Summary:
Without these, the generic branch relaxation pass will underestimate the
range required for branches spanning these and we can end up with
"fixup value out of range" errors rather than relaxing the branches.
Some of the instructions in the expansion may end up being compressed
but exactly determining that is awkward, and these conservative values
should be safe, if slightly suboptimal in rare cases.
Reviewers: asb, lenary, luismarques, lewis-revill
Reviewed By: asb, luismarques
Subscribers: hiraditya, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, sabuasal, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, rkruppe, jfb, PkmX, jocewei, psnobl, benna, Jim, s.egerton, pzheng, sameer.abuasal, apazos, evandro, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77443
Extracts the atomic pseudo-instructions' splitting from `riscv-expand-pseudo`
/ `RISCVExpandPseudo` into its own pass, `riscv-expand-atomic-pseudo` /
`RISCVExpandAtomicPseudo`. This allows for the expansion of atomic operations
to continue to happen late (the new pass is added in `addPreEmitPass2`, so
those expansions continue to happen in the same place), while the remaining
pseudo-instructions can now be expanded earlier and benefit from more
optimization passes. The nonatomics pass is now added in `addPreSched2`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79635
Jessica Clarke