Use _Float16 as the half-precision floating point type. Define a new
type specifier 'x' for the _Float16 type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105001
The backend can't handle this and will throw a fatal error from
type legalization. It's easy enough to fix that for this intrinsic
by just splitting the IR intrinsic since it works on individual bytes.
There will be other intrinsics in the future that would be harder
to support through splitting, for example grev, gorc, and shfl. Those
would require a compare and a select be inserted to check the MSB of
their control input.
This patch adds support for preventing this in the frontend with
a nice diagnostic.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99984
Demonstrate how to add RISC-V V builtins and lower them to IR intrinsics for V extension.
Authored-by: Roger Ferrer Ibanez <rofirrim@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-by: Hsiangkai Wang <kai.wang@sifive.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93446
Add the types for the RISC-V V extension builtins.
These types will be used by the RISC-V V intrinsics which require
types of the form <vscale x 1 x i64>(LMUL=1 element size=64) or
<vscale x 4 x i32>(LMUL=2 element size=32), etc. The vector_size
attribute does not work for us as it doesn't create a scalable
vector type. We want these types to be opaque and have no operators
defined for them. We want them to be sizeless. This makes them
similar to the ARM SVE builtin types. But we will have quite a bit
more types. This patch adds around 60. Later patches will add
another 230 or so types representing tuples of these types similar
to the x2/x3/x4 types in ARM SVE. But with extra complexity that
these types are combined with the LMUL concept that is unique to
RISCV.
For more background see this RFC
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-October/145850.html
Authored-by: Roger Ferrer Ibanez <roger.ferrer@bsc.es>
Co-Authored-by: Hsiangkai Wang <kai.wang@sifive.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92715
This avoids having to repeat all the flags in the constructor's
initializer list in the same order. This style is already used by
several other targets.
- The goal of this patch is improve option compatible with RISCV-V GCC,
-mcpu support on GCC side will sent patch in next few days.
- -mtune only affect the pipeline model and non-arch/extension related
target feature, e.g. instruction fusion; in td file it called
TuneFeatures, which is introduced by X86 back-end[1].
- -mtune accept all valid option for -mcpu and extra alias processor
option, e.g. `generic`, `rocket` and `sifive-7-series`, the purpose is
option compatible with RISCV-V GCC.
- Processor alias for -mtune will resolve according the current target arch,
rv32 or rv64, e.g. `rocket` will resolve to `rocket-rv32` or `rocket-rv64`.
- Interaction between -mcpu and -mtune:
* -mtune has higher priority than -mcpu for pipeline model and
TuneFeatures.
[1] https://reviews.llvm.org/D85165
Reviewed By: luismarques
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89025
Summary:
1. gcc uses `-march` and `-mtune` flag to chose arch and
pipeline model, but clang does not have `-mtune` flag,
we uses `-mcpu` to chose both infos.
2. Add SiFive e31 and u54 cpu which have default march
and pipeline model.
3. Specific `-mcpu` with rocket-rv[32|64] would select
pipeline model only, and use the driver's arch choosing
logic to get default arch.
Reviewers: lenary, asb, evandro, HsiangKai
Reviewed By: lenary, asb, evandro
Tags: #llvm, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71124
This is the result of an audit of all of the ABIs in clang to implement
and enable the type for those targets.
Additionally, this finds an issue with integer-promotion passing for a
few platforms when using _ExtInt of < int, so this also corrects that
resulting in signext/zeroext being on a params of those types in some
platforms.
Differential Revisions: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79118
Summary: This ensures that libcalls aren't generated when the target supports atomics. Atomics aren't in the base RV32I/RV64I instruction sets, so MaxAtomicInlineWidth and MaxAtomicPromoteWidth are set only when the atomics extension is being targeted. This must be done in setMaxAtomicWidth, as this should be done after handleTargetFeatures has been called.
Reviewers: jfb, jyknight, wmi, asb
Reviewed By: asb
Subscribers: pzheng, MaskRay, s.egerton, lenary, dexonsmith, psnobl, benna, Jim, JohnLLVM, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, jrtc27, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, rkruppe, PkmX, jocewei, lewis-revill, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57450
llvm-svn: 370073
The RISC-V hard float calling convention requires the frontend to:
* Detect cases where, once "flattened", a struct can be passed using
int+fp or fp+fp registers under the hard float ABI and coerce to the
appropriate type(s)
* Track usage of GPRs and FPRs in order to gate the above, and to
determine when signext/zeroext attributes must be added to integer
scalars
This patch attempts to do this in compliance with the documented ABI,
and uses ABIArgInfo::CoerceAndExpand in order to do this. @rjmccall, as
author of that code I've tagged you as reviewer for initial feedback on
my usage.
Note that a previous version of the ABI indicated that when passing an
int+fp struct using a GPR+FPR, the int would need to be sign or
zero-extended appropriately. GCC never did this and the ABI was changed,
which makes life easier as ABIArgInfo::CoerceAndExpand can't currently
handle sign/zero-extension attributes.
Re-landed after backing out 366450 due to missed hunks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60456
llvm-svn: 366480
The RISC-V hard float calling convention requires the frontend to:
* Detect cases where, once "flattened", a struct can be passed using
int+fp or fp+fp registers under the hard float ABI and coerce to the
appropriate type(s) * Track usage of GPRs and FPRs in order to gate the
above, and to
determine when signext/zeroext attributes must be added to integer
scalars
This patch attempts to do this in compliance with the documented ABI,
and uses ABIArgInfo::CoerceAndExpand in order to do this. @rjmccall, as
author of that code I've tagged you as reviewer for initial feedback on
my usage.
Note that a previous version of the ABI indicated that when passing an
int+fp struct using a GPR+FPR, the int would need to be sign or
zero-extended appropriately. GCC never did this and the ABI was changed,
which makes life easier as ABIArgInfo::CoerceAndExpand can't currently
handle sign/zero-extension attributes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60456
llvm-svn: 366450
This allows the constraints I, J & K to be used in inline asm for
RISC-V, with the following semantics (equivalent to GCC):
I: Any 12-bit signed immediate.
J: Integer zero only.
K: Any 5-bit unsigned immediate.
See the GCC definitions here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gccint/Machine-Constraints.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54091
llvm-svn: 363055
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary:
This patch extend getTargetDefines and implement handleTargetFeatures
and hasFeature. and define corresponding marco for those features.
Reviewers: asb, apazos, eli.friedman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44727
Patch by Kito Cheng.
llvm-svn: 329278
As RV64 codegen has not yet been upstreamed into LLVM, we focus on RV32 driver
support (RV64 to follow).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39963
llvm-svn: 322276
Hsiangkai Wang