We normally select these when the root node is a sext_inreg, but
SimplifyDemandedBits can sometimes bypass the sext_inreg for some
users. This can create situation where sext_inreg+add/sub/mul/shl
is selected to a W instruction, and then the add/sub/mul/shl is
separately selected to a non-W instruction with the same inputs.
This patch tries to detect when it would still be ok to use a W
instruction without the sext_inreg by checking the direct users.
This can allow the W instruction to CSE with one created for a
sext_inreg+add/sub/mul/shl. To minimize complexity and cost of
checking, we make no attempt to determine if the CSE will happen
and just always use a W instruction when we can.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107658
If we need to shift left anyway we might be able to take advantage
of LUI implicitly shifting its immediate left by 12 to cover part
of the shift. This allows us to use more bits of the LUI immediate
to avoid an ADDI.
isDesirableToCommuteWithShift now considers compressed instruction
opportunities when deciding if commuting should be allowed.
I believe this is the same or similar to one of the optimizations
from D79492.
Reviewed By: luismarques, arcbbb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105417
Most of the test changes are trivial instruction reorderings and differing
register allocations, without any obvious performance impact.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66973
llvm-svn: 372106
Summary:
Ana Pazos reported a bug where we were not checking that an APInt would
fit into 64-bits before calling `getSExtValue()`. This caused asserts when
compiling large constants, such as i128s, as happens when compiling compiler-rt.
This patch adds a testcase and makes the callback less error-prone.
Reviewers: apazos, asb, luismarques
Reviewed By: luismarques
Subscribers: hiraditya, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, sabuasal, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, rkruppe, PkmX, jocewei, psnobl, benna, Jim, s.egerton, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66081
llvm-svn: 368572
Summary:
There was an error being thrown from isDesirableToCommuteWithShift in
some tests. This was tracked down to the method being called before
legalisation, with an extended value type, not a machine value type.
In the case I diagnosed, the error was only hit with an instruction sequence
involving `i24`s in the add and shift. `i24` is not a Machine ValueType, it is
instead an Extended ValueType which was causing the issue.
I have added a test to cover this case, and fixed the error in the callback.
Reviewers: asb, luismarques
Reviewed By: asb
Subscribers: hiraditya, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, rkruppe, PkmX, jocewei, psnobl, benna, Jim, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64425
llvm-svn: 365511
Summary:
DAGCombine will normally turn a `(shl (add x, c1), c2)` into `(add (shl x, c2), c1 << c2)`, where `c1` and `c2` are constants. This can be prevented by a callback in TargetLowering.
On RISC-V, materialising the constant `c1 << c2` can be more expensive than materialising `c1`, because materialising the former may take more instructions, and may use a register, where materialising the latter would not.
This patch implements the hook in RISCVTargetLowering to prevent this transform, in the cases where:
- `c1` fits into the immediate field in an `addi` instruction.
- `c1` takes fewer instructions to materialise than `c1 << c2`.
In future, DAGCombine could do the check to see whether `c1` fits into an add immediate, which might simplify more targets hooks than just RISC-V.
Reviewers: asb, luismarques, efriedma
Reviewed By: asb
Subscribers: xbolva00, lebedev.ri, craig.topper, lewis-revill, Jim, hiraditya, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, jrtc27, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, rkruppe, PkmX, jocewei, psnobl, benna, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62857
llvm-svn: 363736
Craig Topper