f2a39a7b4e
Revert r234786, it contained a bunch of stuff I did not mean to commit.
...
llvm-svn: 234787
2015-04-13 20:03:03 +00:00
b31abb05fb
Revert r234613 (and follow-ups 234614, 234616, 234618), it caused PR23216.
...
llvm-svn: 234786
2015-04-13 20:01:20 +00:00
bf91164f1c
Fix "warning: fallthrough annotation does not directly precede switch label" in lambdas.
...
Summary: This patch fixes http://llvm.org/PR17864 - "warning: fallthrough annotation does not directly precede switch label" in lambdas.
Reviewers: rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: rnk, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4258
llvm-svn: 211599
2014-06-24 15:28:21 +00:00
cdf1108b61
As of r202325, CFGBlock predecessors may be NULL. Ignore such preds. Fixes a crasher, PR18983.
...
llvm-svn: 202340
2014-02-27 02:43:25 +00:00
1e05e86de5
Moved fallthrough regression test to switch-implicit-fallthrough.cpp.
...
llvm-svn: 178554
2013-04-02 17:55:01 +00:00
c121b9b796
-Wimplicit-fallthrough: fixed two cases where "fallthrough annotation in unreachable code" was issued incorrectly.
...
Summary:
-Wimplicit-fallthrough: fixed two cases where "fallthrough annotation in unreachable code" was issued incorrectly:
1. In actual unreachable code, but not immediately on a fall-through execution
path "fallthrough annotation does not directly precede switch label" is better;
2. After default: in a switch with covered enum cases. Actually, these shouldn't
be treated as unreachable code for our purpose.
Reviewers: rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D374
llvm-svn: 174575
2013-02-07 02:17:19 +00:00
527fa4f24f
Fixed segmentation fault when a CFGBlock has NULL successor.
...
llvm-svn: 174182
2013-02-01 15:39:20 +00:00
afed1ddb40
Don't warn on fall-through from unreachable code.
...
Summary:
A motivating example:
class ClassWithDtor {
public:
~ClassWithDtor() {}
};
void fallthrough3(int n) {
switch (n) {
case 2:
do {
ClassWithDtor temp;
return;
} while (0); // This generates a chain of unreachable CFG blocks.
case 3:
break;
}
}
Reviewers: rsmith, doug.gregor, alexfh
Reviewed By: alexfh
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D330
llvm-svn: 173889
2013-01-30 03:49:44 +00:00
09f15f3edf
Silence unintended fallthrough diagnostic on a case label preceded with a normal label.
...
Summary:
It's unlikely that a fallthrough is unintended in the following code:
switch (n) {
...
label:
case 1:
...
goto label;
...
}
Reviewers: rsmith, doug.gregor
Reviewed By: doug.gregor
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D329
llvm-svn: 173486
2013-01-25 20:44:56 +00:00
5548879324
Don't suggest to insert [[clang::fallthrough]] before empty cases. Fix for multiple case labels.
...
llvm-svn: 173458
2013-01-25 15:49:34 +00:00
9a34889efe
Added test with sizeof conditions (relies on to-be-implemented functionality of CFG, discussion: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20120507/057370.html )
...
llvm-svn: 158854
2012-06-20 21:12:23 +00:00
246e85ddb0
Don't offer '[[clang::fallthrough]];' fix-it when a fall-through occurs to a
...
switch label immediately followed by a 'break;'.
llvm-svn: 157508
2012-05-26 00:49:15 +00:00
84837d5b5a
Add -Wimplicit-fallthrough warning flag, which warns on fallthrough between
...
cases in switch statements. Also add a [[clang::fallthrough]] attribute, which
can be used to suppress the warning in the case of intentional fallthrough.
Patch by Alexander Kornienko!
The handling of C++11 attribute namespaces in this patch is temporary, and will
be replaced with a cleaner mechanism in a subsequent patch.
llvm-svn: 156086
2012-05-03 18:27:39 +00:00
Nico Weber