In default pipelines the ModuleInlinerWrapperPass is adding the
InlinerPass to the pipeline twice, once due to MandatoryFirst (passing
true in the ctor) and then a second time with false as argument.
To make it possible to bisect and reduce opt test cases for this
part of the pipeline we need to be able to choose between the two
different variants of the InlinerPass when running opt. This patch is
changing 'inline' to a CGSCC_PASS_WITH_PARAMS in the PassRegistry,
making it possible run opt with both -passes=cgscc(inline) and
-passes=cgscc(inline<only-mandatory>).
Reviewed By: aeubanks, mtrofin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109877
Change the asan-module pass into a MODULE_PASS_WITH_PARAMS in the
pass registry, and add a single parameter called 'kernel' that
can be set instead of having a special pass name 'kasan-module'
to trigger that special pass config.
Main reason is to make sure that we have a unique mapping from
ClassName to PassName in the new passmanager framework, making it
possible to correctly identify the passes when dealing with options
such as -print-after and -print-pipeline-passes.
This is a follow-up to D105006 and D105007.
PassBuilder.cpp is the slowest file to compile in LLVM.
When trying to test changes to pipelines, it takes a long time to recompile.
This doesn't actually speedup building PassBuilder.cpp itself since most
of the time is spent in other large/duplicated functions caused by
PassRegistry.def.
Reviewed By: asbirlea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109798
Pseudo probe instrumentation was missing from O0 build. It is needed in cases where some source files are built in O0 while the others are built in optimize mode.
Reviewed By: wenlei, wlei, wmi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109531
Added opt option -print-pipeline-passes to print a -passes compatible
string describing the built pass pipeline.
As an example:
$ opt -enable-new-pm=1 -adce -licm -simplifycfg -o /dev/null /dev/null -print-pipeline-passes
verify,function(adce),function(loop-mssa(licm)),function(simplifycfg<bonus-inst-threshold=1;no-forward-switch-cond;no-switch-to-lookup;keep-loops;no-hoist-common-insts;no-sink-common-insts>),verify,BitcodeWriterPass
At the moment this is best-effort only and there are some known
limitations:
- Not all passes accepting parameters will print their parameters
(currently only implemented for simplifycfg).
- Some ClassName to pass-name mappings are not unique.
- Some ClassName to pass-name mappings are missing (e.g.
BitcodeWriterPass).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108298
Added opt option -print-pipeline-passes to print a -passes compatible
string describing the built pass pipeline.
As an example:
$ opt -enable-new-pm=1 -adce -licm -simplifycfg -o /dev/null /dev/null -print-pipeline-passes
verify,function(adce),function(loop-mssa(licm)),function(simplifycfg<bonus-inst-threshold=1;no-forward-switch-cond;no-switch-to-lookup;keep-loops;no-hoist-common-insts;no-sink-common-insts>),verify,BitcodeWriterPass
At the moment this is best-effort only and there are some known
limitations:
- Not all passes accepting parameters will print their parameters
(currently only implemented for simplifycfg).
- Some ClassName to pass-name mappings are not unique.
- Some ClassName to pass-name mappings are missing (e.g.
BitcodeWriterPass).
A couple of passes that are parameterized in new-PM used different
pass names (in cmd line interface) while using the same pass class
name. This patch updates the PassRegistry to model pass parameters
more properly using PASS_WITH_PARAMS.
Reason for the change is to ensure that we have a 1-1 mapping
between class name and pass name (when disregarding the params).
With a 1-1 mapping it is more obvious which pass name to use in
options such as -debug-only, -print-after etc.
The opt -passes syntax is changed for the following passes:
early-cse-memssa => early-cse<memssa>
post-inline-ee-instrument => ee-instrument<post-inline>
loop-extract-single => loop-extract<single>
lower-matrix-intrinsics-minimal => lower-matrix-intrinsics<minimal>
This patch is not updating pass names in docs/Passes.rst. Not quite
sure what the status is for that document (e.g. when it comes to
listing pass paramters). It is only loop-extract-single that is
mentioned in Passes.rst today, out of the passes mentioned above.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108362
Refactored implementation of AddressSanitizerPass and
HWAddressSanitizerPass to use pass options similar to passes like
MemorySanitizerPass. This makes sure that there is a single mapping
from class name to pass name (needed by D108298), and options like
-debug-only and -print-after makes a bit more sense when (despite
that it is the unparameterized pass name that should be used in those
options).
A result of the above is that some pass names are removed in favor
of the parameterized versions:
- "khwasan" is now "hwasan<kernel;recover>"
- "kasan" is now "asan<kernel>"
- "kmsan" is now "msan<kernel>"
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105007
Currently specifying -licm or -passes=licm will implicitly create
-passes=loop(licm). This does not match the intended default (used
by the legacy PM and by the default pipeline) of using the
MemorySSA-based LICM implementation. As I plan to drop the non-MSSA
implementation, this will stop working entirely...
This special-cases licm to create a loop-mssa manager instead. At
this point it's still possible to use -passes='loop(licm)' to opt
into the AST-based implementation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108155
This option has been enabled by default for quite a while now.
The practical impact of removing the option is that MSSA use
cannot be disabled in default pipelines (both LPM and NPM) and
in manual LPM invocations. NPM can still choose to enable/disable
MSSA using loop vs loop-mssa.
The next step will be to require MSSA for LICM and drop the
AST-based implementation entirely.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108075
Two standalone LoopRotate passes scheduled using
createFunctionToLoopPassAdaptor() currently enable MemorySSA.
However, while LoopRotate can preserve MemorySSA, it does not use
it, so requiring MemorySSA is unnecessary.
This change doesn't have a practical compile-time impact by itself,
because subsequent passes still request MemorySSA.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108073
Pulled out the OptimizationLevel class from PassBuilder in order to be able to access it from within the PassManager and avoid include conflicts.
Reviewed By: mtrofin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107025
The current JumpThreading pass does not jump thread loops since it can
result in irreducible control flow that harms other optimizations. This
prevents switch statements inside a loop from being optimized to use
unconditional branches.
This code pattern occurs in the core_state_transition function of
Coremark. The state machine can be implemented manually with goto
statements resulting in a large runtime improvement, and this transform
makes the switch implementation match the goto version in performance.
This patch specifically targets switch statements inside a loop that
have the opportunity to be threaded. Once it identifies an opportunity,
it creates new paths that branch directly to the correct code block.
For example, the left CFG could be transformed to the right CFG:
```
sw.bb sw.bb
/ | \ / | \
case1 case2 case3 case1 case2 case3
\ | / / | \
latch.bb latch.2 latch.3 latch.1
br sw.bb / | \
sw.bb.2 sw.bb.3 sw.bb.1
br case2 br case3 br case1
```
Co-author: Justin Kreiner @jkreiner
Co-author: Ehsan Amiri @amehsan
Reviewed By: SjoerdMeijer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99205
This patch make coroutine passes run by default in LLVM pipeline. Now
the clang and opt could handle IR inputs containing coroutine intrinsics
without special options.
It should be fine. On the one hand, the coroutine passes seems to be stable
since there are already many projects using coroutine feature.
On the other hand, the coroutine passes should do nothing for IR who doesn't
contain coroutine intrinsic.
Test Plan: check-llvm
Reviewed by: lxfind, aeubanks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105877
To help with debugging non-trivial unswitching issues.
Don't care about the legacy pass, nobody is using it.
If a pass's string params are empty (e.g. "simple-loop-unswitch"), don't
default to the empty constructor for the pass params. We should still
let the parser take care of it in case the parser has its own defaults.
Reviewed By: asbirlea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105933
There was an alias between 'simplifycfg' and 'simplify-cfg' in the
PassRegistry. That was the original reason for this patch, which
effectively removes the alias.
This patch also replaces all occurrances of 'simplify-cfg'
by 'simplifycfg'. Reason for choosing that form for the name is
that it matches the DEBUG_TYPE for the pass, and the legacy PM name
and also how it is spelled out in other passes such as
'loop-simplifycfg', and in other options such as
'simplifycfg-merge-cond-stores'.
I for some reason the name should be changed to 'simplify-cfg' in
the future, then I think such a renaming should be more widely done
and not only impacting the PassRegistry.
Reviewed By: aeubanks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105627
To support options like -print-before=<pass> and -print-after=<pass>
the PassBuilder will register PassInstrumentation callbacks as well
as a mapping between internal pass class names and the pass names
used in those options (and other cmd line interfaces). But for
some reason all the passes that takes options where missing in those
maps, so for example "-print-after=loop-vectorize" didn't work.
This patch will add the missing entries by also taking care of
function and loop passes with params when setting up the class to
pass name maps.
One might notice that even with this patch it might be tricky to
know what pass name to use in options such as -print-after. This
because there only is a single mapping from class name to pass name,
while the PassRegistry currently is a bit messy as it sometimes
reuses the same class for different pass names (without using the
"pass with params" scheme, or the pass-name<variant> syntax).
It gets extra messy in some situations. For example the
MemorySanitizerPass can run like this (with debug and print-after)
opt -passes='kmsan' -print-after=msan-module -debug-only=msan
The 'kmsan' alias for 'msan<kernel>' is just confusing as one might
think that 'kmsan' is a separate pass (but the DEBUG_TYPE is still
just 'msan'). And since the module pass version of the pass adds
a mapping from 'MemorySanitizerPass' to 'msan-module' one need to
use 'msan-module' in the print-before and print-after options.
Reviewed By: ychen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105006
AddDiscriminatorsPass is in Legacy PM's O0 pipeline. This patch did the same
for NPM O0 pipeline.
Reviewed By: aeubanks, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105650
Relevant discussion can be found at: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2021-January/148197.html
In the existing design, An SCC that contains a coroutine will go through the folloing passes:
Inliner -> CoroSplitPass (fake) -> FunctionSimplificationPipeline -> Inliner -> CoroSplitPass (real) -> FunctionSimplificationPipeline
The first CoroSplitPass doesn't do anything other than putting the SCC back to the queue so that the entire pipeline can repeat.
As you can see, we run Inliner twice on the SCC consecutively without doing any real split, which is unnecessary and likely unintended.
What we really wanted is this:
Inliner -> FunctionSimplificationPipeline -> CoroSplitPass -> FunctionSimplificationPipeline
(note that we don't really need to run Inliner again on the ramp function after split).
Hence the way we do it here is to move CoroSplitPass to the end of the CGSCC pipeline, make it once for real, insert the newly generated SCCs (the clones) back to the pipeline so that they can be optimized, and also add a function simplification pipeline after CoroSplit to optimize the post-split ramp function.
This approach also conforms to how the new pass manager works instead of relying on an adhoc post split cleanup, making it ready for full switch to new pass manager eventually.
By looking at some of the changes to the tests, we can already observe that this changes allows for more optimizations applied to coroutines.
Reviewed By: aeubanks, ChuanqiXu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95807
CoroElide pass works only when a post-split coroutine is inlined into another post-split coroutine.
In O0, there is no inlining after CoroSplit, and hence no CoroElide can happen.
It's useless to put CoroElide pass in the O0 pipeline and it will never be triggered (unless I miss anything).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105066
Now that the OpenMPOpt module pass include important optimizations for removing
globalization from offloading regions it should be run at a lower optimization
level.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105056
Addition of this pass has been botched.
There is no particular reason why it had to be sold as an inseparable part
of new-pm transition. It was added when old-pm was still the default,
and very *very* few users were actually tracking new-pm,
so it's effects weren't measured.
Which means, some of the turnoil of the new-pm transition
are actually likely regressions due to this pass.
Likewise, there has been a number of post-commit feedback
(post new-pm switch), namely
* https://reviews.llvm.org/D37467#2787157 (regresses HW-loops)
* https://reviews.llvm.org/D37467#2787259 (should not be in middle-end, should run after LSR, not before)
* https://reviews.llvm.org/D95789 (an attempt to fix bad loop backedge metadata)
and in the half year past, the pass authors (google) still haven't found time to respond to any of that.
Hereby it is proposed to backout the pass from the pipeline,
until someone who cares about it can address the issues reported,
and properly start the process of adding a new pass into the pipeline,
with proper performance evaluation.
Furthermore, neither google nor facebook reports any perf changes
from this change, so i'm dropping the pass completely.
It can always be re-reverted should/if anyone want to pick it up again.
Reviewed By: aeubanks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104099
This adds a function specialization pass to LLVM. Constant parameters
like function pointers and constant globals are propagated to the callee by
specializing the function.
This is a first version with a number of limitations:
- The pass is off by default, so needs to be enabled on the command line,
- It does not handle specialization of recursive functions,
- It does not yet handle constants and constant ranges,
- Only 1 argument per function is specialised,
- The cost-model could be further looked into, and perhaps related,
- We are not yet caching analysis results.
This is based on earlier work by Matthew Simpson (D36432) and Vinay Madhusudan.
More recently this was also discussed on the list, see:
https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2021-March/149380.html.
The motivation for this work is that function specialisation often comes up as
a reason for performance differences of generated code between LLVM and GCC,
which has this enabled by default from optimisation level -O3 and up. And while
this certainly helps a few cpu benchmark cases, this also triggers in real
world codes and is thus a generally useful transformation to have in LLVM.
Function specialisation has great potential to increase compile-times and
code-size. The summary from some investigations with this patch is:
- Compile-time increases for short compile jobs is high relatively, but the
increase in absolute numbers still low.
- For longer compile-jobs, the extra compile time is around 1%, and very much
in line with GCC.
- It is difficult to blame one thing for compile-time increases: it looks like
everywhere a little bit more time is spent processing more functions and
instructions.
- But the function specialisation pass itself is not very expensive; it doesn't
show up very high in the profile of the optimisation passes.
The goal of this work is to reach parity with GCC which means that eventually
we would like to get this enabled by default. But first we would like to address
some of the limitations before that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93838
This patch changes LoopUnrollAndJamPass from FunctionPass to LoopNest pass.
The next patch will utilize LoopNest to effectively handle loop nests.
Also, a crash problem on legacy pass manager is fixed.
Reviewed By: Whitney
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99149
This pass transforms loops that contain a conditional branch with induction
variable. For example, it transforms left code to right code:
newbound = min(n, c)
while (iv < n) { while(iv < newbound) {
A A
if (iv < c) B
B C
C }
} if (iv != n) {
while (iv < n) {
A
C
}
}
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102234
This is split off from D102002, and I think it is clear that
the difference in behavior was not intended. Options were
added to SimplifyCFG over time, but different chunks of
the pass pipelines were not kept in sync.
This patch changes LoopFlattenPass from FunctionPass to LoopNestPass.
Utilize LoopNest and let function 'Flatten' generate information from it.
Reviewed By: Whitney
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102904
This patch changes LoopFlattenPass from FunctionPass to LoopNestPass.
Utilize LoopNest and let function 'Flatten' generate information from it.
Reviewed By: Whitney
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102904
This patch changes LoopFlattenPass from FunctionPass to LoopNestPass.
Utilize LoopNest and let function 'Flatten' generate information from it.
Reviewed By: Whitney
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102904
This patch changes LoopUnrollAndJamPass from FunctionPass to LoopNest pass.
The next patch will utilize LoopNest to effectively handle loop nests.
Reviewed By: Whitney
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99149
This patch changes LoopUnrollAndJamPass from FunctionPass to LoopNest pass.
The next patch will utilize LoopNest to effectively handle loop nests.
Reviewed By: Whitney
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99149
This patch changes LoopUnrollAndJamPass from FunctionPass to LoopNest pass.
The next patch will utilize LoopNest to effectively handle loop nests.
Reviewed By: Whitney
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99149
This patch adjusts the LTO pipeline in the new PM to run GlobalsAA
before LICM to match the legacy PM.
This fixes a regression where the new PM failed to vectorize loops that
require hoisting/sinking by LICM depending on GlobalsAA info.
Reviewed By: aeubanks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102345
Split off from D102345 to commit this separately from other changes in
the patch. This aligns the behavior of the new PM with the legacy PM
for LTO, with respect to running LICM.
Together with the remaining changes in D102345, this fixes new PM
regressions where we fail to vectorize loops that are vectorized with
the legacy PM.
This is better no-functional-change-intended than the 1st attempt.
As noted in D102002, there were at least 2 diffs that went
unchecked in pass manager regressions tests: different pass
parameters (SimplifyCFG) and an extension point/callback.
Those should be lifted from the original code blocks correctly
now.
This reverts commit fefcb1f878.
It was supposed to be NFC, but as noted in the post-commit
comments in D102002, that was not true: SimplifyCFG uses
different parameters and there's a difference in an
extension point / callback.
Printing pass manager invocations is fairly verbose and not super
useful.
This allows us to remove DebugLogging from pass managers and PassBuilder
since all logging (aside from analysis managers) goes through
instrumentation now.
This has the downside of never being able to print the top level pass
manager via instrumentation, but that seems like a minor downside.
Reviewed By: ychen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101797
The CGSCC pass manager interplay with the FunctionAnalysisManagerCGSCCProxy is 'special' in the sense that the former will rerun the latter if there are changes to a SCC structure; that being said, some of the functions in the SCC may be unchanged. In that case, the function simplification pipeline will be re-run, which impacts compile time[1].
This patch allows the function simplification pipeline be skipped if it was already run and the function was not modified since.
The behavior is currently disabled by default. This is because, currently, the rerunning of the function simplification pipeline on an unchanged function may still result in changes. The patch simplifies investigating and fixing those cases where repeated function pass runs do actually positively impact code quality, while offering an easy workaround for those impacted negatively by compile time regressions, and not impacting mainline scenarios.
[1] A [[ http://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=eb37d3546cd0c6e67798496634c45e501f7806f1&to=ac722d1190dc7bbdd17e977ef7ec95e69eefc91e&stat=instructions | compile time tracker ]] run with the option enabled.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98103
GlobalsAA is only created at the beginning of the inliner pipeline. If
an AAManager is cached from previous passes, it won't get rebuilt to
include the newly created GlobalsAA.
Reviewed By: mtrofin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101379
Relative look table converter pass caused an issue when full lto
is enabled (reported in https://reviews.llvm.org/D94355).
This patch disables that pass from full lto pre-link phase optimization
pipeline until the issue is fixed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101664
Hoisting and sinking instructions out of conditional blocks enables
additional vectorization by:
1. Executing memory accesses unconditionally.
2. Reducing the number of instructions that need predication.
After disabling early hoisting / sinking, we miss out on a few
vectorization opportunities. One of those is causing a ~10% performance
regression in one of the Geekbench benchmarks on AArch64.
This patch tires to recover the regression by running hoisting/sinking
as part of a SimplifyCFG run after LoopRotate and before LoopVectorize.
Note that in the legacy pass-manager, we run LoopRotate just before
vectorization again and there's no SimplifyCFG run in between, so the
sinking/hoisting may impact the later run on LoopRotate. But the impact
should be limited and the benefit of hosting/sinking at this stage
should outweigh the risk of not rotating.
Compile-time impact looks slightly positive for most cases.
http://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=2ea7fb7b1c045a7d60fcccf3df3ebb26aa3699e5&to=e58b4a763c691da651f25996aad619cb3d946faf&stat=instructions
NewPM-O3: geomean -0.19%
NewPM-ReleaseThinLTO: geoman -0.54%
NewPM-ReleaseLTO-g: geomean -0.03%
With a few benchmarks seeing a notable increase, but also some
improvements.
Alternative to D101290.
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101468
Summary:
This patch registers OpenMPOpt as a Module pass in addition to a CGSCC
pass. This is so certain optimzations that are sensitive to intact
call-sites can happen before inlining. The old `openmpopt` pass name is
changed to `openmp-opt-cgscc` and `openmp-opt` calls the Module pass.
The current module pass only runs a single check but will be expanded in
the future.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99202
Lookup tables generate non PIC-friendly code, which requires dynamic relocation as described in:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45244
This patch adds a new pass that converts lookup tables to relative lookup tables to make them PIC-friendly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94355
Retry of 330619a3a6 that includes a clang test update.
Original commit message:
If we run passes before lowering llvm.expect intrinsics to metadata,
then those passes have no way to act on the hints provided by llvm.expect.
SimplifyCFG is the known offender, and we made it smarter about profile
metadata in D98898 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D98898>.
In the motivating example from https://llvm.org/PR49336 , this means we
were ignoring the recommended method for a programmer to tell the compiler
that a compare+branch is expensive. This change appears to solve that case -
the metadata survives to the backend, the compare order is as expected in IR,
and the backend does not do anything to reverse it.
We make the same change to the old pass manager to keep things synchronized.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100213
If we run passes before lowering llvm.expect intrinsics to metadata,
then those passes have no way to act on the hints provided by llvm.expect.
SimplifyCFG is the known offender, and we made it smarter about profile
metadata in D98898.
In the motivating example from https://llvm.org/PR49336 , this means we
were ignoring the recommended method for a programmer to tell the compiler
that a compare+branch is expensive. This change appears to solve that case -
the metadata survives to the backend, the compare order is as expected in IR,
and the backend does not do anything to reverse it.
We make the same change to the old pass manager to keep things synchronized.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100213
Lookup tables generate non PIC-friendly code, which requires dynamic relocation as described in:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45244
This patch adds a new pass that converts lookup tables to relative lookup tables to make them PIC-friendly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94355
Lookup tables generate non PIC-friendly code, which requires dynamic relocation as described in:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45244
This patch adds a new pass that converts lookup tables to relative lookup tables to make them PIC-friendly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94355
Summary:
The IR is saved in its print form before each pass is started and a
signal handler is registered. If the compilation crashes, the signal
handler will print the saved IR to dbgs(). This option
can be modified using -print-module-scope to get the IR for the complete
module. Note that this option only works with the new pass manager.
Author: Jamie Schmeiser <schmeise@ca.ibm.com>
Reviewed By: aeubanks (Arthur Eubanks) yrouban (Yevgeny Rouban)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86657
Lookup tables generate non PIC-friendly code, which requires dynamic relocation as described in:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45244
This patch adds a new pass that converts lookup tables to relative lookup tables to make them PIC-friendly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94355
D96109 was recently submitted which contains the refactored implementation of
-funique-internal-linakge-names by adding the unique suffixes in clang rather
than as an LLVM pass. Deleting the former implementation in this change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98234
We have the `enable-loopinterchange` option in legacy pass manager but not in NPM.
Add `LoopInterchange` pass to the optimization pipeline (at the same position as before)
when `enable-loopinterchange` is turned on.
Reviewed By: aeubanks, fhahn
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98116
We're running into undefined references using ThinLTO with -O0 on
Windows/Chrome. This fixes that.
This matches the legacy PM.
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97414
-O1 and above do dont call real optimizer pipeline in ThinLTO PreLink.
Also clang can't add PostLink OptimizerLastEPCallbacks for in-process ThinLTO.
This results in missing sanitizer passes with ThinLTO.
Simple working solution is just call OptimizerLastEPCallbacks
at the end of buildThinLTOPreLinkDefaultPipeline.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96320
For ThinLTO, PreLink ICP is skipped to favor better profile annotation during LTO PostLink. This change applies the same tweak for MonoLTO. Note that PreLink ICP not only makes PostLink profile annotation harder, it is also uncoordinated with PostLink ICP so duplicated ICP could happen.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97028
This enables use of MemorySSA instead of MemDep in MemCpyOpt. To
allow this without significant compile-time impact, the MemCpyOpt
pass is moved directly before DSE (in the cases where this was not
already the case), which allows us to reuse the existing MemorySSA
analysis.
Unlike the MemDep-based implementation, the MemorySSA-based MemCpyOpt
can also perform simple optimizations across basic blocks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94376
The NPM LTO pipeline has a lot of fixme's and missing passes, causing a
lot of regressions after the switch in c70737b. Notably unrolling and
vectorization were both disabled, but many other passes are missing
compared to the old pass manager. This attempt to enable the most
obvious missing passes like the unroller, vectorization and other loop
passes, fixing the existing FIXME comments.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96780
The PrepareForLTO stage of LoopRotate tries to avoid unrolling loops
with calls that might be inlined later. See D94232 where this was
introduced.
We didn't catch all occurances of the LoopRotatePass in the New Pass
Manager, so the original regression in astar returned with the pass
manager switch.
The GPUDivergenceAnalysis is now renamed to just "DivergenceAnalysis"
since there is no conflict with LegacyDivergenceAnalysis. In the
legacy PM, this analysis can only be used through the legacy DA
serving as a wrapper. It is now made available as a pass in the new
PM, and has no relation with the legacy DA.
The new DA currently cannot handle irreducible control flow; its
presence can cause the analysis to run indefinitely. The analysis is
now modified to detect this and report all instructions in the
function as divergent. This is super conservative, but allows the
analysis to be used without hanging the compiler.
Reviewed By: aeubanks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96615
It seems nicer to list passes given a flag rather than displaying all
passes in opt --help.
This is awkwardly structured because a PassBuilder is required, but
reusing the PassBuilder in runPassPipeline() doesn't work because we
read the input IR before getting to runPassPipeline(). So printing the
list of passes needs to happen before reading the input IR. If we remove
the legacy PM code in main() and move everything from NewPMDriver.cpp
into opt.cpp, we can create the PassBuilder before reading IR and check
if we should print the list of passes and exit. But until then this hack
seems fine.
Compared to the legacy PM, the new PM passes are lacking descriptions.
We'll need to figure out a way to add descriptions if we think this is
important.
Also, this only works for passes specified in PassRegistry.def. If we
want to print other custom registered passes, we'll need a different
mechanism.
Reviewed By: asbirlea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96101
Sample re-annotation is required in LTO time to achieve a reasonable post-inline profile quality. However, we have seen that such LTO-time re-annotation degrades profile quality. This is mainly caused by preLTO code duplication that is done by passes such as loop unrolling, jump threading, indirect call promotion etc, where samples corresponding to a source location are aggregated multiple times due to the duplicates. In this change we are introducing a concept of distribution factor for pseudo probes so that samples can be distributed for duplicated probes scaled by a factor. We hope that optimizations duplicating code well-maintain the branch frequency information (BFI) based on which probe distribution factors are calculated. Distribution factors are updated at the end of preLTO pipeline to reflect an estimated portion of the real execution count.
This change also introduces a pseudo probe verifier that can be run after each IR passes to detect duplicated pseudo probes.
A saturated distribution factor stands for 1.0. A pesudo probe will carry a factor with the value ranged from 0.0 to 1.0. A 64-bit integral distribution factor field that represents [0.0, 1.0] is associated to each block probe. Unfortunately this cannot be done for callsite probes due to the size limitation of a 32-bit Dwarf discriminator. A 7-bit distribution factor is used instead.
Changes are also needed to the sample profile inliner to deal with prorated callsite counts. Call sites duplicated by PreLTO passes, when later on inlined in LTO time, should have the callees’s probe prorated based on the Prelink-computed distribution factors. The distribution factors should also be taken into account when computing hotness for inline candidates. Also, Indirect call promotion results in multiple callisites. The original samples should be distributed across them. This is fixed by adjusting the callisites' distribution factors.
Reviewed By: wmi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93264
Some benchmarks regress with non-trivial unswitching, so add an option
to opt-out of performing non-trivial unswitching while investigating.
Reviewed By: asbirlea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95796
As it looks like NewPM generally is using SimpleLoopUnswitch
instead of LoopUnswitch, this patch also use SimpleLoopUnswitch
in the ExtraVectorizerPasses sequence (compared with LegacyPM
which use the LoopUnswitch pass).
Reviewed By: aeubanks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95457
D84108 exposed a bad interaction between inlining and loop-rotation
during regular LTO, which is causing notable regressions in at least
CINT2006/473.astar.
The problem boils down to: we now rotate a loop just before the vectorizer
which requires duplicating a function call in the preheader when compiling
the individual files ('prepare for LTO'). But this then prevents further
inlining of the function during LTO.
This patch tries to resolve this issue by making LoopRotate more
conservative with respect to rotating loops that have inline-able calls
during the 'prepare for LTO' stage.
I think this change intuitively improves the current situation in
general. Loop-rotate tries hard to avoid creating headers that are 'too
big'. At the moment, it assumes all inlining already happened and the
cost of duplicating a call is equal to just doing the call. But with LTO,
inlining also happens during full LTO and it is possible that a previously
duplicated call is actually a huge function which gets inlined
during LTO.
From the perspective of LV, not much should change overall. Most loops
calling user-provided functions won't get vectorized to start with
(unless we can infer that the function does not touch memory, has no
other side effects). If we do not inline the 'inline-able' call during
the LTO stage, we merely delayed loop-rotation & vectorization. If we
inline during LTO, chances should be very high that the inlined code is
itself vectorizable or the user call was not vectorizable to start with.
There could of course be scenarios where we inline a sufficiently large
function with code not profitable to vectorize, which would have be
vectorized earlier (by scalarzing the call). But even in that case,
there probably is no big performance impact, because it should be mostly
down to the cost-model to reject vectorization in that case. And then
the version with scalarized calls should also not be beneficial. In a way,
LV should have strictly more information after inlining and make more
accurate decisions (barring cost-model issues).
There is of course plenty of room for things to go wrong unexpectedly,
so we need to keep a close look at actual performance and address any
follow-up issues.
I took a look at the impact on statistics for
MultiSource/SPEC2000/SPEC2006. There are a few benchmarks with fewer
loops rotated, but no change to the number of loops vectorized.
Reviewed By: sanwou01
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94232
Expanding from D94808 - we ensure the same InlineAdvisor is used by both
InlinerPass instances. The notion of mandatory inlining is moved into
the core InlineAdvisor: advisors anyway have to handle that case, so
this change also factors out that a bit better.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94825
https://reviews.llvm.org/D90402 was inconsistent with where it put
LoopFlatten between the two pass managers. It also missed adding it to
the non-O1 function simplification pipeline.
PR48738
Reviewed By: SjoerdMeijer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94650
to Pass.h.
In some compiler passes like SampleProfileLoaderPass, we want to know which
LTO/ThinLTO phase the pass is in. Currently the phase is represented in enum
class PassBuilder::ThinLTOPhase, so it is only available in PassBuilder and
it also cannot represent phase in full LTO. The patch extends it to include
full LTO phases and move it from PassBuilder.h to Pass.h, then it is much
easier for PassBuilder to communiate with each pass about current LTO phase.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94613
This currently blocks --print-before/after with a legacy PM pass, for
example when we use the new PM for the optimization pipeline but the
legacy PM for the codegen pipeline. Also in the future when the codegen
pipeline works with the new PM there will be multiple places to specify
passes, so even when everything is using the new PM, there will still be
multiple places that can accept different pass names.
Reviewed By: hoy, ychen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94283
bb7d3af113 disabled hoisting in SimplifyCFG by default, but enabled it
late in the pipeline. But it appears as if the LTO pipelines got missed.
This patch adjusts the LTO pipelines to also enable hoisting in the
later stages.
Unfortunately there's no easy way to add a test for the change I think.
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93684
`UniqueInternalLinkageNamesPass` is useful to CSSPGO, especially when pseudo probe is used. It solves naming conflict for static functions which otherwise will share a merged profile and likely have a profile quality issue with mismatched CFG checksums. Since the pseudo probe instrumentation happens very early in the pipeline, I'm moving `UniqueInternalLinkageNamesPass` right before it. This is being done only to the new pass manager.
Reviewed By: dblaikie, aeubanks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93656
CGSCCOptimizerLateEPCallbacks are supposed to be run before the function
simplification pipeline, like in the legacy PM and as specified in the
comments for registerCGSCCOptimizerLateEPCallback().
Reviewed By: ychen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93871
AMDGPUTargetMachine::adjustPassManager() adds some alias analyses to the
legacy PM. We need a way to do the same for the new PM in order to port
AMDGPUTargetMachine::adjustPassManager() to the new PM.
Currently the new PM adds alias analyses by creating an AAManager via
PassBuilder and overriding the AAManager a PassManager uses via
FunctionAnalysisManager::registerPass().
We will continue to respect a custom AA pipeline that specifies an exact
AA pipeline to use, but for "default" we will now add alias analyses
that backends specify. Most uses of PassManager use the "default"
AAManager created by PassBuilder::buildDefaultAAPipeline(). Backends can
override the newly added TargetMachine::registerAliasAnalyses() to add custom
alias analyses.
Reviewed By: ychen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93261
Extracting the similar regions is the first step in the IROutliner.
Using the IRSimilarityIdentifier, we collect the SimilarityGroups and
sort them by how many instructions will be removed. Each
IRSimilarityCandidate is used to define an OutlinableRegion. Each
region is ordered by their occurrence in the Module and the regions that
are not compatible with previously outlined regions are discarded.
Each region is then extracted with the CodeExtractor into its own
function.
We test that correctly extract in:
test/Transforms/IROutliner/extraction.ll
test/Transforms/IROutliner/address-taken.ll
test/Transforms/IROutliner/outlining-same-globals.ll
test/Transforms/IROutliner/outlining-same-constants.ll
test/Transforms/IROutliner/outlining-different-structure.ll
Recommit of bf899e8913 fixing memory
leaks.
Reviewers: paquette, jroelofs, yroux
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86975
Bjorn Pettersson