Follow-up to D107068, attempt to fold nested concat_vectors/undefs, as long as both the vector and inner subvector types are legal.
This exposed the same issue in ARM's MVE LowerCONCAT_VECTORS_i1 (raised as PR51365) and AArch64's performConcatVectorsCombine which both assumed concat_vectors only took 2 subvector operands.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107597
In most of cases, it has a single space after comma in assembly operands.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103790
This guarantees they meet this overlap exception:
"The destination EEW is smaller than the source EEW and the overlap
is in the lowest-numbered part of the source register group"
Being a single register guarantees the overlap is always in the
lowerst-number part of the group.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck, khchen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103351
This can help avoid needing a virtual register for the vsetvl output
when the AVL is X0. For other register AVLs it can shorter the live
range of the AVL register if it isn't needed later.
There's probably no advantage when AVL is a 5 bit immediate that
can use vsetivli. But do it anyway for consistency.
Reviewed By: rogfer01
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103215
We aren't going to connect the result to anything so we might
as well avoid allocating a register.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck, HsiangKai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102031
My thought process is that if v2i64 is an LMUL=1 type then v2i32
should be an LMUL=1/2 type. We limit the fractional LMUL so that
SEW=64 clips to LMUL=1, SEW=32 clips to LMUL=1/2, etc. This
ensures there's always a fractional LMUL available to truncate a type.
This does reduce the number of vsetvlis in some cases.
Some tests increase vsetvlis because the best container type for a
mask type is dependent on the LMUL+SEW that the mask was produced
from, but you can't tell that from the type. I think this is
something we need to solve this in the machine IR when optimizing
vsetvlis.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101215
This adds a special operand type that is allowed to be either
an immediate or register. By giving it a unique operand type the
machine verifier will ignore it.
This perturbs a lot of tests but mostly it is just slightly different
instruction orders. Something bad did happen to some min/max reduction
tests. We're spilling vector registers when we weren't before.
Reviewed By: khchen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101246
As noted in the FIXME there's a sort of agreement that the any
extra bits stored will be 0.
The generated code is pretty terrible. I was really hoping we
could use a tail undisturbed trick, but tail undisturbed no
longer applies to masked destinations in the current draft
spec.
Fingers crossed that it isn't common to do this. I doubt IR
from clang or the vectorizer would ever create this kind of store.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100618
Caught in internal testing, these operations are assumed legal by
default, even for scalable vector types. Expand them back into separate
truncations and stores, or loads and extensions.
Also add explicit fixed-length vector tests for these operations, even
though they should have been correct already.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99654
Simon Pilgrim