Similar to D46745, "S" represents an absolute symbolic operand, which
can be used to specify the access models, e.g.
extern int var;
void *addr_via_asm() {
void *ret;
asm("lui %0, %%hi(%1)\naddi %0,%0,%%lo(%1)" : "=r"(ret) : "S"(&var));
return ret;
}
'S' is documented in trunk GCC: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101275
Reviewed By: luismarques
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105254
The backend can't handle this and will throw a fatal error from
type legalization. It's easy enough to fix that for this intrinsic
by just splitting the IR intrinsic since it works on individual bytes.
There will be other intrinsics in the future that would be harder
to support through splitting, for example grev, gorc, and shfl. Those
would require a compare and a select be inserted to check the MSB of
their control input.
This patch adds support for preventing this in the frontend with
a nice diagnostic.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99984
Use that to print the diagnostic in SemaChecking instead of
listing all of the builtins in a switch.
With the required features, IR generation will also be able
to error on this. Checking this here allows us to have a RISCV
focused error message.
Reviewed By: HsiangKai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97826
Demonstrate how to add RISC-V V builtins and lower them to IR intrinsics for V extension.
Authored-by: Roger Ferrer Ibanez <rofirrim@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-by: Hsiangkai Wang <kai.wang@sifive.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93446
The RISCV target did not set the GCC atomic compare and swap defines,
unlike other targets. This broke builds for things like glib on RISCV.
Patch by Kristof Provost (kprovost)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91784
- The goal of this patch is improve option compatible with RISCV-V GCC,
-mcpu support on GCC side will sent patch in next few days.
- -mtune only affect the pipeline model and non-arch/extension related
target feature, e.g. instruction fusion; in td file it called
TuneFeatures, which is introduced by X86 back-end[1].
- -mtune accept all valid option for -mcpu and extra alias processor
option, e.g. `generic`, `rocket` and `sifive-7-series`, the purpose is
option compatible with RISCV-V GCC.
- Processor alias for -mtune will resolve according the current target arch,
rv32 or rv64, e.g. `rocket` will resolve to `rocket-rv32` or `rocket-rv64`.
- Interaction between -mcpu and -mtune:
* -mtune has higher priority than -mcpu for pipeline model and
TuneFeatures.
[1] https://reviews.llvm.org/D85165
Reviewed By: luismarques
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89025
Summary:
1. gcc uses `-march` and `-mtune` flag to chose arch and
pipeline model, but clang does not have `-mtune` flag,
we uses `-mcpu` to chose both infos.
2. Add SiFive e31 and u54 cpu which have default march
and pipeline model.
3. Specific `-mcpu` with rocket-rv[32|64] would select
pipeline model only, and use the driver's arch choosing
logic to get default arch.
Reviewers: lenary, asb, evandro, HsiangKai
Reviewed By: lenary, asb, evandro
Tags: #llvm, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71124
RISC-V LLVM was only implement small/medlow code model, so it defined
__riscv_cmodel_medlow directly without check.
Now, we have medium/medany code model in RISC-V back-end, it should
define according the actually code model.
Reviewed By: lewis-revill
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67065
llvm-svn: 372078
Summary:
GCC seperates the `__riscv_float_abi_*` macros and the
`__riscv_abi_rve` macro. If the chosen abi is ilp32e, `gcc -march=rv32i
-mabi=ilp32i -E -dM` shows that both `__riscv_float_abi_soft` and
`__riscv_abi_rve` are set.
This patch corrects the compiler logic around these defines.
At the moment, this patch will not change clang's behaviour, because we do not
accept the `ilp32e` abi yet.
Reviewers: luismarques, asb
Reviewed By: luismarques
Subscribers: rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, rkruppe, PkmX, jocewei, psnobl, benna, Jim, s.egerton, pzheng, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66591
llvm-svn: 370709
This allows the constraint A to be used in inline asm for RISC-V, which
allows an address held in a register to be used.
This patch adds the minimal amount of code required to get operands with
the right constraints to compile.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54295
llvm-svn: 369093
Summary:
This adds the 'f' inline assembly constraint, as supported by GCC. An
'f'-constrained operand is passed in a floating point register. Exactly
which kind of floating-point register (32-bit or 64-bit) is decided
based on the operand type and the available standard extensions (-f and
-d, respectively).
This patch adds support in both the clang frontend, and LLVM itself.
Reviewers: asb, lewis-revill
Reviewed By: asb
Subscribers: hiraditya, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, rkruppe, PkmX, jocewei, psnobl, benna, Jim, s.egerton, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65500
llvm-svn: 367403
This adds support for parsing/emitting in IR the floating-point RISC-V
registers in inline assembly clobber lists.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64737
llvm-svn: 367399
The RISC-V hard float calling convention requires the frontend to:
* Detect cases where, once "flattened", a struct can be passed using
int+fp or fp+fp registers under the hard float ABI and coerce to the
appropriate type(s)
* Track usage of GPRs and FPRs in order to gate the above, and to
determine when signext/zeroext attributes must be added to integer
scalars
This patch attempts to do this in compliance with the documented ABI,
and uses ABIArgInfo::CoerceAndExpand in order to do this. @rjmccall, as
author of that code I've tagged you as reviewer for initial feedback on
my usage.
Note that a previous version of the ABI indicated that when passing an
int+fp struct using a GPR+FPR, the int would need to be sign or
zero-extended appropriately. GCC never did this and the ABI was changed,
which makes life easier as ABIArgInfo::CoerceAndExpand can't currently
handle sign/zero-extension attributes.
Re-landed after backing out 366450 due to missed hunks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60456
llvm-svn: 366480
The RISC-V hard float calling convention requires the frontend to:
* Detect cases where, once "flattened", a struct can be passed using
int+fp or fp+fp registers under the hard float ABI and coerce to the
appropriate type(s) * Track usage of GPRs and FPRs in order to gate the
above, and to
determine when signext/zeroext attributes must be added to integer
scalars
This patch attempts to do this in compliance with the documented ABI,
and uses ABIArgInfo::CoerceAndExpand in order to do this. @rjmccall, as
author of that code I've tagged you as reviewer for initial feedback on
my usage.
Note that a previous version of the ABI indicated that when passing an
int+fp struct using a GPR+FPR, the int would need to be sign or
zero-extended appropriately. GCC never did this and the ABI was changed,
which makes life easier as ABIArgInfo::CoerceAndExpand can't currently
handle sign/zero-extension attributes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60456
llvm-svn: 366450
This allows the constraints I, J & K to be used in inline asm for
RISC-V, with the following semantics (equivalent to GCC):
I: Any 12-bit signed immediate.
J: Integer zero only.
K: Any 5-bit unsigned immediate.
See the GCC definitions here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gccint/Machine-Constraints.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54091
llvm-svn: 363055
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary:
This patch extend getTargetDefines and implement handleTargetFeatures
and hasFeature. and define corresponding marco for those features.
Reviewers: asb, apazos, eli.friedman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44727
Patch by Kito Cheng.
llvm-svn: 329278
As RV64 codegen has not yet been upstreamed into LLVM, we focus on RV32 driver
support (RV64 to follow).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39963
llvm-svn: 322276
Hsiangkai Wang