ClangCheckerRegistry is a very non-obvious, poorly documented, weird concept.
It derives from CheckerRegistry, and is placed in lib/StaticAnalyzer/Frontend,
whereas it's base is located in lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core. It was, from what I can
imagine, used to circumvent the problem that the registry functions of the
checkers are located in the clangStaticAnalyzerCheckers library, but that
library depends on clangStaticAnalyzerCore. However, clangStaticAnalyzerFrontend
depends on both of those libraries.
One can make the observation however, that CheckerRegistry has no place in Core,
it isn't used there at all! The only place where it is used is Frontend, which
is where it ultimately belongs.
This move implies that since
include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/ClangCheckers.h only contained a single function:
class CheckerRegistry;
void registerBuiltinCheckers(CheckerRegistry ®istry);
it had to re purposed, as CheckerRegistry is no longer available to
clangStaticAnalyzerCheckers. It was renamed to BuiltinCheckerRegistration.h,
which actually describes it a lot better -- it does not contain the registration
functions for checkers, but only those generated by the tblgen files.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54436
llvm-svn: 349275
Extend the alpha.core.Conversion checker to handle implicit converions
where a too large integer value is converted to a floating point type. Each
floating point type has a range where it can exactly represent all integers; we
emit a warning when the integer value is above this range. Although it is
possible to exactly represent some integers which are outside of this range
(those that are divisible by a large enough power of 2); we still report cast
involving those, because their usage may lead to bugs. (For example, if 1<<24
is stored in a float variable x, then x==x+1 holds.)
Patch by: Donát Nagy!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52730
llvm-svn: 347006
Summary:
The alpha.core.Conversion was too strict about compound assignments and could warn even though there is no problem.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25596
llvm-svn: 299523
This new checker tries to find execution paths on which implicit integral casts
cause definite loss of information: a certainly-negative integer is converted
to an unsigned integer, or an integer is definitely truncated to fit into
a smaller type.
Being implicit, such casts are likely to produce unexpected results.
Patch by Daniel Marjamäki!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D13126
llvm-svn: 278941
Kristof Umann