For unit-stride and strided load/stores we set the SEW operand of
the pseudo instruction equal the EEW in the opcode. The LMUL
of the pseudo instruction is the LMUL we want.
These instructions calculate EMUL=(EEW/SEW) * LMUL. We can use
this to avoid changing vtype if the SEW/LMUL of the previous
vtype matches the EEW/EMUL ratio we need for the instruction.
Due to how the global analysis works, we can only do this
optimization when the previous vsetvli was produced in the block
containing the store. We need to know in the first phase if the
vsetvli will be inserted so we can propagate information to
the successors in the second phase correctly. This means we can't
depend on predecessors.
Reviewed By: rogfer01
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106601
In most of cases, it has a single space after comma in assembly operands.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103790
This can help avoid needing a virtual register for the vsetvl output
when the AVL is X0. For other register AVLs it can shorter the live
range of the AVL register if it isn't needed later.
There's probably no advantage when AVL is a 5 bit immediate that
can use vsetivli. But do it anyway for consistency.
Reviewed By: rogfer01
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103215
We aren't going to connect the result to anything so we might
as well avoid allocating a register.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck, HsiangKai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102031
My thought process is that if v2i64 is an LMUL=1 type then v2i32
should be an LMUL=1/2 type. We limit the fractional LMUL so that
SEW=64 clips to LMUL=1, SEW=32 clips to LMUL=1/2, etc. This
ensures there's always a fractional LMUL available to truncate a type.
This does reduce the number of vsetvlis in some cases.
Some tests increase vsetvlis because the best container type for a
mask type is dependent on the LMUL+SEW that the mask was produced
from, but you can't tell that from the type. I think this is
something we need to solve this in the machine IR when optimizing
vsetvlis.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101215
We always create the VL operand using a register, but if we can
determine that it came from an ADDI X0, imm with a sufficiently
small immediate, we can use VSETIVLI.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97332
This is an alternative to D95563.
This is modeled after a similar feature for AArch64's SVE that uses
predicated scalable vector instructions.a
Rather than use predication, this patch uses an explicit VL operand.
I've limited it to always use LMUL=1 for now, but we can improve this
in the future.
This requires a bunch of new ISD opcodes to carry the VL operand.
I think we can probably lower intrinsics to these ISD opcodes to
cut down on the size of the isel table. Which is why I've added
patterns for all integer/float types and not just LMUL=1.
I'm only testing one vector width right now, but the width is
programmable via the command line.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95705
Craig Topper