The ARM backend can eliminate cmp instructions by reusing flags from a
nearby sub instruction with similar arguments.
Don't do that if the sub is predicated - the flags are not written
unconditionally.
<rdar://problem/12263428>
llvm-svn: 163535
Now that it is possible to dynamically tie MachineInstr operands,
predicated instructions are possible in SSA form:
%vreg3<def> = SUBri %vreg1, -2147483647, pred:14, pred:%noreg, %opt:%noreg
%vreg4<def,tied1> = MOVCCr %vreg3<tied0>, %vreg1, %pred:12, pred:%CPSR
Becomes a predicated SUBri with a tied imp-use:
SUBri %vreg1, -2147483647, pred:13, pred:%CPSR, opt:%noreg, %vreg1<imp-use,tied0>
This means that any instruction that is safe to move can be folded into
a MOVCC, and the *CC pseudo-instructions are no longer needed.
The test case changes reflect that Thumb2SizeReduce recognizes the
predicated instructions. It didn't understand the pseudos.
llvm-svn: 163274
Previous patch accidentally decided it couldn't convert a VFP to a
NEON instruction after it had already destroyed the old one. Not a
good move.
llvm-svn: 163230
NEON domain conversion was too heavy-handed with its widened
registers, which could have stripped existing instructions of their
dependency, leaving them vulnerable to scheduling errors.
llvm-svn: 163070
I have tested the fix, but have not been successfull in generating
a robust unit test. This can only be exposed through particular
register assignments.
llvm-svn: 162821
This wasn't the right way to enforce ordering of atomics.
We are already setting the isVolatile bit on memory operands of atomic
operations which is good enough to enforce the correct ordering.
llvm-svn: 162732
It is not safe to use normal LDR instructions because they may be
reordered by the scheduler. The ATOMIC_LDR pseudos have a mayStore flag
that prevents reordering.
Atomic loads are also prevented from participating in rematerialization
and load folding.
llvm-svn: 162713
PEI can't handle the pseudo-instructions. This can be removed when the
pseudo-instructions are replaced by normal predicated instructions.
Fixes PR13628.
llvm-svn: 162130
It is not my plan to duplicate the entire ARM instruction set with
predicated versions. We need a way of representing predicated
instructions in SSA form without requiring a separate opcode.
Then the pseudo-instructions can go away.
llvm-svn: 162061
The ARM select instructions are just predicated moves. If the select is
the only use of an operand, the instruction defining the operand can be
predicated instead, saving one instruction and decreasing register
pressure.
This implementation can turn AND/ORR/EOR instructions into their
corresponding ANDCC/ORRCC/EORCC variants. Ideally, we should be able to
predicate any instruction, but we don't yet support predicated
instructions in SSA form.
llvm-svn: 161994
It is safe if CPSR is killed or re-defined.
When we are done with the basic block, check whether CPSR is live-out.
Do not optimize away cmp if CPSR is live-out.
llvm-svn: 160090
My last checkin was apparently not the branch I intended. It was missing one change (added by chandlerc), and contained a spurious change.
llvm-svn: 159548
Use getUniqueVRegDef.
Replace a loop with existing interfaces: modifiesRegister and readsRegister.
Factor out code into inline functions and simplify the code.
llvm-svn: 159470
The TargetInstrInfo::getNumMicroOps API does not change, but soon it
will be used by MachineScheduler. Now each subtarget can specify the
number of micro-ops per itinerary class. For ARM, this is currently
always dynamic (-1), because it is used for load/store multiple which
depends on the number of register operands.
Zero is now a valid number of micro-ops. This can be used for
nop pseudo-instructions or instructions that the hardware can squash
during dispatch.
llvm-svn: 159406
More condition codes are included when deciding whether to remove cmp after
a sub instruction. Specifically, we extend from GE|LT|GT|LE to
GE|LT|GT|LE|HS|LS|HI|LO|EQ|NE. If we have "sub a, b; cmp b, a; movhs", we
should be able to replace with "sub a, b; movls".
rdar: 11725965
llvm-svn: 159166
This is a minor drive-by fix with no robust way to unit test.
As an example see neon-div.ll:
SU(16): %Q8<def> = VMOVLsv4i32 %D17, pred:14, pred:%noreg, %Q8<imp-use,kill>
val SU(1): Latency=2 Reg=%Q8
...should be latency=1
llvm-svn: 158960
Minor drive by fix to cleanup latency computation. Calling
getOperandLatency with a deliberately incorrect operand index does not
give you the latency you want.
llvm-svn: 158959
This patch will optimize the following cases:
sub r1, r3 | sub r1, imm
cmp r3, r1 or cmp r1, r3 | cmp r1, imm
bge L1
TO
subs r1, r3
bge L1 or ble L1
If the branch instruction can use flag from "sub", then we can replace
"sub" with "subs" and eliminate the "cmp" instruction.
rdar: 10734411
llvm-svn: 156599
This patch will optimize the following cases:
sub r1, r3 | sub r1, imm
cmp r3, r1 or cmp r1, r3 | cmp r1, imm
bge L1
TO
subs r1, r3
bge L1 or ble L1
If the branch instruction can use flag from "sub", then we can replace
"sub" with "subs" and eliminate the "cmp" instruction.
rdar: 10734411
llvm-svn: 156550
A MOVCCr instruction can be commuted by inverting the condition. This
can help reduce register pressure and remove unnecessary copies in some
cases.
<rdar://problem/11182914>
llvm-svn: 154033
ARM recently gained DPair, DTriple, and DQuad register classes.
Update copyPhysReg() to handle copies in these register classes.
No test case, it is difficult to make the register allocator emit the
odd copies reliably. The missing DPair copy caused a failure on
partialsums in the nightly test suite.
<rdar://problem/11147997>
llvm-svn: 153686
The arm_neon intrinsics can create virtual registers from the DPair
register class which allows both even-odd and odd-even D-register pairs.
This fixes PR12389.
llvm-svn: 153603
produces a 32-bit immediate which is consumed by the use. It tries to
fold the immediate by breaking it into two parts and fold them into the
immmediate fields of two uses. e.g
movw r2, #40885
movt r3, #46540
add r0, r0, r3
=>
add.w r0, r0, #3019898880
add.w r0, r0, #30146560
;
However, this transformation is incorrect if the user produces a flag. e.g.
movw r2, #40885
movt r3, #46540
adds r0, r0, r3
=>
add.w r0, r0, #3019898880
adds.w r0, r0, #30146560
Note the adds.w may not set the carry flag even if the original sequence
would.
rdar://11116189
llvm-svn: 153484
Jakob Stoklund Olesen