We weren't using this before, so none of the MachineFunction CFG edges had the
branch probability information added. As a result, block placement later in the
pipeline was flying blind.
This is enabled only with optimizations enabled like SelectionDAG.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86824
There's a special case in hasAttribute for None when pImpl is null. If pImpl is not null we dispatch to pImpl->hasAttribute which will always return false for Attribute::None.
So if we just want to check for None its sufficient to just check that pImpl is null. Which can even be done inline.
This patch adds a helper for that case which I hope will speed up our getSubtargetImpl implementations.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86744
This patch implements initial backend support for a -mtune CPU controlled by a "tune-cpu" function attribute. If the attribute is not present X86 will use the resolved CPU from target-cpu attribute or command line.
This patch adds MC layer support a tune CPU. Each CPU now has two sets of features stored in their GenSubtargetInfo.inc tables . These features lists are passed separately to the Processor and ProcessorModel classes in tablegen. The tune list defaults to an empty list to avoid changes to non-X86. This annoyingly increases the size of static tables on all target as we now store 24 more bytes per CPU. I haven't quantified the overall impact, but I can if we're concerned.
One new test is added to X86 to show a few tuning features with mismatched tune-cpu and target-cpu/target-feature attributes to demonstrate independent control. Another new test is added to demonstrate that the scheduler model follows the tune CPU.
I have not added a -mtune to llc/opt or MC layer command line yet. With no attributes we'll just use the -mcpu for both. MC layer tools will always follow the normal CPU for tuning.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85165
As briefly discussed in IRC with @craig.topper,
the pass is disabled basically since it's original introduction (nov 2018)
due to known correctness issues (miscompilations),
and there hasn't been much work done to fix that.
While i won't promise that i will "fix" the pass,
i have looked at it previously, and i'm sure i won't try to fix it
if that requires actually fixing this existing code.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84775
We use a SmallString<512> and attempted to reserve enough space
for CPU plus Features, but that doesn't account for all the things
that get added to the string.
Reorder the string so the shortest things go first which shouldn't
exceed the small size. Finally add the feature string at the end
which might be long. This should ensure at most one heap allocation
without needing to use reserve.
I don't know if this matters much in practice, but I was looking
into something else that will require more code here and noticed
the odd reserve call.
Use SESES as the fallback at O0 where the optimized LVI pass isn't desired due
to its effect on build times at O0.
I updated the LVI tests since this changes the code gen for the tests touched in the parent revision.
This is a follow up to the comments I made here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80964
Hopefully we can continue the discussion here.
Also updated SESES to handle LFENCE instructions properly instead of adding
redundant LFENCEs. In particular, 1) no longer add LFENCE if the current
instruction being processed is an LFENCE and 2) no longer add LFENCE if the
instruction right before the instruction being processed is an LFENCE
Reviewed By: sconstab
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82037
This pass has no dependencies on other passes so conditionally
including it in the pipeline doens't do much. Just move it the
pass itself to keep it isolated.
A lot of what EVEX->VEX does is equivalent to what the
prioritization in the assembly parser does. When an AVX mnemonic
is used without any EVEX features or XMM16-31, the parser will
pick the VEX encoding.
Since codegen doesn't go through the parser, we should also
use VEX instructions when we can so that the code coming out of
integrated assembler matches what you'd get from outputing an
assembly listing and parsing it.
The pass early outs if AVX isn't enabled and uses TSFlags to
check for EVEX instructions before doing the more costly table
lookups. Hopefully that's enough to keep this from impacting
-O0 compile times.
@nikic raised an issue on D75936 that the added complexity to the O0 pipeline was causing noticeable slowdowns for `-O0` builds. This patch addresses the issue by adding a pass with equal security properties, but without any optimizations (and more importantly, without the need for expensive analysis dependencies).
Reviewers: nikic, craig.topper, mattdr
Reviewed By: craig.topper, mattdr
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80964
Adds a new data structure, ImmutableGraph, and uses RDF to find LVI gadgets and add them to a MachineGadgetGraph.
More specifically, a new X86 machine pass finds Load Value Injection (LVI) gadgets consisting of a load from memory (i.e., SOURCE), and any operation that may transmit the value loaded from memory over a covert channel, or use the value loaded from memory to determine a branch/call target (i.e., SINK).
Also adds a new target feature to X86: +lvi-load-hardening
The feature can be added via the clang CLI using -mlvi-hardening.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75936
This is an implementation of Speculative Execution Side Effect
Suppression which is intended as a last resort mitigation against Load
Value Injection, LVI, a newly disclosed speculative execution side
channel vulnerability.
One pager:
https://software.intel.com/security-software-guidance/software-guidance/load-value-injection
Deep dive:
https://software.intel.com/security-software-guidance/insights/deep-dive-load-value-injection
The mitigation consists of a compiler pass that inserts an LFENCE before
each memory read instruction, memory write instruction, and the first
branch instruction in a group of terminators at the end of a basic
block. The goal is to prevent speculative execution, potentially based
on misspeculated conditions and/or containing secret data, from leaking
that data via side channels embedded in such instructions.
This is something of a last-resort mitigation: it is expected to have
extreme performance implications and it may not be a complete mitigation
due to trying to enumerate side channels.
In addition to the full version of the mitigation, this patch
implements three flags to turn off part of the mitigation. These flags
are disabled by default. The flags are not intended to result in a
secure variant of the mitigation. The flags are intended to be used by
users who would like to experiment with improving the performance of
the mitigation. I ran benchmarks with each of these flags enabled in
order to find if there was any room for further optimization of LFENCE
placement with respect to LVI.
Performance Testing Results
When applying this mitigation to BoringSSL, we see the following
results. These are a summary/aggregation of the performance changes when
this mitigation is applied versus when no mitigation is applied.
Fully Mitigated vs Baseline
Geometric mean
0.071 (Note: This can be read as the ops/s of the mitigated
program was 7.1% of the ops/s of the unmitigated program.)
Minimum
0.041
Quartile 1
0.060
Median
0.063
Quartile 3
0.077
Maximum
0.230
Reviewed By: george.burgess.iv
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75939
Do not commit the llvm/test/ExecutionEngine/MCJIT/cet-code-model-lager.ll because it will
cause build bot fail(not suitable for window 32 target).
Summary:
This patch comes from H.J.'s 2bd54ce7fa
**This patch fix the failed llvm unit tests which running on CET machine. **(e.g. ExecutionEngine/MCJIT/MCJITTests)
The reason we enable IBT at "JIT compiled with CET" is mainly that: the JIT don't know the its caller program is CET enable or not.
If JIT's caller program is non-CET, it is no problem JIT generate CET code or not.
But if JIT's caller program is CET enabled, JIT must generate CET code or it will cause Control protection exceptions.
I have test the patch at llvm-unit-test and llvm-test-suite at CET machine. It passed.
and H.J. also test it at building and running VNCserver(Virtual Network Console), it works too.
(if not apply this patch, VNCserver will crash at CET machine.)
Reviewers: hjl.tools, craig.topper, LuoYuanke, annita.zhang, pengfei
Reviewed By: LuoYuanke
Subscribers: tstellar, efriedma, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76900
ExecutionEngine/MCJIT/cet-code-model-lager.ll is failing on 32-bit
windows, see llvm-commits thread for fef2dab.
This reverts commit 43f031d312
and the follow-ups fef2dab100 and
6a800f6f62.
Adds a new data structure, ImmutableGraph, and uses RDF to find LVI gadgets and add them to a MachineGadgetGraph.
More specifically, a new X86 machine pass finds Load Value Injection (LVI) gadgets consisting of a load from memory (i.e., SOURCE), and any operation that may transmit the value loaded from memory over a covert channel, or use the value loaded from memory to determine a branch/call target (i.e., SINK).
Also adds a new target feature to X86: +lvi-load-hardening
The feature can be added via the clang CLI using -mlvi-hardening.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75936
Adding a pass that replaces every ret instruction with the sequence:
pop <scratch-reg>
lfence
jmp *<scratch-reg>
where <scratch-reg> is some available scratch register, according to the
calling convention of the function being mitigated.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75935
Summary:
This patch comes from H.J.'s 2bd54ce7fa
**This patch fix the failed llvm unit tests which running on CET machine. **(e.g. ExecutionEngine/MCJIT/MCJITTests)
The reason we enable IBT at "JIT compiled with CET" is mainly that: the JIT don't know the its caller program is CET enable or not.
If JIT's caller program is non-CET, it is no problem JIT generate CET code or not.
But if JIT's caller program is CET enabled, JIT must generate CET code or it will cause Control protection exceptions.
I have test the patch at llvm-unit-test and llvm-test-suite at CET machine. It passed.
and H.J. also test it at building and running VNCserver(Virtual Network Console), it works too.
(if not apply this patch, VNCserver will crash at CET machine.)
Reviewers: hjl.tools, craig.topper, LuoYuanke, annita.zhang, pengfei
Subscribers: tstellar, efriedma, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76900
These transforms rely on a vector reduction flag on the SDNode
set by SelectionDAGBuilder. This flag exists because SelectionDAG
can't see across basic blocks so SelectionDAGBuilder is looking
across and saving the info. X86 is the only target that uses this
flag currently. By removing the X86 code we can remove the flag
and the SelectionDAGBuilder code.
This pass adds a dedicated IR pass for X86 that looks across the
blocks and transforms the IR into a form that the X86 SelectionDAG
can finish.
An advantage of this new approach is that we can enhance it to
shrink the phi nodes and final reduction tree based on the zeroes
that we need to concatenate to bring the partially reduced
reduction back up to the original width.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76649
Otherwise, the Win64 unwinder considers direct branches to such empty
trailing BBs to be a branch out of the function. It treats such a branch
as a tail call, which can only be part of an epilogue. If the unwinder
misclassifies such a branch as part of the epilogue, it will fail to
unwind the stack further. This can lead to bad stack traces, or failure
to handle exceptions properly. This is described in
https://llvm.org/PR45064#c4, and by the comment at the top of the
X86AvoidTrailingCallPass.cpp file.
It should be safe to insert int3 for such blocks. An empty trailing BB
that reaches this pass is pretty much guaranteed to be unreachable. If
a program executed such a block, it would fall off the end of the
function.
Most of the complexity in this patch comes from threading through the
"EHFuncletEntry" boolean on the MIRParser and registering the pass so we
can stop and start codegen around it. I used an MIR test because we
should teach LLVM to optimize away these branches as a follow-up.
Reviewed By: hans
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76531
-fuse-init-array is now the CC1 default but TargetLoweringObjectFileELF::UseInitArray still defaults to false.
The following two unknown OS target triples continue using .ctors/.dtors because InitializeELF is not called.
clang -target i386 -c a.c
clang -target x86_64 -c a.c
This cleanup fixes this as a bonus.
X86SpeculativeLoadHardeningPass::tracePredStateThroughCall can call
MCContext::createTempSymbol before TargetLoweringObjectFileELF::Initialize().
We need to call TargetLoweringObjectFileELF::Initialize() ealier.
test/CodeGen/X86/speculative-load-hardening-indirect.ll
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71360
UseInitArray is now the CC1 default but TargetLoweringObjectFileELF::UseInitArray still defaults to false.
The following two unknown OS target triples continue using .ctors/.dtors because InitializeELF is not called.
clang -target i386 -c a.c
clang -target x86_64 -c a.c
This cleanup fixes this as a bonus.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71360
This patch enables the debug entry values feature.
- Remove the (CC1) experimental -femit-debug-entry-values option
- Enable it for x86, arm and aarch64 targets
- Resolve the test failures
- Leave the llc experimental option for targets that do not
support the CallSiteInfo yet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73534
This patch enables the debug entry values feature.
- Remove the (CC1) experimental -femit-debug-entry-values option
- Enable it for x86, arm and aarch64 targets
- Resolve the test failures
- Leave the llc experimental option for targets that do not
support the CallSiteInfo yet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73534
float-point exception.
This patch also modify some mayRaiseFPException flag which set in D68854.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72750
Summary:
For builds with LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB=ON and BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=OFF
this change makes all symbols in the target specific libraries hidden
by default.
A new macro called LLVM_EXTERNAL_VISIBILITY has been added to mark symbols in these
libraries public, which is mainly needed for the definitions of the
LLVMInitialize* functions.
This patch reduces the number of public symbols in libLLVM.so by about
25%. This should improve load times for the dynamic library and also
make abi checker tools, like abidiff require less memory when analyzing
libLLVM.so
One side-effect of this change is that for builds with
LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB=ON and LLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB=ON some unittests that
access symbols that are no longer public will need to be statically linked.
Before and after public symbol counts (using gcc 8.2.1, ld.bfd 2.31.1):
nm before/libLLVM-9svn.so | grep ' [A-Zuvw] ' | wc -l
36221
nm after/libLLVM-9svn.so | grep ' [A-Zuvw] ' | wc -l
26278
Reviewers: chandlerc, beanz, mgorny, rnk, hans
Reviewed By: rnk, hans
Subscribers: merge_guards_bot, luismarques, smeenai, ldionne, lenary, s.egerton, pzheng, sameer.abuasal, MaskRay, wuzish, echristo, Jim, hiraditya, michaelplatings, chapuni, jholewinski, arsenm, dschuff, jyknight, dylanmckay, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, javed.absar, sbc100, jgravelle-google, aheejin, kbarton, fedor.sergeev, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, zzheng, edward-jones, mgrang, atanasyan, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, PkmX, jocewei, kristina, jsji, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54439
Currently -fuse-init-array option is not effective when target triple
does not specify os, on x86,x86_64.
i.e.
// -fuse-init-array is not honored.
$ clang -target i386 -fuse-init-array test.c -S
// -fuse-init-array is honored.
$ clang -target i386-linux -fuse-init-array test.c -S
This patch fixes first case.
And does cleanup.
Reviewers: rnk, craig.topper, fhahn, echristo
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71360
Summary:
A new function pass (Transforms/CFGuard/CFGuard.cpp) inserts CFGuard checks on
indirect function calls, using either the check mechanism (X86, ARM, AArch64) or
or the dispatch mechanism (X86-64). The check mechanism requires a new calling
convention for the supported targets. The dispatch mechanism adds the target as
an operand bundle, which is processed by SelectionDAG. Another pass
(CodeGen/CFGuardLongjmp.cpp) identifies and emits valid longjmp targets, as
required by /guard:cf. This feature is enabled using the `cfguard` CC1 option.
Reviewers: thakis, rnk, theraven, pcc
Subscribers: ychen, hans, metalcanine, dmajor, tomrittervg, alex, mehdi_amini, mgorny, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, steven_wu, dexonsmith, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65761
Summary:
This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html
See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790
Reviewers: courbet
Subscribers: jholewinski, arsenm, dschuff, jyknight, dylanmckay, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, aheejin, kbarton, fedor.sergeev, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, PkmX, jocewei, jsji, Jim, lenary, s.egerton, pzheng, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68993
llvm-svn: 375084
Summary:
Add function to AutoUpgrade to change the datalayout of old X86 datalayout strings.
This adds "-p270:32:32-p271:32:32-p272:64:64" to X86 datalayouts that are otherwise valid
and don't already contain it.
This also removes the compatibility changes in https://reviews.llvm.org/D66843.
Datalayout change in https://reviews.llvm.org/D64931.
Reviewers: rnk, echristo
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67631
llvm-svn: 372267
This is an alternative to D66980, which was reverted. Instead of
inserting a pseudo instruction that optionally expands to nothing, add a
pass that inserts int3 when appropriate after basic block layout.
Reviewers: hans
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67201
llvm-svn: 371466
This reverts r370525 (git commit 0bb1630685)
Also reverts r370543 (git commit 185ddc08ee)
The approach I took only works for functions marked `noreturn`. In
general, a call that is not known to be noreturn may be followed by
unreachable for other reasons. For example, there could be multiple call
sites to a function that throws sometimes, and at some call sites, it is
known to always throw, so it is followed by unreachable. We need to
insert an `int3` in these cases to pacify the Windows unwinder.
I think this probably deserves its own standalone, Win64-only fixup pass
that runs after block placement. Implementing that will take some time,
so let's revert to TrapUnreachable in the mean time.
llvm-svn: 370829
Users have complained llvm.trap produce two ud2 instructions on Win64,
one for the trap, and one for unreachable. This change fixes that.
TrapUnreachable was added and enabled for Win64 in r206684 (April 2014)
to avoid poorly understood issues with the Windows unwinder.
There seem to be two major things in play:
- the unwinder
- C++ EH, _CxxFrameHandler3 & co
The unwinder disassembles forward from the return address to scan for
epilogues. Inserting a ud2 had the effect of stopping the unwinder, and
ensuring that it ran the EH personality function for the current frame.
However, it's not clear what the unwinder does when the return address
happens to be the last address of one function and the first address of
the next function.
The Visual C++ EH personality, _CxxFrameHandler3, needs to figure out
what the current EH state number is. It does this by consulting the
ip2state table, which maps from PC to state number. This seems to go
wrong when the return address is the last PC of the function or catch
funclet.
I'm not sure precisely which system is involved here, but in order to
address these real or hypothetical problems, I believe it is enough to
insert int3 after a call site if it would otherwise be the last
instruction in a function or funclet. I was able to reproduce some
similar problems locally by arranging for a noreturn call to appear at
the end of a catch block immediately before an unrelated function, and I
confirmed that the problems go away when an extra trailing int3
instruction is added.
MSVC inserts int3 after every noreturn function call, but I believe it's
only necessary to do it if the call would be the last instruction. This
change inserts a pseudo instruction that expands to int3 if it is in the
last basic block of a function or funclet. I did what I could to run the
Microsoft compiler EH tests, and the ones I was able to run showed no
behavior difference before or after this change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66980
llvm-svn: 370525
Amara Emerson