Currently we have MemoryAccess function that accepts
"bool kAccessIsWrite, bool kIsAtomic" and 4 wrappers:
MemoryRead/MemoryWrite/MemoryReadAtomic/MemoryWriteAtomic.
Such scheme with bool flags is not particularly scalable/extendable.
Because of that we did not have Read/Write wrappers for UnalignedMemoryAccess,
and "true, false" or "false, true" at call sites is not very readable.
Moreover, the new tsan runtime will introduce more flags
(e.g. move "freed" and "vptr access" to memory acccess flags).
We can't have 16 wrappers and each flag also takes whole
64-bit register for non-inlined calls.
Introduce AccessType enum that contains bit mask of
read/write, atomic/non-atomic, and later free/non-free,
vptr/non-vptr.
Such scheme is more scalable, more readble, more efficient
(don't consume multiple registers for these flags during calls)
and allows to cover unaligned and range variations of memory
access functions as well.
Also switch from size log to just size.
The new tsan runtime won't have the limitation of supporting
only 1/2/4/8 access sizes, so we don't need the logarithms.
Also add an inline thunk that converts the new interface to the old one.
For inlined calls it should not add any overhead because
all flags/size can be computed as compile time.
Reviewed By: vitalybuka, melver
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107276
Currently we inconsistently use u32 and int for thread ids,
there are also "unique tid" and "os tid" and just lots of other
things identified by integers.
Additionally new tsan runtime will introduce yet another
thread identifier that is very different from current tids.
Similarly for stack IDs, it's easy to confuse u32 with other
integer identifiers. And when a function accepts u32 or a struct
contains u32 field, it's not always clear what it is.
Add Tid and StackID typedefs to make it clear what is what.
Reviewed By: melver
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107152
Dmitry Vyukov