Changes TTI function getIntImmCostInst to take an additional Instruction parameter,
which enables us to be able to check it is part of a min(max())/max(min()) pattern that will match SSAT.
We can then mark the constant used as free to prevent it being hoisted so SSAT can still be generated.
Required minor changes in some non-ARM backends to allow for the optional parameter to be included.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87457
Scheduling information is of little value when they may disrupt the
pipeline. This patch allows omitting the scheduling information for CSR
instructions while still setting `SchedMachineModel::CompleteModel`. For
specific cases, any scheduling information added will be used by the
scheduler.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85366
This does not result in changes for any of the current tests, but it might
improve debug information in some cases.
Reviewed By: luismarques
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86522
Currenlty assume x18 is used as pointer to shadow call stack. User shall pass
flags:
"-fsanitize=shadow-call-stack -ffixed-x18"
Runtime supported is needed to setup x18.
If SCS is desired, all parts of the program should be built with -ffixed-x18 to
maintain inter-operatability.
There's no particuluar reason that we must use x18 as SCS pointer. Any register
may be used, as long as it does not have designated purpose already, like RA or
passing call arguments.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84414
We weren't using this before, so none of the MachineFunction CFG edges had the
branch probability information added. As a result, block placement later in the
pipeline was flying blind.
This is enabled only with optimizations enabled like SelectionDAG.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86824
There's a special case in hasAttribute for None when pImpl is null. If pImpl is not null we dispatch to pImpl->hasAttribute which will always return false for Attribute::None.
So if we just want to check for None its sufficient to just check that pImpl is null. Which can even be done inline.
This patch adds a helper for that case which I hope will speed up our getSubtargetImpl implementations.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86744
Since the canonical floatig-point move is fsgnj rd, rs, rs, we should
handle this case in RISCVInstrInfo::isAsCheapAsAMove().
Reviewed By: lenary
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86518
The isTriviallyRematerializable hook is only called for instructions that are
tagged as isAsCheapAsAMove. Since ADDI 0 is used for "mv" it should definitely
be marked with "isAsCheapAsAMove". This change avoids one stack spill in most of
the atomic-rmw.ll tests functions. It also avoids stack spills in two of our
out-of-tree CHERI tests.
ORI/XORI with zero may or may not be the same as a move micro-architecturally,
but since we are already doing it for register == x0, we might as well
do the same if the immediate is zero.
Reviewed By: luismarques
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86480
Implements the assemble and disassemble support of RISCV Vector
extension zvamo instructions, base on the 0.9 spec version.
Reviewed by HsiangKai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85069
PseudoBRIND had seemingly inherited incorrect annotations denoting it as
a call instruction and that it defines X1/ra. This caused excess
save/restore code to be emitted for ra.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86286
In SelectionDAGBuilder always translate the fshl and fshr intrinsics to
FSHL and FSHR (or ROTL and ROTR) instead of lowering them to shifts and
ORs. Improve the legalization of FSHL and FSHR to avoid code quality
regressions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77152
This ensures that we never encode an instruction which is unavailable,
such as if we explicitly insert a forbidden instruction when lowering.
This is particularly important on RISC-V given its high degree of
modularity, and will become increasingly important as new standard
extensions appear.
Reviewed By: asb, lenary
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85015
This implements the assemble and disassemble support of RISCV Vector
extension Zvlsseg instructions, base on the 0.9 spec version.
Reviewed by HsiangKai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84416
The RISC-V Privileged Specification 1.11 defines `mcountinhibit`, which
has the same numeric CSR value as `mucounteren` from 1.09.1. This patch
enables the use of the old `mucounteren` name.
Patch by Yuichi Sugiyama.
Reviewed By: lenary, jrtc27, pzheng
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85067
This fixes the "Unable to insert indirect branch" fatal error sometimes
seen when generating position-independent code.
Patch by msizanoen1
Reviewed By: jrtc27
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84833
This patch implements initial backend support for a -mtune CPU controlled by a "tune-cpu" function attribute. If the attribute is not present X86 will use the resolved CPU from target-cpu attribute or command line.
This patch adds MC layer support a tune CPU. Each CPU now has two sets of features stored in their GenSubtargetInfo.inc tables . These features lists are passed separately to the Processor and ProcessorModel classes in tablegen. The tune list defaults to an empty list to avoid changes to non-X86. This annoyingly increases the size of static tables on all target as we now store 24 more bytes per CPU. I haven't quantified the overall impact, but I can if we're concerned.
One new test is added to X86 to show a few tuning features with mismatched tune-cpu and target-cpu/target-feature attributes to demonstrate independent control. Another new test is added to demonstrate that the scheduler model follows the tune CPU.
I have not added a -mtune to llc/opt or MC layer command line yet. With no attributes we'll just use the -mcpu for both. MC layer tools will always follow the normal CPU for tuning.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85165
Summary:
1. gcc uses `-march` and `-mtune` flag to chose arch and
pipeline model, but clang does not have `-mtune` flag,
we uses `-mcpu` to chose both infos.
2. Add SiFive e31 and u54 cpu which have default march
and pipeline model.
3. Specific `-mcpu` with rocket-rv[32|64] would select
pipeline model only, and use the driver's arch choosing
logic to get default arch.
Reviewers: lenary, asb, evandro, HsiangKai
Reviewed By: lenary, asb, evandro
Tags: #llvm, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71124
This patch provides optimization of bit manipulation operations by
enabling the +experimental-b target feature.
It adds matching of single block patterns of instructions to specific
bit-manip instructions from the ternary subset (zbt subextension) of the
experimental B extension of RISC-V.
It adds also the correspondent codegen tests.
This patch is based on Claire Wolf's proposal for the bit manipulation
extension of RISCV:
https://github.com/riscv/riscv-bitmanip/blob/master/bitmanip-0.92.pdf
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79875
This patch provides optimization of bit manipulation operations by
enabling the +experimental-b target feature.
It adds matching of single block patterns of instructions to specific
bit-manip instructions from the single-bit subset (zbs subextension) of
the experimental B extension of RISC-V.
It adds also the correspondent codegen tests.
This patch is based on Claire Wolf's proposal for the bit manipulation
extension of RISCV:
https://github.com/riscv/riscv-bitmanip/blob/master/bitmanip-0.92.pdf
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79874
This patch provides optimization of bit manipulation operations by
enabling the +experimental-b target feature.
It adds matching of single block patterns of instructions to specific
bit-manip instructions belonging to both the permutation and the base
subsets of the experimental B extension of RISC-V.
It adds also the correspondent codegen tests.
This patch is based on Claire Wolf's proposal for the bit manipulation
extension of RISCV:
https://github.com/riscv/riscv-bitmanip/blob/master/bitmanip-0.92.pdf
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79873
This patch provides optimization of bit manipulation operations by
enabling the +experimental-b target feature.
It adds matching of single block patterns of instructions to specific
bit-manip instructions from the permutation subset (zbp subextension) of
the experimental B extension of RISC-V.
It adds also the correspondent codegen tests.
This patch is based on Claire Wolf's proposal for the bit manipulation
extension of RISCV:
https://github.com/riscv/riscv-bitmanip/blob/master/bitmanip-0.92.pdf
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79871
This patch provides optimization of bit manipulation operations by
enabling the +experimental-b target feature.
It adds matching of single block patterns of instructions to specific
bit-manip instructions from the base subset (zbb subextension) of the
experimental B extension of RISC-V.
It adds also the correspondent codegen tests.
This patch is based on Claire Wolf's proposal for the bit manipulation
extension of RISCV:
https://github.com/riscv/riscv-bitmanip/blob/master/bitmanip-0.92.pdf
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79870
Summary:
Without these, the generic branch relaxation pass will underestimate the
range required for branches spanning these and we can end up with
"fixup value out of range" errors rather than relaxing the branches.
Some of the instructions in the expansion may end up being compressed
but exactly determining that is awkward, and these conservative values
should be safe, if slightly suboptimal in rare cases.
Reviewers: asb, lenary, luismarques, lewis-revill
Reviewed By: asb, luismarques
Subscribers: hiraditya, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, sabuasal, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, rkruppe, jfb, PkmX, jocewei, psnobl, benna, Jim, s.egerton, pzheng, sameer.abuasal, apazos, evandro, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77443
Because of the layout of stores (that don't have a destination operand)
this check is exactly the same as the one in
RISCVInstrInfo::isLoadFromStackSlot.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81805
The GlobalISelEmitter is stricter about matching timm instruction
outputs to timm inputs (although in an accidental sort of way that
doesn't hit a proper import failure error). Also, apparently no
intrinsic patterns were importing since the ID enum declaration was
missing.
Since the `RISCVExpandPseudo` pass has been split from
`RISCVExpandAtomicPseudo` pass, it would be nice to run the former as
early as possible (The latter has to be run as late as possible to
ensure correctness). Running earlier means we can reschedule these pairs
as we see fit.
Running earlier in the machine pass pipeline is good, but would mean
teaching many more passes about `hasLabelMustBeEmitted`. Splitting the
basic blocks also pessimises possible optimisations because some
optimisations are MBB-local, and others are disabled if the block has
its address taken (which is notionally what `hasLabelMustBeEmitted`
means).
This patch uses a new approach of setting the pre-instruction symbol on
the AUIPC instruction to a temporary symbol and referencing that. This
avoids splitting the basic block, but allows us to reference exactly the
instruction that we need to. Notionally, this approach seems more
correct because we do actually want to address a specific instruction.
This then allows the pass to be moved much earlier in the pass pipeline,
before both scheduling and register allocation. However, to do so we
must leave the MIR in SSA form (by not redefining registers), and so use
a virtual register for the intermediate value. By using this virtual
register, this pass now has to come before register allocation.
Reviewed By: luismarques, asb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82988
For an addition with an immediate in specific ranges, a pair of
addi-addi can be generated instead of the ordinary lui-addi-add serial.
Reviewed By: MaskRay, luismarques
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82262
... to shift/add or shift/sub.
Do not enable it on riscv32 with the M extension where decomposeMulByConstant
may not be an optimization.
Reviewed By: luismarques, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82660
We can often fold an ADDI into the offset of load/store instructions:
(load (addi base, off1), off2) -> (load base, off1+off2)
(store val, (addi base, off1), off2) -> (store val, base, off1+off2)
This is possible when the off1+off2 continues to fit the 12-bit immediate.
We remove the previous restriction where we would never fold the ADDIs if
the load/stores had nonzero offsets. We now do the fold the the resulting
constant still fits a 12-bit immediate, or if off1 is a variable's address
and we know based on that variable's alignment that off1+offs2 won't overflow.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79690
The pass to split atomic and non-atomic RISC-V pseudo-instructions was itself
split into two passes in D79635 / commit rG2cb0644f90b7, with the splitting of
non-atomic instructions being moved to the PreSched2 phase. A comment was
added to D79635 detailing a case where this caused problems, so this commit
moves the non-atomic split pass back to the PreEmitPass2 phase. This allows
the bulk of the changes from D79635 to remain committed, while addressing the
the reported problem (the pass split is now almost NFC). Once the root problem
is fixed we can move the (non-atomic) instruction splitting pass back to
earlier in the pipeline.
The pass to split atomic and non-atomic RISC-V pseudo-instructions was itself
split into two passes in D79635 / commit rG2cb0644f90b7, with the splitting of
non-atomic instructions being moved to the PreSched2 phase. A comment was
added to D79635 detailing a case where this caused problems, so this commit
moves the non-atomic split pass back to the PreEmitPass2 phase. This allows
the bulk of the changes from D79635 to remain committed, while addressing the
the reported problem (the pass split is now almost NFC). Once the root problem
is fixed we can move the (non-atomic) instruction splitting pass back to
earlier in the pipeline.
Summary:
This implements two hooks that attempt to avoid control flow for RISC-V. RISC-V
will lower SELECTs into control flow, which is not a great idea.
The hook `hasMultipleConditionRegisters()` turns off the following
DAGCombiner folds:
select(C0|C1, x, y) <=> select(C0, x, select(C1, x, y))
select(C0&C1, x, y) <=> select(C0, select(C1, x, y), y)
The second hook `setJumpIsExpensive` controls a flag that has a similar purpose
and is used in CodeGenPrepare and the SelectionDAGBuilder.
Both of these have the effect of ensuring more logic is done before fewer jumps.
Note: with the `B` extension, we may be able to lower select into a conditional
move instruction, so at some point these hooks will need to be guarded based on
enabled extensions.
Reviewed By: luismarques
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79268
Extracts the atomic pseudo-instructions' splitting from `riscv-expand-pseudo`
/ `RISCVExpandPseudo` into its own pass, `riscv-expand-atomic-pseudo` /
`RISCVExpandAtomicPseudo`. This allows for the expansion of atomic operations
to continue to happen late (the new pass is added in `addPreEmitPass2`, so
those expansions continue to happen in the same place), while the remaining
pseudo-instructions can now be expanded earlier and benefit from more
optimization passes. The nonatomics pass is now added in `addPreSched2`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79635
Assemble/disassemble RISC-V V extension instructions according to
latest version spec in https://github.com/riscv/riscv-v-spec/.
I have tested this patch using GNU toolchain. The encoding is aligned
to GNU assembler output. In this patch, there is a test case for each
instruction at least.
The V register definition is just for assemble/disassemble. Its type
is not important in this stage. I think it will be reviewed and modified
as we want to do codegen for scalable vector types.
This patch does not include Zvamo, Zvlsseg, and Zvediv.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69987
Meera Nakrani