See https://reviews.llvm.org/D74651 for the preallocated IR constructs
and LangRef changes.
In X86TargetLowering::LowerCall(), if a call is preallocated, record
each argument's offset from the stack pointer and the total stack
adjustment. Associate the call Value with an integer index. Store the
info in X86MachineFunctionInfo with the integer index as the key.
This adds two new target independent ISDOpcodes and two new target
dependent Opcodes corresponding to @llvm.call.preallocated.{setup,arg}.
The setup ISelDAG node takes in a chain and outputs a chain and a
SrcValue of the preallocated call Value. It is lowered to a target
dependent node with the SrcValue replaced with the integer index key by
looking in X86MachineFunctionInfo. In
X86TargetLowering::EmitInstrWithCustomInserter() this is lowered to an
%esp adjustment, the exact amount determined by looking in
X86MachineFunctionInfo with the integer index key.
The arg ISelDAG node takes in a chain, a SrcValue of the preallocated
call Value, and the arg index int constant. It produces a chain and the
pointer fo the arg. It is lowered to a target dependent node with the
SrcValue replaced with the integer index key by looking in
X86MachineFunctionInfo. In
X86TargetLowering::EmitInstrWithCustomInserter() this is lowered to a
lea of the stack pointer plus an offset determined by looking in
X86MachineFunctionInfo with the integer index key.
Force any function containing a preallocated call to use the frame
pointer.
Does not yet handle a setup without a call, or a conditional call.
Does not yet handle musttail. That requires a LangRef change first.
Tried to look at all references to inalloca and see if they apply to
preallocated. I've made preallocated versions of tests testing inalloca
whenever possible and when they make sense (e.g. not alloca related,
inalloca edge cases).
Aside from the tests added here, I checked that this codegen produces
correct code for something like
```
struct A {
A();
A(A&&);
~A();
};
void bar() {
foo(foo(foo(foo(foo(A(), 4), 5), 6), 7), 8);
}
```
by replacing the inalloca version of the .ll file with the appropriate
preallocated code. Running the executable produces the same results as
using the current inalloca implementation.
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77689
Now that load/store alignment is required, we no longer need most
of them. Also switch the getLoadStoreAlignment() helper to return
Align instead of MaybeAlign.
Along the lines of D77454 and D79968. Unlike loads and stores, the
default alignment is getPrefTypeAlign, to match the existing handling in
various places, including SelectionDAG and InstCombine.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80044
This is D77454, except for stores. All the infrastructure work was done
for loads, so the remaining changes necessary are relatively small.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79968
The fact that loads and stores can have the alignment missing is a
constant source of confusion: code that usually works can break down in
rare cases. So fix the LoadInst API so the alignment is never missing.
To reduce the number of changes required to make this work, IRBuilder
and certain LoadInst constructors will grab the module's datalayout and
compute the alignment automatically. This is the same alignment
instcombine would eventually apply anyway; we're just doing it earlier.
There's a minor risk that the way we're retrieving the datalayout
could break out-of-tree code, but I don't think that's likely.
This is the last in a series of patches, so most of the necessary
changes have already been merged.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77454
Summary:
This patch handles illegal scalable types when lowering IR operations,
addressing several places where the value of isScalableVector() is
ignored.
For types such as <vscale x 8 x i32>, this means splitting the
operations. In this example, we would split it into two
operations of type <vscale x 4 x i32> for the low and high halves.
In cases such as <vscale x 2 x i32>, the elements in the vector
will be promoted. In this case they will be promoted to
i64 (with a vector of type <vscale x 2 x i64>)
Reviewers: sdesmalen, efriedma, huntergr
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: david-arm, tschuett, hiraditya, rkruppe, psnobl, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78812
We allocated a suitably aligned frame index so we know that all the values
have ABI alignment.
For MIPS this avoids using pair of lwl + lwr instructions instead of a
single lw. I found this when compiling CHERI pure capability code where
we can't use the lwl/lwr unaligned loads/stores and and were to falling
back to a byte load + shift + or sequence.
This should save a few instructions for MIPS and possibly other backends
that don't have fast unaligned loads/stores.
It also improves code generation for CodeGen/X86/pr34653.ll and
CodeGen/WebAssembly/offset.ll since they can now use aligned loads.
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78999
This method has been commented as deprecated for a while. Remove
it and replace all uses with the equivalent getCalledOperand().
I also made a few cleanups in here. For example, to removes use
of getElementType on a pointer when we could just use getFunctionType
from the call.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78882
Summary:
When generating code for the LLVM IR zeroinitialiser operation, if
the vector type is scalable we should be using SPLAT_VECTOR instead
of BUILD_VECTOR.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78636
Using getValueType() is not correct for architectures extended with CHERI since
we need a pointer type and not the value that is loaded. While stack
protector is useless when you have CHERI (since CHERI provides much
stronger security guarantees), we still have a test to check that we can
generate correct code for checks. Merging b281138a1b
into our tree broke this test. Fix by using TLI.getFrameIndexTy().
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77785
Summary:
Remove asserting vector getters from Type in preparation for the
VectorType refactor. The existence of these functions complicates the
refactor while adding little value.
Reviewers: dexonsmith, sdesmalen, efriedma
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: cfe-commits, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77278
I've always found the "findValue" a little odd and
inconsistent with other things in SDB.
This simplfifies the code in SDB to just handle a splat constant
address or a 2 operand GEP in the same BB. This removes the
need for "findValue" since the operands to the GEP are
guaranteed to be available. The splat constant handling is
new, but was needed to avoid regressions due to constant
folding combining GEPs created in CGP.
CGP is now responsible for canonicalizing gather/scatters into
this form. The pattern I'm using for scalarizing, a scalar GEP
followed by a GEP with an all zeroes index, seems to be subject
to constant folding that the insertelement+shufflevector was not.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76947
The "Align" passed into getMachineMemOperand etc. is the alignment of
the MachinePointerInfo, not the alignment of the memory operation.
(getAlign() on a MachineMemOperand automatically reduces the alignment
to account for this.)
We were passing on wrong (overconservative) alignment in a bunch of
places. Fix a bunch of these, mostly in legalization. And while I'm
here, switch to the new Align APIs.
The test changes are all scheduling changes: the biggest effect of
preserving large alignments is that it improves alias analysis, so the
scheduler has more freedom.
(I was originally just trying to do a minor cleanup in
SelectionDAGBuilder, but I accidentally went deeper down the rabbit
hole.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77687
Summary:
No error or warning is emitted when specific reserved registers are
written to in inline assembly. Therefore, writes to the program counter
or to the frame pointer, for instance, were permitted, which could have
led to undesirable behaviour.
Example:
int foo() {
register int a __asm__("r7"); // r7 = frame-pointer in M-class ARM
__asm__ __volatile__("mov %0, r1" : "=r"(a) : : );
return a;
}
In contrast, GCC issues an error in the same scenario.
This patch detects writes to specific reserved registers in inline
assembly for ARM and emits an error in such case. The detection works
for output and input operands. Clobber operands are not handled here:
they are already covered at a later point in
AsmPrinter::emitInlineAsm(const MachineInstr *MI). The registers
covered are: program counter, frame pointer and base pointer.
This is ARM only. Therefore the implementation of other targets'
counterparts remain open to do.
Reviewers: efriedma
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, hiraditya, danielkiss, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76848
I only left it at the interface to ParseConstraints since that
needs updates to other callers in different files. I'll do that
as a follow up.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77892
Summary:
Remove usages of asserting vector getters in Type in preparation for the
VectorType refactor. The existence of these functions complicates the
refactor while adding little value.
Reviewers: stoklund, sdesmalen, efriedma
Reviewed By: sdesmalen
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77272
These should not be assuming address space 0. Calling getPointerTy is
generally the wrong thing to do, since you should already know the
type from the incoming IR.
Summary:
A bug report mentioned that LLVM was producing jumps off the end of a
function when using "asm goto with outputs". Further digging pointed to
MachineBasicBlocks that had their address taken and were indirect
targets of INLINEASM_BR being removed by BranchFolder, because their
predecessor list was empty, so they appeared to have no entry.
This was a cascading failure caused earlier, during Pre-RA instruction
scheduling. We have a few special cases in Pre-RA instruction scheduling
where we split a MachineBasicBlock in two. This requires careful
handing of predecessor and successor lists for a MachineBasicBlock that
was split, and careful handing of PHI MachineInstrs that referred to the
MachineBasicBlock before it was split.
The clue that led to this fix was the observation that many callers of
MachineBasicBlock::splice() frequently call
MachineBasicBlock::transferSuccessorsAndUpdatePHIs() to update their PHI
nodes after a splice. We don't want to reuse that method, as we have
custom successor transferring logic for this block split.
This patch fixes 2 pre-existing bugs, and adds tests.
The first bug was that MachineBasicBlock::splice() correctly handles
updating most successors and predecessors; we don't need to do anything
more than removing the previous fallthrough block from the first half of
the split block post splice. Previously, we were updating the successor
list incorrectly (updating successors updates predecessors).
The second bug was that PHI nodes that needed registers from the first
half of the split block were not having entries populated. The register
live out information was correct, and the FuncInfo->PHINodesToUpdate was
correct. Specifically, the check in SelectionDAGISel::FinishBasicBlock:
for (unsigned i = 0, e = FuncInfo->PHINodesToUpdate.size(); i != e; ++i) {
MachineInstrBuilder PHI(*MF, FuncInfo->PHINodesToUpdate[i].first);
if (!FuncInfo->MBB->isSuccessor(PHI->getParent()))
continue;
PHI.addReg(FuncInfo->PHINodesToUpdate[i].second).addMBB(FuncInfo->MBB);
was `continue`ing because FuncInfo->MBB tracks the second half of
the post-split block; no one was updating PHI entries for the first half
of the post-split block.
SelectionDAGBuilder::UpdateSplitBlock() already expects to perform
special handling for MachineBasicBlocks that were split post calls to
ScheduleDAGSDNodes::EmitSchedule(), so I'm confident that it's both
correct for ScheduleDAGSDNodes::EmitSchedule() to return the second half
of the split block `CopyBB` which updates `FuncInfo->MBB` (ie. the
current MachineBasicBlock being processed), and perform special handling
for this in SelectionDAGBuilder::UpdateSplitBlock().
Reviewers: void, craig.topper, efriedma
Reviewed By: void, efriedma
Subscribers: hfinkel, fhahn, MatzeB, efriedma, hiraditya, llvm-commits, srhines
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76961
The previous code used the type of the first field for the VT
passed to getNode for every field.
I've based the implementation here off what is done in visitSelect
as it removes the need to special case aggregates.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77093
Summary:
This is a roll forward of D77394 minus AlignmentFromAssumptions (which needs to be addressed separately)
Differences from D77394:
- DebugStr() now prints the alignment value or `None` and no more `Align(x)` or `MaybeAlign(x)`
- This is to keep Warning message consistent (CodeGen/SystemZ/alloca-04.ll)
- Removed a few unneeded headers from Alignment (since it's included everywhere it's better to keep the dependencies to a minimum)
Reviewers: courbet
Subscribers: sdardis, hiraditya, jrtc27, atanasyan, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77537
Instead, represent the mask as out-of-line data in the instruction. This
should be more efficient in the places that currently use
getShuffleVector(), and paves the way for further changes to add new
shuffles for scalable vectors.
This doesn't change the syntax in textual IR. And I don't currently plan
to change the bitcode encoding in this patch, although we'll probably
need to do something once we extend shufflevector for scalable types.
I expect that once this is finished, we can then replace the raw "mask"
with something more appropriate for scalable vectors. Not sure exactly
what this looks like at the moment, but there are a few different ways
we could handle it. Maybe we could try to describe specific shuffles.
Or maybe we could define it in terms of a function to convert a fixed-length
array into an appropriate scalable vector, using a "step", or something
like that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72467
Summary:
This change adds amdgcn.reloc.constant intrinsic to the amdgpu backend, which will compile into a relocation entry in the resulting elf.
The intrinsics takes a MetadataNode (String) as its only argument, which specifies the symbol name of the relocation entry.
`SelectionDAGBuilder::getValueImpl` is changed to allow metadata operands passed through to ISel.
Author: csyonghe <yonghe@google.com>
Reviewers: tpr, nhaehnle
Reviewed By: nhaehnle
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, yaxunl, dstuttard, t-tye, hiraditya, kerbowa, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76440
Summary:
This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html
See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790
Reviewers: courbet
Subscribers: jyknight, sdardis, nemanjai, hiraditya, kbarton, fedor.sergeev, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, jfb, PkmX, jocewei, Jim, lenary, s.egerton, pzheng, sameer.abuasal, apazos, luismarques, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77059
These transforms rely on a vector reduction flag on the SDNode
set by SelectionDAGBuilder. This flag exists because SelectionDAG
can't see across basic blocks so SelectionDAGBuilder is looking
across and saving the info. X86 is the only target that uses this
flag currently. By removing the X86 code we can remove the flag
and the SelectionDAGBuilder code.
This pass adds a dedicated IR pass for X86 that looks across the
blocks and transforms the IR into a form that the X86 SelectionDAG
can finish.
An advantage of this new approach is that we can enhance it to
shrink the phi nodes and final reduction tree based on the zeroes
that we need to concatenate to bring the partially reduced
reduction back up to the original width.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76649
Summary:
This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html
See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790
Reviewers: courbet
Subscribers: dylanmckay, sdardis, nemanjai, hiraditya, kbarton, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, PkmX, jocewei, Jim, lenary, s.egerton, pzheng, sameer.abuasal, apazos, luismarques, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76551
Summary:
* Remove a bunch of asserts checking for unsupported scalable types and
add some more now that they are supported.
* Propagate the scalable flag where necessary.
* Add another `EVT::getExtendedVectorVT` method that takes an
ElementCount parameter.
* Add `EVT::isExtendedScalableVector` and
`EVT::getExtendedVectorElementCount` - latter is currently unused.
Reviewers: sdesmalen, efriedma, rengolin, craig.topper, huntergr
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75672
SelectionDAG CSEs nodes based on their result type and operands, but not their flags. The flags are expected to be intersected when they are CSEd. In SelectionDAGBuilder, for FP nodes we manage both the fast math flags and the nofpexcept flag after the nodes have already been CSEd when they were created with getNode. The management of the fastmath flags before the constrained nodes prevents the nofpexcept management from working correctly.
This commit moves the FMF handling for constrained intrinsics into their visitor and disables the common FMF handling for these nodes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75224
I believe we were previously calculating a pointer info with the scalar base and an offset of 0. But that's not really where the gather is pointing. The offset is a function of the indices of the GEP we looked through.
Also set the size of the MachineMemOperand to UnknownSize
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76157
Summary:
callbr's indirect branches aren't expected to be taken, so reduce their
probabilities to 0 while increasing the default destination to 1. This
allows some code improvements through block placement.
Reviewers: nickdesaulniers
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72656
This node reads the rounding control which means it needs to be ordered properly with operations that change the rounding control. So it needs to be chained to maintain order.
This patch adds a chain input and output to the node and connects it to the chain in SelectionDAGBuilder. I've update all in-tree targets to connect their chain through their lowering code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75132
Summary:
Terminators in LLVM aren't prohibited from returning values. This means that
the "callbr" instruction, which is used for "asm goto", can support "asm goto
with outputs."
This patch removes all restrictions against "callbr" returning values. The
heavy lifting is done by the code generator. The "INLINEASM_BR" instruction's
a terminator, and the code generator doesn't allow non-terminator instructions
after a terminator. In order to correctly model the feature, we need to copy
outputs from "INLINEASM_BR" into virtual registers. Of course, those copies
aren't terminators.
To get around this issue, we split the block containing the "INLINEASM_BR"
right before the "COPY" instructions. This results in two cheats:
- Any physical registers defined by "INLINEASM_BR" need to be marked as
live-in into the block with the "COPY" instructions. This violates an
assumption that physical registers aren't marked as "live-in" until after
register allocation. But it seems as if the live-in information only
needs to be correct after register allocation. So we're able to get away
with this.
- The indirect branches from the "INLINEASM_BR" are moved to the "COPY"
block. This is to satisfy PHI nodes.
I've been told that MLIR can support this handily, but until we're able to
use it, we'll have to stick with the above.
Reviewers: jyknight, nickdesaulniers, hfinkel, MaskRay, lattner
Reviewed By: nickdesaulniers, MaskRay, lattner
Subscribers: rriddle, qcolombet, jdoerfert, MatzeB, echristo, MaskRay, xbolva00, aaron.ballman, cfe-commits, JonChesterfield, hiraditya, llvm-commits, rnk, craig.topper
Tags: #llvm, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69868
Summary:
This patch adds intrinsics and ISelDAG nodes for signed
and unsigned fixed-point division:
```
llvm.sdiv.fix.sat.*
llvm.udiv.fix.sat.*
```
These intrinsics perform scaled, saturating division
on two integers or vectors of integers. They are
required for the implementation of the Embedded-C
fixed-point arithmetic in Clang.
Reviewers: bjope, leonardchan, craig.topper
Subscribers: hiraditya, jdoerfert, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71550
This includes both GEPs where the indexed type is a scalable vector, and
GEPs where the result type is a scalable vector.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73602
Summary:
Backends should fold the subtraction into the comparison, but not all
seem to. Moreover, on targets where pointers are not integers, such as
CHERI, an integer subtraction is not appropriate. Instead we should just
compare the two pointers directly, as this should work everywhere and
potentially generate more efficient code.
Reviewers: bogner, lebedev.ri, efriedma, t.p.northover, uweigand, sunfish
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
Subscribers: dschuff, sbc100, arichardson, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, aheejin, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74454
This reverts commit ed29dbaafa.
I'm backing out D68945, which as the discussion for D73526 shows, doesn't
seem to handle the -O0 path through the codegen backend correctly. I'll
reland the patch when a fix is worked out, apologies for all the churn.
The two parent commits are part of this revert too.
Conflicts:
llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp
llvm/test/DebugInfo/X86/dbg-addr-dse.ll
SelectionDAGBuilder conflict is due to a nearby change in e39e2b4a79
that's technically unrelated. dbg-addr-dse.ll conflicted because
41206b61e3 (legitimately) changes the order of two lines.
There are further modifications to dbg-value-func-arg.ll: it landed after
the patch being reverted, and I've converted indirection to be represented
by the isIndirect field rather than DW_OP_deref.
This reverts commit 3137fe4d23.
I'm backing out D68945, which this patch is a follow up for. It'll be
re-landed when D68945 is fixed.
The changes to dbg-value-func-arg.ll occur because our handling of certain
kinds of location now mixes up indirection that happens at different points
in a DIExpression. While this is a regression, it's a return to the prior
behaviour while a better patch is sought.
The CATCHPAD node mostly existed to be selected into the EH_RESTORE
instruction, which sets the frame back up when 32-bit Windows exceptions
return to the parent function. However, creating this MachineInstr early
increases the risk that other passes will come along and insert
instructions that use the stack before ESP and EBP are restored. That
happened in PR44697.
Instead of representing these in the instruction stream early, delay it
until PEI. Mark the blocks where this needs to happen as EHPads, but not
funclet entry blocks. Passes after PEI have to be careful not to hoist
instructions that can use stack across frame setup instructions, so this
should be relatively reliable.
Fixes PR44697
Reviewed By: hans
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73752
Summary:
This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html
See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790
Reviewers: courbet
Subscribers: arsenm, dschuff, jyknight, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, aheejin, kbarton, fedor.sergeev, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, PkmX, jocewei, jsji, Jim, lenary, s.egerton, pzheng, sameer.abuasal, apazos, luismarques, kerbowa, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73885
This is based on this llvm-dev thread http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-December/137521.html
The current strategy for f16 is to promote type to float every except where the specific width is required like loads, stores, and bitcasts. This results in rounding occurring in odd places instead of immediately after arithmetic operations. This interacts in weird ways with the __fp16 type in clang which is a storage only type where arithmetic is always promoted to float. InstCombine can remove some fpext/fptruncs around such arithmetic and turn it into arithmetic on half. This wouldn't be so bad if SelectionDAG was able to put those fpext/fpround back in when it promotes.
It is also not obvious how to handle to make the existing strategy work with STRICT fp. We need to use STRICT versions of the conversions which require chain operands. But if the conversions are created for a bitcast, there is no place to get an appropriate chain from.
This patch implements a different strategy where conversions are emitted directly around arithmetic operations. And otherwise its passed around as an i16 including in arguments and return values. This can result in more conversions between arithmetic operations, but is closer to matching the IR the frontend generates for __fp16. And it will allow us to use the chain from constrained arithmetic nodes to link the STRICT_FP_TO_FP16/STRICT_FP16_TO_FP that will need to be added. I've set it up so that each target can opt into the new behavior. Converting all the targets myself was more than I was able to handle.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73749
Summary:
This is a follow up on D61634. It adds an LLVM IR intrinsic to allow better implementation of memcpy from C++.
A follow up CL will add the intrinsics in Clang.
Reviewers: courbet, theraven, t.p.northover, jdoerfert, tejohnson
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71710
and macro FUNCTION likewise. NFCI.
Some functions like fmuladd don't really have a node, we should divide
the declaration form those have node to avoid introducing fake nodes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72871
Summary:
This is a follow up on https://reviews.llvm.org/D71473#inline-647262.
There's a caveat here that `Align(1)` relies on the compiler understanding of `Log2_64` implementation to produce good code. One could use `Align()` as a replacement but I believe it is less clear that the alignment is one in that case.
Reviewers: xbolva00, courbet, bollu
Subscribers: arsenm, dylanmckay, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, hiraditya, kbarton, jrtc27, atanasyan, jsji, Jim, kerbowa, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73099
In LLVM IR, vscale can be represented with an intrinsic. For some targets,
this is equivalent to the constexpr:
getelementptr <vscale x 1 x i8>, <vscale x 1 x i8>* null, i32 1
This can be used to propagate the value in CodeGenPrepare.
In ISel we add a node that can be legalized to one or more
instructions to materialize the runtime vector length.
This patch also adds SVE CodeGen support for VSCALE, which maps this
node to RDVL instructions (for scaled multiples of 16bytes) or CNT[HSD]
instructions (scaled multiples of 2, 4, or 8 bytes, respectively).
Reviewers: rengolin, cameron.mcinally, hfinkel, sebpop, SjoerdMeijer, efriedma, lattner
Reviewed by: efriedma
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68203
This was dropping the invariant metadata on dead argument loads, so
they weren't deleted.
Atomics still need to be fixed the same way. Also, apparently store
was never preserving dereferencable which should also be fixed.
Code in getRoot made the assumption that every node in PendingLoads
must always itself have a dependency on the current DAG root node.
After the changes in 04a8696, it turns out that this assumption no
longer holds true, causing wrong codegen in some cases (e.g. stores
after constrained FP intrinsics might get deleted).
To fix this, we now need to make sure that the TokenFactor created
by getRoot always includes the previous root, if there is no implicit
dependency already present.
The original getControlRoot code already has exactly this check,
so this patch simply reuses that code now for getRoot as well.
This fixes the regression.
NFC if no constrained FP intrinsic is present.
We need to ensure that fpexcept.strict nodes are not optimized away even if
the result is unused. To do that, we need to chain them into the block's
terminator nodes, like already done for PendingExcepts.
This patch adds two new lists of pending chains, PendingConstrainedFP and
PendingConstrainedFPStrict to hold constrained FP intrinsic nodes without
and with fpexcept.strict markers. This allows not only to solve the above
problem, but also to relax chains a bit further by no longer flushing all
FP nodes before a store or other memory access. (They are still flushed
before nodes with other side effects.)
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72341
Summary:
This patch adds intrinsics and ISelDAG nodes for
signed and unsigned fixed-point division:
llvm.sdiv.fix.*
llvm.udiv.fix.*
These intrinsics perform scaled division on two
integers or vectors of integers. They are required
for the implementation of the Embedded-C fixed-point
arithmetic in Clang.
Patch by: ebevhan
Reviewers: bjope, leonardchan, efriedma, craig.topper
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Subscribers: Ka-Ka, ilya, hiraditya, jdoerfert, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70007
Summary:
Remove the restrictions that preventing "asm goto" from returning non-void
values. The values returned by "asm goto" are only valid on the "fallthrough"
path.
Reviewers: jyknight, nickdesaulniers, hfinkel
Reviewed By: jyknight, nickdesaulniers
Subscribers: rsmith, hiraditya, llvm-commits, cfe-commits, craig.topper, rnk
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69876
When the "disable-tail-calls" attribute was added, checks were added for
it in various backends. Now this code has proliferated, and it is
something the target is responsible for checking. Move that
responsibility back to the ISels (fast, global, and SD).
There's no major functionality change, except for targets that never
implemented this check.
This LLVM attribute was originally added in
d9699bc7bd (2015).
Reviewers: echristo, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72118
The NoFPExcept bit in SDNodeFlags currently defaults to true, unlike all
other such flags. This is a problem, because it implies that all code that
transforms SDNodes without copying flags can introduce a correctness bug,
not just a missed optimization.
This patch changes the default to false. This makes it necessary to move
setting the (No)FPExcept flag for constrained intrinsics from the
visitConstrainedIntrinsic routine to the generic visit routine at the
place where the other flags are set, or else the intersectFlagsWith
call would erase the NoFPExcept flag again.
In order to avoid making non-strict FP code worse, whenever
SelectionDAGISel::SelectCodeCommon matches on a set of orignal nodes
none of which can raise FP exceptions, it will preserve this property
on all results nodes generated, by setting the NoFPExcept flag on
those result nodes that would otherwise be considered as raising
an FP exception.
To check whether or not an SD node should be considered as raising
an FP exception, the following logic applies:
- For machine nodes, check the mayRaiseFPException property of
the underlying MI instruction
- For regular nodes, check isStrictFPOpcode
- For target nodes, check a newly introduced isTargetStrictFPOpcode
The latter is implemented by reserving a range of target opcodes,
similarly to how memory opcodes are identified. (Note that there a
bit of a quirk in identifying target nodes that are both memory nodes
and strict FP nodes. To simplify the logic, right now all target memory
nodes are automatically also considered strict FP nodes -- this could
be fixed by adding one more range.)
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71841
Summary:
We noticed in Julia that the sequence below no longer turned into
a sequence of FMA instructions in LLVM 7+, but it did in LLVM 6.
```
%29 = fmul contract <4 x double> %wide.load, %wide.load16
%30 = fmul contract <4 x double> %wide.load13, %wide.load17
%31 = fmul contract <4 x double> %wide.load14, %wide.load18
%32 = fmul contract <4 x double> %wide.load15, %wide.load19
%33 = fadd fast <4 x double> %vec.phi, %29
%34 = fadd fast <4 x double> %vec.phi10, %30
%35 = fadd fast <4 x double> %vec.phi11, %31
%36 = fadd fast <4 x double> %vec.phi12, %32
```
Unlike Clang, Julia doesn't set the `unsafe-fp-math=true` function
attribute, but rather emits more local instruction flags.
This partially undoes https://reviews.llvm.org/D46854 and if required I can try to minimize the test further.
Reviewers: spatel, mcberg2017
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: chriselrod, merge_guards_bot, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71495
getTargetConstant prevents any optimizations from operating on the
value and basically says its already been iseled. But since we
want the index to be in a register, this isn't true.
Prior to this we were generating a vbroadcast with an immediate
argument which is illegal and was flagged by the expensive checks
bot.
This reverts commit 1f3dd83cc1, reapplying
commit bb1b0bc4e5.
The original commit failed on some builds seemingly due to the use of a
bracketed constructor with an std::array, i.e. `std::array<> arr({...})`.
Previously, LLVM had no functional way of performing casts inside of a
DIExpression(), which made salvaging cast instructions other than Noop
casts impossible. This patch enables the salvaging of casts by using the
DW_OP_LLVM_convert operator for SExt and Trunc instructions.
There is another issue which is exposed by this fix, in which fragment
DIExpressions (which are preserved more readily by this patch) for
values that must be split across registers in ISel trigger an assertion,
as the 'split' fragments extend beyond the bounds of the fragment
DIExpression causing an error. This patch also fixes this issue by
checking the fragment status of DIExpressions which are to be split, and
dropping fragments that are invalid.
Summary: Add calculation for elements in structures in getting uniform
base for the Gather/Scatter intrinsic.
Reviewers: craig.topper, c-rhodes, RKSimon
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits, annita.zhang, LuoYuanke
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71442
Summary:
To find potential opportunities to use getMemBasePlusOffset() I looked at
all ISD::ADD uses found with the regex getNode\(ISD::ADD,.+,.+Ptr
in lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG. If this patch is accepted I will convert
the files in the individual backends too.
The motivation for this change is our out-of-tree CHERI backend
(https://github.com/CTSRD-CHERI/llvm-project). We use a separate register
type to store pointers (128-bit capabilities, which are effectively
unforgeable and monotonic fat pointers). These capabilities permit a
reduced set of operations and therefore use a separate ValueType (iFATPTR).
to represent pointers implemented as capabilities.
Therefore, we need to avoid using ISD::ADD for our patterns that operate
on pointers and need to use a function that chooses ISD::ADD or a new
ISD::PTRADD opcode depending on the value type.
We originally added a new DAG.getPointerAdd() function, but after this
patch series we can modify the implementation of getMemBasePlusOffset()
instead. Avoiding direct uses of ISD::ADD for pointer types will
significantly reduce the amount of assertion/instruction selection
failures for us in future upstream merges.
Reviewers: spatel
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: merge_guards_bot, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71207
During SelectionDAG, if a value which is associated with a DBG_VALUE
needs to be split across multiple registers, the DBG_VALUE will be split
into a set of fragment expressions to recreate the original value.
If one or more of these fragments cannot be created, they would
previously be silently dropped, causing the old debug value to live past
its expiry date. This patch fixes this issue by keeping invalid
fragments while setting their value as Undef.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70248
This has two main effects:
- Optimizes debug info size by saving 221.86 MB of obj file size in a
Windows optimized+debug build of 'all'. This is 3.03% of 7,332.7MB of
object file size.
- Incremental step towards decoupling target intrinsics.
The enums are still compact, so adding and removing a single
target-specific intrinsic will trigger a rebuild of all of LLVM.
Assigning distinct target id spaces is potential future work.
Part of PR34259
Reviewers: efriedma, echristo, MaskRay
Reviewed By: echristo, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71320
This adds support for constrained floating-point comparison intrinsics.
Specifically, we add:
declare <ty2>
@llvm.experimental.constrained.fcmp(<type> <op1>, <type> <op2>,
metadata <condition code>,
metadata <exception behavior>)
declare <ty2>
@llvm.experimental.constrained.fcmps(<type> <op1>, <type> <op2>,
metadata <condition code>,
metadata <exception behavior>)
The first variant implements an IEEE "quiet" comparison (i.e. we only
get an invalid FP exception if either argument is a SNaN), while the
second variant implements an IEEE "signaling" comparison (i.e. we get
an invalid FP exception if either argument is any NaN).
The condition code is implemented as a metadata string. The same set
of predicates as for the fcmp instruction is supported (except for the
"true" and "false" predicates).
These new intrinsics are mapped by SelectionDAG codegen onto two new
ISD opcodes, ISD::STRICT_FSETCC and ISD::STRICT_FSETCCS, again
representing quiet vs. signaling comparison operations. Otherwise
those nodes look like SETCC nodes, with an additional chain argument
and result as usual for strict FP nodes. The patch includes support
for the common legalization operations for those nodes.
The patch also includes full SystemZ back-end support for the new
ISD nodes, mapping them to all available SystemZ instruction to
fully implement strict semantics (scalar and vector).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69281
This patch implements the following changes:
1) SelectionDAGBuilder::visitConstrainedFPIntrinsic currently treats
each constrained intrinsic like a global barrier (e.g. a function call)
and fully serializes all pending chains. This is actually not required;
it is allowed for constrained intrinsics to be reordered w.r.t one
another or (nonvolatile) memory accesses. The MI-level scheduler already
allows for that flexibility, so it makes sense to allow it at the DAG
level as well.
This patch therefore changes the way chains for constrained intrisincs
are created, and handles them basically like load operations are handled.
This has the effect that constrained intrinsics are no longer serialized
against one another or (nonvolatile) loads. They are still serialized
against stores, but that seems hard to change with the current DAG chain
setup, and it also doesn't seem to be a big problem preventing DAG
2) The OPC_CheckFoldableChainNode check requires that each of the
intermediate nodes in a multi-node pattern match only has a single use.
This check tends to fail if those intermediate nodes are strict operations
as those have a chain output that typically indeed has another use.
However, we don't really need to consider chains here at all, since they
will all be rewritten anyway by UpdateChains later. Other parts of the
matcher therefore already ignore chains, but this hasOneUse check doesn't.
This patch replaces hasOneUse by a custom test that verifies there is no
more than one use of any non-chain output value.
In theory, this change could affect code unrelated to strict FP nodes,
but at least on SystemZ I could not find any single instance of that
happening
3) The SystemZ back-end currently does not allow matching multiply-and-
extend operations (32x32 -> 64bit or 64x64 -> 128bit FP multiply) for
strict FP operations. This was not possible in the past due to the
problems described under 1) and 2) above.
With those issues fixed, it is now possible to fully support those
instructions in strict mode as well, and this patch does so.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70913
MVE has a basic symmetry between it's normal loads/store operations and
the masked variants. This means that masked loads and stores can use
pre-inc and post-inc addressing modes, just like the standard loads and
stores already do.
To enable that, this patch adds all the relevant infrastructure for
treating masked loads/stores addressing modes in the same way as normal
loads/stores.
This involves:
- Adding an AddressingMode to MaskedLoadStoreSDNode, along with an extra
Offset operand that is added after the PtrBase.
- Extending the IndexedModeActions from 8bits to 16bits to store the
legality of masked operations as well as normal ones. This array is
fairly small, so doubling the size still won't make it very large.
Offset masked loads can then be controlled with
setIndexedMaskedLoadAction, similar to standard loads.
- The same methods that combine to indexed loads, such as
CombineToPostIndexedLoadStore, are adjusted to handle masked loads in
the same way.
- The ARM backend is then adjusted to make use of these indexed masked
loads/stores.
- The X86 backend is adjusted to hopefully be no functional changes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70176
This is recommit of commit e6584b2b7b, which was reverted in
30e7ee3c4b together with af57dbf12e.
Original message is below.
Enumerations that describe rounding mode and exception behavior were
defined inside ConstrainedFPIntrinsic. It makes sense to use the same
definitions to represent the same properties in other cases, not only
in constrained intrinsics. It was however inconvenient as required to
include constrained intrinsics definitions even if they were not needed.
Also using long scope prefix reduced readability.
This change moves these definitioins to the namespace llvm::fp.
No functional changes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69552
Summary
In several places we need to enumerate all constrained intrinsics or IR
nodes that should be represented by them. It is easy to miss some of
the cases. To make working with these intrinsics more convenient and
robust, this change introduces file containing definitions of all
constrained intrinsics and some of their properties. This file can be
included to generate constrained intrinsics processing code.
Reviewers: kpn, andrew.w.kaylor, cameron.mcinally, uweigand
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69887
AMDGPU needs to know the FP mode for the function to answer this
correctly when this is removed from the subtarget.
AArch64 had to make this more complicated by using this from an IR
hook, so add an IR typed overload.
and a follow-up NFC rearrangement as it's causing a crash on valid. Testcase is on the original review thread.
This reverts commits af57dbf12e and e6584b2b7b
Arthur Eubanks