Commit Graph

10 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Nikita Popov c795dd1926 [BasicAA] Pass AC/DT to isKnownNonEqual()
This allows us to handle assumes etc in the recursive
isKnownNonZero() checks.
2020-12-25 18:29:20 +01:00
Nikita Popov a3614a31c4 [BasicAA] Pass context instruction to isKnownNonZero()
This allows us to handle additional cases like assumes.
2020-12-25 12:58:19 +01:00
Nikita Popov bb939ebfd7 [BasicAA] Handle known non-zero variable index
BasicAA currently handles cases like Scale*V0 + (-Scale)*V1 where
V0 != V1, but does not handle the simpler case of Scale*V with
V != 0. Add it based on an isKnownNonZero() call.

I'm not passing a context instruction for now, because the existing
approach of always using GEP1 for context could result in symmetry
issues.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93162
2020-12-13 13:20:05 +01:00
Nikita Popov b0ce2b72e8 [BasicAA] Add tests for non-zero var index (NFC) 2020-12-12 15:00:46 +01:00
Nikita Popov 5e69e2ebad [BasicAA] Migrate "same base pointer" logic to decomposed GEPs
BasicAA has some special bit of logic for "same base pointer" GEPs
that performs a structural comparison: It only looks at two GEPs
with the same base (as opposed to two GEP chains with a MustAlias
base) and compares their indexes in a limited way. I generalized
part of this code in D91027, and this patch merges the remainder
into the normal decomposed GEP logic.

What this code ultimately wants to do is to determine that
gep %base, %idx1 and gep %base, %idx2 don't alias if %idx1 != %idx2,
and the access size fits within the stride.

We can express this in terms of a decomposed GEP expression with
two indexes scale*%idx1 + -scale*%idx2 where %idx1 != %idx2, and
some appropriate checks for sizes and offsets.

This makes the reasoning slightly more powerful, and more
importantly brings all the GEP logic under a common umbrella.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92723
2020-12-06 10:27:35 +01:00
Nikita Popov ae5e013f6e [BasicAA] Add more tests for non-equal index (NFC) 2020-12-05 21:22:57 +01:00
Arthur Eubanks feeed16a5f [NewPM][BasicAA] basicaa -> basic-aa in Analysis/BasicAA
Following https://reviews.llvm.org/D82607.

Reviewed By: ychen

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82683
2020-06-26 14:58:01 -07:00
Michael Kruse 47f856095a [BasicAA] Use MayAlias instead of PartialAlias for fallback.
Using various methods, BasicAA tries to determine whether two
GetElementPtr memory locations alias when its base pointers are known
to be equal. When none of its heuristics are applicable, it falls back
to PartialAlias to, according to a comment, protect TBAA making a wrong
decision in case of unions and malloc. PartialAlias is not correct,
because a PartialAlias result implies that some, but not all, bytes
overlap which is not necessarily the case here.

AAResults returns the first analysis result that is not MayAlias.
BasicAA is always the first alias analysis. When it returns
PartialAlias, no other analysis is queried to give a more exact result
(which was the intention of returning PartialAlias instead of MayAlias).
For instance, ScopedAA could return a more accurate result.

The PartialAlias hack was introduced in r131781 (and re-applied in
r132632 after some reverts) to fix llvm.org/PR9971 where TBAA returns a
wrong NoAlias result due to a union. A test case for the malloc case
mentioned in the comment was not provided and I don't think it is
affected since it returns an omnipotent char anyway.

Since r303851 (https://reviews.llvm.org/D33328) clang does emit specific
TBAA for unions anymore (but "omnipotent char" instead). Hence, the
PartialAlias workaround is not required anymore.

This patch passes the test-suite and check-llvm/check-clang of a
self-hoisted build on x64.

Reviewed By: hfinkel

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34318

llvm-svn: 305938
2017-06-21 18:25:37 +00:00
James Molloy 05a896a8d1 [BasicAA] Bugfix for r251016
If the loaded type sizes don't match the element type of the sequential type, all bets are off and the addresses may, indeed, overlap.

Surprisingly, this just got caught in one test, on one builder, out of the 30+ builders testing this change. Congratulations go to http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-aarch64-lnt/builds/5205.

llvm-svn: 251112
2015-10-23 14:17:03 +00:00
James Molloy 5a4d8cd519 [BasicAA] Non-equal indices in a GEP of a SequentialType don't overlap
If the final indices of two GEPs can be proven to not be equal, and
the GEP is of a SequentialType (not a StructType), then the two GEPs
do not alias.

llvm-svn: 251016
2015-10-22 13:28:18 +00:00