264
llvm-svn: 310050
Summary:
If the class being created in unique_ptr is in anonymous nampespace, the
anonymous namespace will be included in the apply-fixes. This patch fix
this.
```
namespace {
class Foo {};
}
std::unique_ptr<Foo> f;
f.reset(new Foo());
// Before the change: f = std::make_unique<(annonymous namespace)::Foo>();
// After the change: f = std::make_unique<Foo>();
```
Reviewers: alexfh
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34286
llvm-svn: 306378
Summary:
Bugfix for 27321. When the constructor of stored pointer
type is private then it is invalid to change it to
make_shared or make_unique.
Reviewers: alexfh, aaron.ballman, hokein
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23343
llvm-svn: 280180
Summary: "std::unique_ptr<int>" is not the same type as "std::unique_ptr<int, std::default_delete<int>>", unless we insert a "hasCanonicalType" in the middle. Probably it also happens in other cases related to default template argument.
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: alexfh, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14291
llvm-svn: 252041
Summary: Take into account the current LangOptions the check has to add back the template argument.
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: alexfh, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13983
llvm-svn: 251013
With this, site specific lit configs can inject parameters into the
test scripts if they need site specific parameters.
Next up: enable check_clang_tidy to take a resource dir to enable
non-standard locations for builtin includes.
llvm-svn: 251010
Summary: modernize-make-unique now correctly supports the different kinds of list initialization.
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits, alexfh
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13590
llvm-svn: 250283
Summary: Add the second template argument to the unique_ptr mock, and update the matcher so that it only matches against cases where the second argument is the default.
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: alexfh, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13433
llvm-svn: 249305
Summary: create a check that replaces 'std::unique_ptr<type>(new type(args...))' with 'std::make_unique<type>(args...)'. It was on the list of "Ideas for new Tools". It needs to be tested more carefully, but first I wanted to know if you think it is worth the effort.
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13166
llvm-svn: 248785
Haojian Wu