i.e., recent 5745eccef54ddd3caca278d1d292a88b2281528b:
* Bump the function_type_mismatch handler version, as its signature has changed.
* The function_type_mismatch handler can return successfully now, so
SanitizerKind::Function must be AlwaysRecoverable (like for
SanitizerKind::Vptr).
* But the minimal runtime would still unconditionally treat a call to the
function_type_mismatch handler as failure, so disallow -fsanitize=function in
combination with -fsanitize-minimal-runtime (like it was already done for
-fsanitize=vptr).
* Add tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61479
llvm-svn: 366186
Add "memtag" sanitizer that detects and mitigates stack memory issues
using armv8.5 Memory Tagging Extension.
It is similar in principle to HWASan, which is a software implementation
of the same idea, but there are enough differencies to warrant a new
sanitizer type IMHO. It is also expected to have very different
performance properties.
The new sanitizer does not have a runtime library (it may grow one
later, along with a "debugging" mode). Similar to SafeStack and
StackProtector, the instrumentation pass (in a follow up change) will be
inserted in all cases, but will only affect functions marked with the
new sanitize_memtag attribute.
Reviewers: pcc, hctim, vitalybuka, ostannard
Subscribers: srhines, mehdi_amini, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, cryptoad, steven_wu, dexonsmith, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64169
llvm-svn: 366123
D63793 removed float-divide-by-zero from the "undefined" set but it
failed to add it to getSupportedSanitizers(), thus the sanitizer is
rejected by the driver:
clang-9: error: unsupported option '-fsanitize=float-divide-by-zero' for target 'x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu'
Also, add SanitizerMask::FloatDivideByZero to a few other masks to make -fsanitize-trap, -fsanitize-recover, -fsanitize-minimal-runtime and -fsanitize-coverage work.
Reviewed By: rsmith, vitalybuka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64317
llvm-svn: 365587
Disabled by default as this is still an experimental feature.
Reviewed By: thakis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59221
llvm-svn: 358285
It hasn't seen active development in years, and it hasn't reached a
state where it was useful.
Remove the code until someone is interested in working on it again.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59133
llvm-svn: 355862
enum SanitizerOrdinal has reached maximum capacity, this change extends the capacity to 128 sanitizer checks.
This can eventually allow us to add gcc 8's options "-fsanitize=pointer-substract" and "-fsanitize=pointer-compare".
This is a recommit of r354873 but with a fix for unqualified lookup error in lldb cmake build bot.
Fixes: https://llvm.org/PR39425
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57914
llvm-svn: 355190
enum SanitizerOrdinal has reached maximum capacity, this change extends the capacity to 128 sanitizer checks.
This can eventually allow us to add gcc 8's options "-fsanitize=pointer-substract" and "-fsanitize=pointer-compare".
Fixes: https://llvm.org/PR39425
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57914
llvm-svn: 354873
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary:
Adds a new -f[no]split-lto-unit flag that is disabled by default to
control module splitting during ThinLTO. It is automatically enabled
for -fsanitize=cfi and -fwhole-program-vtables.
The new EnableSplitLTOUnit codegen flag is passed down to llvm
via a new module flag of the same name.
Depends on D53890.
Reviewers: pcc
Subscribers: ormris, mehdi_amini, inglorion, eraman, steven_wu, dexonsmith, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53891
llvm-svn: 350949
The problem is similar to D55986 but for threads: a process with the
interceptor hwasan library loaded might have some threads started by
instrumented libraries and some by uninstrumented libraries, and we
need to be able to run instrumented code on the latter.
The solution is to perform per-thread initialization lazily. If a
function needs to access shadow memory or add itself to the per-thread
ring buffer its prologue checks to see whether the value in the
sanitizer TLS slot is null, and if so it calls __hwasan_thread_enter
and reloads from the TLS slot. The runtime does the same thing if it
needs to access this data structure.
This change means that the code generator needs to know whether we
are targeting the interceptor runtime, since we don't want to pay
the cost of lazy initialization when targeting a platform with native
hwasan support. A flag -fsanitize-hwaddress-abi={interceptor,platform}
has been introduced for selecting the runtime ABI to target. The
default ABI is set to interceptor since it's assumed that it will
be more common that users will be compiling application code than
platform code.
Because we can no longer assume that the TLS slot is initialized,
the pthread_create interceptor is no longer necessary, so it has
been removed.
Ideally, lazy initialization should only cost one instruction in the
hot path, but at present the call may cause us to spill arguments
to the stack, which means more instructions in the hot path (or
theoretically in the cold path if the spills are moved with shrink
wrapping). With an appropriately chosen calling convention for
the per-thread initialization function (TODO) the hot path should
always need just one instruction and the cold path should need two
instructions with no spilling required.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56038
llvm-svn: 350429
Because SCS relies on system-provided runtime support, we can use it
together with any other sanitizer simply by linking the runtime for
the other sanitizer.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54735
llvm-svn: 347282
Handle it in the driver and propagate it to cc1
Reviewers: rjmccall, kcc, rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52615
llvm-svn: 346001
Boilerplate code for using KMSAN instrumentation in Clang.
We add a new command line flag, -fsanitize=kernel-memory, with a
corresponding SanitizerKind::KernelMemory, which, along with
SanitizerKind::Memory, maps to the memory_sanitizer feature.
KMSAN is only supported on x86_64 Linux.
It's incompatible with other sanitizers, but supports code coverage
instrumentation.
llvm-svn: 341641
Summary:
C and C++ are interesting languages. They are statically typed, but weakly.
The implicit conversions are allowed. This is nice, allows to write code
while balancing between getting drowned in everything being convertible,
and nothing being convertible. As usual, this comes with a price:
```
unsigned char store = 0;
bool consume(unsigned int val);
void test(unsigned long val) {
if (consume(val)) {
// the 'val' is `unsigned long`, but `consume()` takes `unsigned int`.
// If their bit widths are different on this platform, the implicit
// truncation happens. And if that `unsigned long` had a value bigger
// than UINT_MAX, then you may or may not have a bug.
// Similarly, integer addition happens on `int`s, so `store` will
// be promoted to an `int`, the sum calculated (0+768=768),
// and the result demoted to `unsigned char`, and stored to `store`.
// In this case, the `store` will still be 0. Again, not always intended.
store = store + 768; // before addition, 'store' was promoted to int.
}
// But yes, sometimes this is intentional.
// You can either make the conversion explicit
(void)consume((unsigned int)val);
// or mask the value so no bits will be *implicitly* lost.
(void)consume((~((unsigned int)0)) & val);
}
```
Yes, there is a `-Wconversion`` diagnostic group, but first, it is kinda
noisy, since it warns on everything (unlike sanitizers, warning on an
actual issues), and second, there are cases where it does **not** warn.
So a Sanitizer is needed. I don't have any motivational numbers, but i know
i had this kind of problem 10-20 times, and it was never easy to track down.
The logic to detect whether an truncation has happened is pretty simple
if you think about it - https://godbolt.org/g/NEzXbb - basically, just
extend (using the new, not original!, signedness) the 'truncated' value
back to it's original width, and equality-compare it with the original value.
The most non-trivial thing here is the logic to detect whether this
`ImplicitCastExpr` AST node is **actually** an implicit conversion, //or//
part of an explicit cast. Because the explicit casts are modeled as an outer
`ExplicitCastExpr` with some `ImplicitCastExpr`'s as **direct** children.
https://godbolt.org/g/eE1GkJ
Nowadays, we can just use the new `part_of_explicit_cast` flag, which is set
on all the implicitly-added `ImplicitCastExpr`'s of an `ExplicitCastExpr`.
So if that flag is **not** set, then it is an actual implicit conversion.
As you may have noted, this isn't just named `-fsanitize=implicit-integer-truncation`.
There are potentially some more implicit conversions to be warned about.
Namely, implicit conversions that result in sign change; implicit conversion
between different floating point types, or between fp and an integer,
when again, that conversion is lossy.
One thing i know isn't handled is bitfields.
This is a clang part.
The compiler-rt part is D48959.
Fixes [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21530 | PR21530 ]], [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37552 | PR37552 ]], [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35409 | PR35409 ]].
Partially fixes [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9821 | PR9821 ]].
Fixes https://github.com/google/sanitizers/issues/940. (other than sign-changing implicit conversions)
Reviewers: rjmccall, rsmith, samsonov, pcc, vsk, eugenis, efriedma, kcc, erichkeane
Reviewed By: rsmith, vsk, erichkeane
Subscribers: erichkeane, klimek, #sanitizers, aaron.ballman, RKSimon, dtzWill, filcab, danielaustin, ygribov, dvyukov, milianw, mclow.lists, cfe-commits, regehr
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48958
llvm-svn: 338288
Similarly to CFI on virtual and indirect calls, this implementation
tries to use program type information to make the checks as precise
as possible. The basic way that it works is as follows, where `C`
is the name of the class being defined or the target of a call and
the function type is assumed to be `void()`.
For virtual calls:
- Attach type metadata to the addresses of function pointers in vtables
(not the functions themselves) of type `void (B::*)()` for each `B`
that is a recursive dynamic base class of `C`, including `C` itself.
This type metadata has an annotation that the type is for virtual
calls (to distinguish it from the non-virtual case).
- At the call site, check that the computed address of the function
pointer in the vtable has type `void (C::*)()`.
For non-virtual calls:
- Attach type metadata to each non-virtual member function whose address
can be taken with a member function pointer. The type of a function
in class `C` of type `void()` is each of the types `void (B::*)()`
where `B` is a most-base class of `C`. A most-base class of `C`
is defined as a recursive base class of `C`, including `C` itself,
that does not have any bases.
- At the call site, check that the function pointer has one of the types
`void (B::*)()` where `B` is a most-base class of `C`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47567
llvm-svn: 335569
Summary:
This is the clang side of the change, there is a compiler-rt counterpart.
Scudo works with UBSan using `-fsanitize=scudo,integer` for example, and to do
so it embeds UBSan runtime. This makes it not compatible with the UBSan minimal
runtime, but this is something we want for production purposes.
The idea is to have a Scudo minimal runtime on the compiler-rt side that will
not embed UBSan. This is basically the runtime that is currently in use for
Fuchsia, without coverage, stacktraces or symbolization. With this, Scudo
becomes compatible with `-fsanitize-minimal-runtime`.
If this approach is suitable, I'll add the tests as well, otherwise I am open
to other options.
Reviewers: eugenis
Reviewed By: eugenis
Subscribers: llvm-commits, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48373
llvm-svn: 335352
NFC for targets other than PS4.
This patch is a change in behavior for PS4, in that PS4 will no longer enable
RTTI when -fexceptions is specified (RTTI and Exceptions are disabled by default
on PS4). RTTI will remain disabled except for types being thrown or caught.
Also, '-fexceptions -fno-rtti' (previously prohibited on PS4) is now accepted,
as it is for other targets.
This patch removes some PS4 specific code, making the code cleaner.
Also, in the test file rtti-options.cpp, PS4 tests where the behavior is the
same as the generic x86_64-linux are removed, making the test cleaner.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46982
llvm-svn: 332784
Currently LLVM CFI tries to use an implicit blacklist file, currently
in /usr/lib64/clang/<version>/share. If the file is not there, LLVM
happily continues, which causes CFI to add checks to files/functions
that are known to fail, generating binaries that fail. This CL causes
LLVM to die (I hope) if it can't find these implicit blacklist files.
Patch by Caroline Tice!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46403
llvm-svn: 331674
The implementation of shadow call stack on aarch64 is quite different to
the implementation on x86_64. Instead of reserving a segment register for
the shadow call stack, we reserve the platform register, x18. Any function
that spills lr to sp also spills it to the shadow call stack, a pointer to
which is stored in x18.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45239
llvm-svn: 329236
Summary:
Add support for the -fsanitize=shadow-call-stack flag which causes clang
to add ShadowCallStack attribute to functions compiled with that flag
enabled.
Reviewers: pcc, kcc
Reviewed By: pcc, kcc
Subscribers: cryptoad, cfe-commits, kcc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44801
llvm-svn: 329122
Summary: Porting HWASan to Linux x86-64, the third of the three patches, clang part.
Reviewers: eugenis
Subscribers: cryptoad, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44745
llvm-svn: 328361
When a sanitizer incompatible with one of the default sanitizers
is explicitly enabled, automatically disable all the conflicting
default sanitizers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44064
llvm-svn: 326860
This allows reporting an error when user tries to use SafeStack with
incompatible sanitizers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43606
llvm-svn: 326151
Ideally, we'd only use the ubsan blacklist for ubsan sanitizers, and only use
the other-sanitizer blacklist for its sanitizers, but this at least enables the
intended suppressions.
llvm-svn: 325640
Summary:
This change adds Scudo as a possible Sanitizer option via -fsanitize=.
This allows for easier static & shared linking of the Scudo library, it allows
us to enforce PIE (otherwise the security of the allocator is moot), and check
for incompatible Sanitizers combo.
In its current form, Scudo is not compatible with any other Sanitizer, but the
plan is to make it work in conjunction with UBsan (-fsanitize=scudo,undefined),
which will require additional work outside of the scope of this change.
Reviewers: eugenis, kcc, alekseyshl
Reviewed By: eugenis, alekseyshl
Subscribers: llvm-commits, srhines
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39334
llvm-svn: 317337
Summary:
This change allows generalizing pointers in type signatures used for
cfi-icall by enabling the -fsanitize-cfi-icall-generalize-pointers flag.
This works by 1) emitting an additional generalized type signature
metadata node for functions and 2) llvm.type.test()ing for the
generalized type for translation units with the flag specified.
This flag is incompatible with -fsanitize-cfi-cross-dso because it would
require emitting twice as many type hashes which would increase artifact
size.
Reviewers: pcc, eugenis
Reviewed By: pcc
Subscribers: kcc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39358
llvm-svn: 317044
Summary:
Also enable -no-pie on Gnu toolchain (previously available on Darwin only).
Non-PIE executables won't even start on recent Android, and DT_RPATH is ignored by the loader.
Reviewers: srhines, danalbert
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38430
llvm-svn: 316606
Summary:
The OS provides cross-dso CFI support starting with Android O.
Trapping mode does not require any runtime at all, and diagnostic mode
requires just ubsan-standalone.
Reviewers: pcc
Subscribers: srhines, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38908
llvm-svn: 315921
Summary:
* Rename -shared-libasan to -shared-libsan, keeping the old name as alias.
* Add -static-libsan for targets that default to shared.
* Remove an Android special case. It is now possible (but untested) to use static compiler-rt libraries there.
* Support libclang_rt.ubsan_standalone as a shared library.
Unlike GCC, this change applies -shared-libsan / -static-libsan to all sanitizers.
I don't see a point in multiple flags like -shared-libubsan, considering that most sanitizers
are not compatible with each other, and each link has basically a single shared/static choice.
Reviewers: vitalybuka, kcc, rsmith
Subscribers: srhines, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38525
llvm-svn: 315015
Summary:
An implementation of ubsan runtime library suitable for use in production.
Minimal attack surface.
* No stack traces.
* Definitely no C++ demangling.
* No UBSAN_OPTIONS=log_file=/path (very suid-unfriendly). And no UBSAN_OPTIONS in general.
* as simple as possible
Minimal CPU and RAM overhead.
* Source locations unnecessary in the presence of (split) debug info.
* Values and types (as in A+B overflows T) can be reconstructed from register/stack dumps, once you know what type of error you are looking at.
* above two items save 3% binary size.
When UBSan is used with -ftrap-function=abort, sometimes it is hard to reason about failures. This library replaces abort with a slightly more informative message without much extra overhead. Since ubsan interface in not stable, this code must reside in compiler-rt.
Reviewers: pcc, kcc
Subscribers: srhines, mgorny, aprantl, krytarowski, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36810
llvm-svn: 312029
Summary:
Augment SanitizerCoverage to insert maximum stack depth tracing for
use by libFuzzer. The new instrumentation is enabled by the flag
-fsanitize-coverage=stack-depth and is compatible with the existing
trace-pc-guard coverage. The user must also declare the following
global variable in their code:
thread_local uintptr_t __sancov_lowest_stack
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33857
Reviewers: vitalybuka, kcc
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Subscribers: kubamracek, hiraditya, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36839
llvm-svn: 311186
The flag will perform instrumentation necessary to the fuzzing,
but will NOT link libLLVMFuzzer.a library.
Necessary when modifying CFLAGS for projects which may produce
executables as well as a fuzzable target.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36600
llvm-svn: 310733
Summary:
This is to provide a default blacklist filename for UBSan.
While UBSan is turned on, it's better that clang pick up a blacklist file (when exists), just as what ASan / MSan does, so we do not end up adding the "-fsanitize-blacklist" option to every command line.
Reviewers: chandlerc, echristo, vsk, eugenis
Reviewed By: vsk, eugenis
Subscribers: vsk, eugenis, echristo, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35849
llvm-svn: 309873
In r309007, I made -fsanitize=null a hard prerequisite for -fsanitize=vptr. I
did not see the need for the two checks to have separate null checking logic
for the same pointer. I expected the two checks to either always be enabled
together, or to be mutually compatible.
In the mailing list discussion re: r309007 it became clear that that isn't the
case. If a codebase is -fsanitize=vptr clean but not -fsanitize=null clean,
it's useful to have -fsanitize=vptr emit its own null check. That's what this
patch does: with it, -fsanitize=vptr can be used without -fsanitize=null.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36112
llvm-svn: 309846
The instrumentation generated by -fsanitize=vptr does not null check a
user pointer before loading from it. This causes crashes in the face of
UB member calls (this=nullptr), i.e it's causing user programs to crash
only after UBSan is turned on.
The fix is to make run-time null checking a prerequisite for enabling
-fsanitize=vptr, and to then teach UBSan to reuse these run-time null
checks to make -fsanitize=vptr safe.
Testing: check-clang, check-ubsan, a stage2 ubsan-enabled build
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35735https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33881
llvm-svn: 309007
The driver ignores -fsanitize-coverage=... flags when also given
-fsanitize=... flags for sanitizer flavors that don't support the
coverage runtime. This logic failed to account for subsequent
-fno-sanitize=... flags that disable the sanitizer flavors that
conflict with -fsanitize-coverage=... flags.
Patch by Roland McGrath
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35603
llvm-svn: 308707
This check currently isn't able to diagnose any issues at -O0, not is it
likely to [1]. Disabling the check at -O0 leads to substantial compile
time and binary size savings.
[1] [cfe-dev] Disabling ubsan's object size check at -O0
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34563
llvm-svn: 306181
This feature is subtly broken when the linker is gold 2.26 or
earlier. See the following bug for details:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19002
Since the decision needs to be made at compilation time, we can not
test the linker version. The flag is off by default on ELF targets,
and on otherwise.
llvm-svn: 302591
When enabling any sanitizer, -fsanitize-use-after-scope is enabled by
default. This doesn't actually turn ASan on, because we've been getting
lucky and there are extra checks in BackendUtil that stop this from
happening.
However, this has been causing a behavior change: extra lifetime markers
are emitted in some cases where they aren't needed or expected.
llvm-svn: 302468
Previously, adding libfuzzer to a project was a multi-step procedure,
involving libfuzzer compilation, linking the library, and specifying
coverage flags.
With this change,libfuzzer can be enabled by adding a single
-fsanitize=fuzzer flag instead.
llvm-svn: 301212
Teach UBSan to detect when a value with the _Nonnull type annotation
assumes a null value. Call expressions, initializers, assignments, and
return statements are all checked.
Because _Nonnull does not affect IRGen, the new checks are disabled by
default. The new driver flags are:
-fsanitize=nullability-arg (_Nonnull violation in call)
-fsanitize=nullability-assign (_Nonnull violation in assignment)
-fsanitize=nullability-return (_Nonnull violation in return stmt)
-fsanitize=nullability (all of the above)
This patch builds on top of UBSan's existing support for detecting
violations of the nonnull attributes ('nonnull' and 'returns_nonnull'),
and relies on the compiler-rt support for those checks. Eventually we
will need to update the diagnostic messages in compiler-rt (there are
FIXME's for this, which will be addressed in a follow-up).
One point of note is that the nullability-return check is only allowed
to kick in if all arguments to the function satisfy their nullability
preconditions. This makes it necessary to emit some null checks in the
function body itself.
Testing: check-clang and check-ubsan. I also built some Apple ObjC
frameworks with an asserts-enabled compiler, and verified that we get
valid reports.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30762
llvm-svn: 297700
Summary:
(This is a move-only refactoring patch. There are no functionality changes.)
This patch splits apart the Clang driver's tool and toolchain implementation
files. Each target platform toolchain is moved to its own file, along with the
closest-related tools. Each target platform toolchain has separate headers and
implementation files, so the hierarchy of classes is unchanged.
There are some remaining shared free functions, mostly from Tools.cpp. Several
of these move to their own architecture-specific files, similar to r296056. Some
of them are only used by a single target platform; since the tools and
toolchains are now together, some helpers now live in a platform-specific file.
The balance are helpers related to manipulating argument lists, so they are now
in a new file pair, CommonArgs.h and .cpp.
I've tried to cluster the code logically, which is fairly straightforward for
most of the target platforms and shared architectures. I think I've made
reasonable choices for these, as well as the various shared helpers; but of
course, I'm happy to hear feedback in the review.
There are some particular things I don't like about this patch, but haven't been
able to find a better overall solution. The first is the proliferation of files:
there are several files that are tiny because the toolchain is not very
different from its base (usually the Gnu tools/toolchain). I think this is
mostly a reflection of the true complexity, though, so it may not be "fixable"
in any reasonable sense. The second thing I don't like are the includes like
"../Something.h". I've avoided this largely by clustering into the current file
structure. However, a few of these includes remain, and in those cases it
doesn't make sense to me to sink an existing file any deeper.
Reviewers: rsmith, mehdi_amini, compnerd, rnk, javed.absar
Subscribers: emaste, jfb, danalbert, srhines, dschuff, jyknight, nemanjai, nhaehnle, mgorny, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30372
llvm-svn: 297250
Summary:
Sanitizers aren't supported on NVPTX -- don't try to run them.
This lets you e.g. pass -fsanitize=address and get asan on your host
code.
Reviewers: kcc
Subscribers: cfe-commits, tra, jhen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24640
llvm-svn: 281680
This reverts commit r275895 in order to address some post-commit review
feedback from Eric Christopher (see: the list thread for r275895).
llvm-svn: 276936
Compute an effective target triple exactly once in ConstructJob(), and
then simply pass around references to it. This eliminates wasteful
re-computation of effective triples (e.g in getARMFloatABI()).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22290
llvm-svn: 275895
The reason is that this (a) seems to work just fine and (b) useful when building stuff with
sanitizer+coverage, but need to exclude the sanitizer for a particular source file.
llvm-svn: 272717
Stephan Bergmann