This patch optimizes the code generation of vector-type SELECTs (LLVM
select instructions with scalar conditions) by custom-lowering to
VSELECTs (LLVM select instructions with vector conditions) by splatting
the condition to a vector. This avoids the default expansion path which
would either introduce control flow or fully scalarize.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104772
In most of cases, it has a single space after comma in assembly operands.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103790
In 0.9 these were defined to leave elements other than 0 in the
destination unmodified. They were changed to use the tail policy
in 0.10. I missed that update.
I assume no one has noticed because in order cores treat tail
agnostic the same as tail undisturbed. I believe Spike and QEMU do
the same.
Reviewed By: arcbbb, frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103736
This patch addresses an issue in which fixed-length (VLS) vector RVV
code could fail to reserve an emergency spill slot for their frame index
elimination. This is because we were previously only reserving a spill
slot when there were `scalable-vector` frame indices being used.
However, fixed-length codegen uses regular-type frame indices if it
needs to spill.
This patch does the fairly brute-force method of checking ahead of time
whether the function contains any RVV spill instructions, in which case
it reserves one slot. Note that the second RVV slot is still only
reserved for `scalable-vector` frame indices.
This unfortunately causes quite a bit of churn in existing tests, where
we chop and change stack offsets for spill slots.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103269
We aren't going to connect the result to anything so we might
as well avoid allocating a register.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck, HsiangKai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102031
This patch extends D102737 to allow VL/VTYPE changes to be taken
into account before adding an explicit vsetvli.
We do this by using a data flow analysis to propagate VL/VTYPE
information from predecessors until we've determined a value for
every value in the function.
We use this information to determine if a vsetvli needs to be
inserted before the first vector instruction the block.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102739
This is a replacement for D101938 for inserting vsetvli
instructions where needed. This new version changes how
we track the information in such a way that we can extend
it to be aware of VL/VTYPE changes in other blocks. Given
how much it changes the previous patch, I've decided to
abandon the previous patch and post this from scratch.
For now the pass consists of a single phase that assumes
the incoming state from other basic blocks is unknown. A
follow up patch will extend this with a phase to collect
information about how VL/VTYPE change in each block and
a second phase to propagate this information to the entire
function. This will be used by a third phase to do the
vsetvli insertion.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102737
My thought process is that if v2i64 is an LMUL=1 type then v2i32
should be an LMUL=1/2 type. We limit the fractional LMUL so that
SEW=64 clips to LMUL=1, SEW=32 clips to LMUL=1/2, etc. This
ensures there's always a fractional LMUL available to truncate a type.
This does reduce the number of vsetvlis in some cases.
Some tests increase vsetvlis because the best container type for a
mask type is dependent on the LMUL+SEW that the mask was produced
from, but you can't tell that from the type. I think this is
something we need to solve this in the machine IR when optimizing
vsetvlis.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101215
This patch extends VectorLegalizer::ExpandSELECT to permit expansion
also for scalable vector types. The only real change is conditionally
checking for BUILD_VECTOR or SPLAT_VECTOR legality depending on the
vector type.
We can use this to fix "cannot select" errors for scalable vector
selects on the RISCV target. Note that in future patches RISCV will
possibly custom-lower vector SELECTs to VSELECTs for branchless codegen.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102063
Fraser Cormack