This enables proper lowering of non-byte sized loads. We still aren't
faithfully preserving memory types everywhere, so the legality checks
still only consider the size.
This will currently accept the old number of bytes syntax, and convert
it to a scalar. This should be removed in the near future (I think I
converted all of the tests already, but likely missed a few).
Not sure what the exact syntax and policy should be. We can continue
printing the number of bytes for non-generic instructions to avoid
test churn and only allow non-scalar types for generic instructions.
This will currently print the LLT in parentheses, but accept parsing
the existing integers and implicitly converting to scalar. The
parentheses are a bit ugly, but the parser logic seems unable to deal
without either parentheses or some keyword to indicate the start of a
type.
This also adds new interfaces for the fixed- and scalable case:
* LLT::fixed_vector
* LLT::scalable_vector
The strategy for migrating to the new interfaces was as follows:
* If the new LLT is a (modified) clone of another LLT, taking the
same number of elements, then use LLT::vector(OtherTy.getElementCount())
or if the number of elements is halfed/doubled, it uses .divideCoefficientBy(2)
or operator*. That is because there is no reason to specifically restrict
the types to 'fixed_vector'.
* If the algorithm works on the number of elements (as unsigned), then
just use fixed_vector. This will need to be fixed up in the future when
modifying the algorithm to also work for scalable vectors, and will need
then need additional tests to confirm the behaviour works the same for
scalable vectors.
* If the test used the '/*Scalable=*/true` flag of LLT::vector, then
this is replaced by LLT::scalable_vector.
Reviewed By: aemerson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104451
Also, make it structurally required so it can't be forgotten and re-introduce
the bug that led to the rotten green tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99692
:: (store 1 + 4, addrspace 1)
->
:: (store 1 into undef + 4, addrspace 1)
An offset without a base isn't terribly useful but it's convenient to update
the offset without checking the value. For example, when breaking apart
stores into smaller units
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97812
Summary:
This verifier tries to ensure that DebugLoc's don't just disappear as
we transform the MIR. It observes the instructions created, erased, and
changed and at checkpoints chosen by the client algorithm verifies the
locations affected by those changes.
In particular, it verifies that:
* Every DebugLoc for an erased/changing instruction is still present on
at least one new/changed instruction
* Failing that, that there is a line-0 location in the new/changed
instructions. It's not possible to confirm which locations were merged so
it conservatively assumes all unaccounted for locations are accounted
for by any line-0 location to avoid false positives.
If that fails, it prints the lost locations in the debug output along with
the instructions that should have accounted for them.
In theory, this is usable by the legalizer, combiner, selector and any other
pass that performs incremental changes to the MIR. However, it has so far
only really been tested on the legalizer (not including the artifact
combiner) where it has caught lots of lost locations, particularly in Custom
legalizations. There's only one example here as my initial testing was on an
out-of-tree target and I haven't done a pass over the in-tree targets yet.
Depends on D77575, D77446
Reviewers: bogner, aprantl, vsk
Subscribers: jvesely, nhaehnle, mgorny, rovka, hiraditya, volkan, kerbowa, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77576
Previously, getWithOffset() would drop the offset if the base was null.
Because of this, MachineMemOperand would return the wrong result from
getAlign() in these cases. MachineMemOperand stores the alignment of
the pointer without the offset.
A bunch of MIR tests changed because we print the offset now.
Split off from D77687.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78049
Legalization algorithm is complicated by two facts:
1) While regular instructions should be possible to legalize in
an isolated, per-instruction, context-free manner, legalization
artifacts can only be eliminated in pairs, which could be deeply, and
ultimately arbitrary nested: { [ () ] }, where which paranthesis kind
depicts an artifact kind, like extend, unmerge, etc. Such structure
can only be fully eliminated by simple local combines if they are
attempted in a particular order (inside out), or alternatively by
repeated scans each eliminating only one innermost pair, resulting in
O(n^2) complexity.
2) Some artifacts might in fact be regular instructions that could (and
sometimes should) be legalized by the target-specific rules. Which
means failure to eliminate all artifacts on the first iteration is
not a failure, they need to be tried as instructions, which may
produce more artifacts, including the ones that are in fact regular
instructions, resulting in a non-constant number of iterations
required to finish the process.
I trust the recently introduced termination condition (no new artifacts
were created during as-a-regular-instruction-retrial of artifacts not
eliminated on the previous iteration) to be efficient in providing
termination, but only performing the legalization in full if and only if
at each step such chains of artifacts are successfully eliminated in
full as well.
Which is currently not guaranteed, as the artifact combines are applied
only once and in an arbitrary order that has to do with the order of
creation or insertion of artifacts into their worklist, which is a no
particular order.
In this patch I make a small change to the artifact combiner, making it
to re-insert into the worklist immediate (modulo a look-through copies)
artifact users of each vreg that changes its definition due to an
artifact combine.
Here the first scan through the artifacts worklist, while not
being done in any guaranteed order, only needs to find the innermost
pair(s) of artifacts that could be immediately combined out. After that
the process follows def-use chains, making them shorter at each step, thus
combining everything that can be combined in O(n) time.
Reviewers: volkan, aditya_nandakumar, qcolombet, paquette, aemerson, dsanders
Reviewed By: aditya_nandakumar, paquette
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71448
and introducing new unittests/CodeGen/GlobalISel/LegalizerTest.cpp
relying on it to unit test the entire legalizer algorithm (including the
top-level main loop).
See also https://reviews.llvm.org/D71448
Matt Arsenault