Summary:
This patch removes the "//----" frames and "///" leading lines from
docstring comments. We already have code doing transformations like this in
modify-python-lldb.py, but that's a script I'd like to remove. Instead
of running these transformations everytime we run swig, we can just
perform equivalent on its input once.
This patch can be reproduced (e.g. for downstream merges) with the
following "sweet" perl command:
perl -i -p -e 'BEGIN{ $/ = undef;} s:(" *\n) *//-----*\n:\1:gs; s:^( *)/// ?:\1:gsm; s:^ *//------*\n( *\n)?( *"):\2:gsm; s: *$::gsm; s:\n *"\):"):gsm' scripts/interface/*.i
This command produces nearly equivalent python files to those produced
by the relevant code in modify-python-lldb.py. The only difference I
noticed is that here I am slightly more agressive in removing trailing
newlines from docstring comments (the python script seems to leave
newlines in class-level docstrings).
Reviewers: amccarth, clayborg, jingham, aprantl
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60498
llvm-svn: 358683
Summary:
Our python version of the SB API has (the python equivalent of)
operator bool, but the C++ version doesn't.
This is because our python operators are added by modify-python-lldb.py,
which performs postprocessing on the swig-generated interface files.
In this patch, I add the "operator bool" to all SB classes which have an
IsValid method (which is the same logic used by modify-python-lldb.py).
This way, we make the two interfaces more constent, and it allows us to
rely on swig's automatic syntesis of python __nonzero__ methods instead
of doing manual fixups.
Reviewers: zturner, jingham, clayborg, jfb, serge-sans-paille
Subscribers: jdoerfert, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58792
llvm-svn: 355824
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary:
This patch adds a framework for adding descriptions to the command completions we provide.
It also adds descriptions for completed top-level commands so that we can test this code.
Completions are in general supposed to be displayed alongside the completion itself. The descriptions
can be used to provide additional information about the completion to the user. Examples for descriptions
are function signatures when completing function calls in the expression command or the binary name
when providing completion for a symbol.
There is still some boilerplate code from the old completion API left in LLDB (mostly because the respective
APIs are reused for non-completion related purposes, so the CompletionRequest doesn't make sense to be
used), so that's why I still had to change some function signatures. Also, as the old API only passes around a
list of matches, and the descriptions are for these functions just another list, I had to add some code that
essentially just ensures that both lists are always the same side (e.g. all the manual calls to
`descriptions->AddString(X)` below a `matches->AddString(Y)` call).
The initial command descriptions that come with this patch are just reusing the existing
short help that is already added in LLDB.
An example completion with descriptions looks like this:
```
(lldb) pl
Available completions:
platform -- Commands to manage and create platforms.
plugin -- Commands for managing LLDB plugins.
```
Reviewers: #lldb, jingham
Reviewed By: #lldb, jingham
Subscribers: jingham, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51175
llvm-svn: 342181
Summary:
This patch adds the possibility to specify an exit code when calling quit.
We accept any int, even though it depends on the user what happens if the int is
out of the range of what the operating system supports as exit codes.
Fixes rdar://problem/38452312
Reviewers: davide, jingham, clayborg
Reviewed By: jingham
Subscribers: clayborg, jingham, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48659
llvm-svn: 336824
The core of this change is the new CommandInterpreter::m_command_state,
which models the state transitions for interactive commands, including
an "interrupted" state transition.
In general, command interruption requires cooperation from the code
executing the command, which needs to poll for interruption requests
through CommandInterpreter::WasInterrupted().
CommandInterpreter::PrintCommandOutput() implements an optionally
interruptible printing of the command output, which for large outputs
was likely the longest blocking part.
(ex. target modules dump symtab on a complex binary could take 10+ minutes)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37923
llvm-svn: 315037
The core of this change is the new CommandInterpreter::m_command_state, which
models the state transitions for interactive commands, including an
"interrupted" state transition.
In general, command interruption requires cooperation from the code executing
the command, which needs to poll for interruption requests through
CommandInterpreter::WasInterrupted().
CommandInterpreter::PrintCommandOutput() implements an optionally
interruptible printing of the command output, which for large outputs was
likely the longest blocking part. (ex. target modules dump symtab on a
complex binary could take 10+ minutes)
patch by lemo
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37923
llvm-svn: 313904
Summary:
Move scripts/Python/interface to scripts/interface so that we
can start making iterative improvements towards sharing the
interface files between multiple languages (each of which would
have their own directory as now).
Test Plan: Build and see.
Reviewers: zturner, emaste, clayborg
Reviewed By: clayborg
Subscribers: mjsabby, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9212
llvm-svn: 235676
Pavel Labath