This is intentionally a small step because it's hard to know exactly
where we might introduce a conflicting transform with the code that
tries to form wider shuffles. But I think this is safe - if we have
a wide shuffle with 2 operands, then we should do better with an
extract + narrow shuffle.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57867
llvm-svn: 353427
combineExtractWithShuffle may leave a dangling bitcast which may
prevent further optimization in later passes. Avoid constructing it
unless it is used.
llvm-svn: 353333
The proposal in D56796 may cross the line because we're trying to avoid vectorization
transforms in generic DAG combining. So this is an alternate, later, x86-specific
translation of that patch.
There are several potential follow-ups to enhance this:
1. Allow extraction from non-zero element index.
2. Peek through extends of smaller width integers.
3. Support x86-specific conversion opcodes like X86ISD::CVTSI2P
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56864
llvm-svn: 353302
rL352997 enabled ZERO_EXTEND from non-shuffle-able value types. I've disabled it for now to fix a regression identified by @asbirlea until I can fix this properly.
llvm-svn: 353198
If we have broadcasts of different vector widths, keep the longest vector width and extract subvectors for the shorter vectors (which should be free).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57663
llvm-svn: 353154
Summary:
We don't currently map these constraints to physical register numbers so they don't make it to the MachineIR representation of inline assembly.
This could have problems for proper dependency tracking in the machine schedulers though I don't have a test case that shows that.
Reviewers: rnk
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: eraman, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57641
llvm-svn: 353141
For PCMPGT(0, X) patterns where we only demand the sign bit (e.g. BLENDV or MOVMSK) then we can use X directly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57667
llvm-svn: 353051
Summary:
Add an additional combine to combineCarryThroughADD to reverse it back to the C flag to avoid regressions.
I believe this catches the cases that D57547 got.
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: javed.absar, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57637
llvm-svn: 352984
Push the insert_subvector up through the shuffle operands to help find more cross-lane shuffles.
The is exposes a couple of minor issues that will be fixed shortly:
Missed broadcast folds - we have a mixture of vzext_load lengths that need cleaning up
combine-sdiv.ll - AVX1 SimplifyDemandedVectorElts failure (hits max depth due to a couple of extra bitcasts).
llvm-svn: 352963
We already have the getConstantOperandVal helper which returns a uint64_t, but along comes the fuzzer and inserts a i128 -1 constant or something and the whole thing asserts.......
I've updated a few obvious cases, and tried to make use of the const reference where possible, but there's more to do. A number of existing oss-fuzz tickets should be fixed if we start using APInt and perform value clamping where necessary.
llvm-svn: 352961
This cleans up all LoadInst creation in LLVM to explicitly pass the
value type rather than deriving it from the pointer's element-type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57172
llvm-svn: 352911
This cleans up all CallInst creation in LLVM to explicitly pass a
function type rather than deriving it from the pointer's element-type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57170
llvm-svn: 352909
As suggested on PR40318, this patch uses PSLLDQ/PSRLDQ to lower shuffles to zero out the ends of a vector, leaving a sequential inner section.
For pre-SSSE3 we do this for shuffles with zeros at either end (requiring up to 3 shifts), but once PSHUFB is available I've limited this to shuffles with a single zeroable end (2 shifts).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56784
llvm-svn: 352883
Enable peeking through one use bitcasts to the subvector shuffle.
This still depends on the subvector being the same scalar-size but D57514 has already helped with the more tricky patterns
llvm-svn: 352879
Recommit r352791 after tweaking DerivedTypes.h slightly, so that gcc
doesn't choke on it, hopefully.
Original Message:
The FunctionCallee type is effectively a {FunctionType*,Value*} pair,
and is a useful convenience to enable code to continue passing the
result of getOrInsertFunction() through to EmitCall, even once pointer
types lose their pointee-type.
Then:
- update the CallInst/InvokeInst instruction creation functions to
take a Callee,
- modify getOrInsertFunction to return FunctionCallee, and
- update all callers appropriately.
One area of particular note is the change to the sanitizer
code. Previously, they had been casting the result of
`getOrInsertFunction` to a `Function*` via
`checkSanitizerInterfaceFunction`, and storing that. That would report
an error if someone had already inserted a function declaraction with
a mismatching signature.
However, in general, LLVM allows for such mismatches, as
`getOrInsertFunction` will automatically insert a bitcast if
needed. As part of this cleanup, cause the sanitizer code to do the
same. (It will call its functions using the expected signature,
however they may have been declared.)
Finally, in a small number of locations, callers of
`getOrInsertFunction` actually were expecting/requiring that a brand
new function was being created. In such cases, I've switched them to
Function::Create instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57315
llvm-svn: 352827
This reverts commit f47d6b38c7 (r352791).
Seems to run into compilation failures with GCC (but not clang, where
I tested it). Reverting while I investigate.
llvm-svn: 352800
The FunctionCallee type is effectively a {FunctionType*,Value*} pair,
and is a useful convenience to enable code to continue passing the
result of getOrInsertFunction() through to EmitCall, even once pointer
types lose their pointee-type.
Then:
- update the CallInst/InvokeInst instruction creation functions to
take a Callee,
- modify getOrInsertFunction to return FunctionCallee, and
- update all callers appropriately.
One area of particular note is the change to the sanitizer
code. Previously, they had been casting the result of
`getOrInsertFunction` to a `Function*` via
`checkSanitizerInterfaceFunction`, and storing that. That would report
an error if someone had already inserted a function declaraction with
a mismatching signature.
However, in general, LLVM allows for such mismatches, as
`getOrInsertFunction` will automatically insert a bitcast if
needed. As part of this cleanup, cause the sanitizer code to do the
same. (It will call its functions using the expected signature,
however they may have been declared.)
Finally, in a small number of locations, callers of
`getOrInsertFunction` actually were expecting/requiring that a brand
new function was being created. In such cases, I've switched them to
Function::Create instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57315
llvm-svn: 352791
Similar to what we already do in DAGCombiner, but this version also handles bitcasts from types with different scalar sizes, which x86 is better at handling.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57514
llvm-svn: 352773
Enables 32/64-bit scalar load broadcasts on AVX1 targets
The extractelement-load.ll regression will be fixed shortly in a followup commit.
llvm-svn: 352743
If we're not inserting the broadcast into the lowest subvector then we can avoid the insertion by just performing a larger broadcast.
Avoids a regression when we enable AVX1 broadcasts in shuffle combining
llvm-svn: 352742
I believe this was there to handle avx512bw intrinsics that returned i64 type in 32-bit mode. But all those intrinsics have since been changed to v64i1 results or replaced with generic IR.
llvm-svn: 352698
Without the fix we get the following (with -Werror):
../lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp:14181:58: error: suggest braces around initialization of subobject [-Werror,-Wmissing-braces]
SmallVector<std::array<int, 2>, 2> LaneSrcs(NumLanes, {-1, -1});
^~~~~~
{ }
1 error generated.
llvm-svn: 352455
This did not cause the buildbot failure it was previously reverted for.
Original commit message:
I'm not sure why we were using SEXTLOAD. EXTLOAD seems more appropriate since we don't care about the upper bits.
This patch changes this and then modifies the X86 post legalization combine to emit a extending shuffle instead of a sign_extend_vector_inreg. Could maybe use an any_extend_vector_inre
On AVX512 targets I think we might be able to use a masked vpmovzx and not have to expand this at all.
llvm-svn: 352433
First step towards adding support for 64-bit unary "sublane" handling (a bit like lowerShuffleAsRepeatedMaskAndLanePermute).
This allows us to add lowerV64I8Shuffle handling.
llvm-svn: 352389
This is tricky to make optimal: sometimes we're better off using
a single wider op, but other times it makes more sense to combine
a narrow ops to achieve the same result.
This solves the case from:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40434
There's potentially a similar change for vectors with 64-bit elements,
but it needs adjustments similar to rL352333 to avoid creating infinite
loops.
llvm-svn: 352380
This transform was added with rL351346, and we had
an escape for shufps, but we also want one for
unpckps vs. vpermps because vpermps doesn't take
an immediate shuffle index operand.
llvm-svn: 352333
Although this is longer code, this is no-functional-change-intended.
The goal is to untangle the conditions under which we bail out, so
that's easier to adjust.
llvm-svn: 352320
Fix issue noted in D57281 that only tested the one use for the SDValue (the result flag), not the entire SUB.
I've added the getNode() to make it clearer what is intended than just the -> redirection.
llvm-svn: 352291
As discussed on PR24545, we should try to commute X86::COND_A 'icmp ugt' cases to X86::COND_B 'icmp ult' to more optimally bind the carry flag output to a SBB instruction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57281
llvm-svn: 352289
We often generate X86ISD::SBB(X, 0) for carry flag arithmetic.
I had tried to create test cases for the ADC equivalent (which often uses the same pattern) but haven't managed to find anything yet.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57169
llvm-svn: 352288
This reduces a bit of duplication between the combining and
lowering places that use it, but the primary motivation is
to make it easier to rearrange the lowering logic and solve
PR40434:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40434
llvm-svn: 352280
Summary: We have isel patterns for this, but we're missing some load patterns and all broadcast patterns. A DAG combine seems like a better fit for this.
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56971
llvm-svn: 352260
Sanjay Patel