SUMMARY:
1. in the patch , remove setting storageclass in function .getXCOFFSection and construct function of class MCSectionXCOFF
there are
XCOFF::StorageMappingClass MappingClass;
XCOFF::SymbolType Type;
XCOFF::StorageClass StorageClass;
in the MCSectionXCOFF class,
these attribute only used in the XCOFFObjectWriter, (asm path do not need the StorageClass)
we need get the value of StorageClass, Type,MappingClass before we invoke the getXCOFFSection every time.
actually , we can get the StorageClass of the MCSectionXCOFF from it's delegated symbol.
2. we also change the oprand of branch instruction from symbol name to qualify symbol name.
for example change
bl .foo
extern .foo
to
bl .foo[PR]
extern .foo[PR]
3. and if there is reference indirect call a function bar.
we also add
extern .bar[PR]
Reviewers: Jason liu, Xiangling Liao
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84765
Summary:
The standard data emission directives (e.g. .short, .long) in the AIX assembler
have the unintended consequence of aligning their output to the natural byte
boundary. This cause problems because we aren't expecting behavior from the
Data*bitsDirectives, so the final alignment of data isn't correct in some cases
on AIX.
This patch updated the Data*bitsDirectives to use .vbyte pseudo-ops instead to emit the
data, since we will emit the .align directives as needed. We update the existing
testcases and add a test for emission of struct data.
Reviewers: hubert.reinterpretcast, Xiangling_L, jasonliu
Reviewed By: hubert.reinterpretcast, jasonliu
Subscribers: wuzish, nemanjai, hiraditya, kbarton, arphaman, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80934
To be consistent with other directives like '.comm', '.lcomm', we remove
the spaces after the comma for '.csect' on AIX.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80247
Summary:
This patch tries to emit the correct alignment result for both
object file generation path and assembly path.
Reviewed by: hubert.reinterpretcast, DiggerLin, daltenty
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79127
SUMMARY:
We currently emit a reference for function address constants as labels;
for example:
foo_ptr:
.long foo
however, there may be no such label in the case where the function is
undefined. Although the label exists when the function is defined, we
will (to be consistent) also use a csect reference in that case.
Reviewers: daltenty,hubert.reinterpretcast,jasonliu,Xiangling_L
Subscribers: cebowleratibm, wuzish, nemanjai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71144
diggerlin