Summary:
this revision adds Lexing, Parsing and Basic Semantic for the consteval specifier as specified by http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2018/p1073r3.html
with this patch, the consteval specifier is treated as constexpr but can only be applied to function declaration.
Changes:
- add the consteval keyword.
- add parsing of consteval specifier for normal declarations and lambdas expressions.
- add the whether a declaration is constexpr is now represented by and enum everywhere except for variable because they can't be consteval.
- adapt diagnostic about constexpr to print constexpr or consteval depending on the case.
- add tests for basic semantic.
Reviewers: rsmith, martong, shafik
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: eraman, efriedma, rnkovacs, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61790
llvm-svn: 363362
Summary:
In an effort to make Process more language agnostic, I removed
GetCPPLanguageRuntime from Process. I'm following up now with an equivalent
change for ObjC.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63052
llvm-svn: 362981
Add a function to flatten the nested aggregate type
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62702
Patch by Wanyi Ye <kusmour@gmail.com>
llvm-svn: 362543
Summary:
NFC = [[ https://llvm.org/docs/Lexicon.html#nfc | Non functional change ]]
This commit is the result of modernizing the LLDB codebase by using
`nullptr` instread of `0` or `NULL`. See
https://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/modernize-use-nullptr.html
for more information.
This is the command I ran and I to fix and format the code base:
```
run-clang-tidy.py \
-header-filter='.*' \
-checks='-*,modernize-use-nullptr' \
-fix ~/dev/llvm-project/lldb/.* \
-format \
-style LLVM \
-p ~/llvm-builds/debug-ninja-gcc
```
NOTE: There were also changes to `llvm/utils/unittest` but I did not
include them because I felt that maybe this library shall be updated in
isolation somehow.
NOTE: I know this is a rather large commit but it is a nobrainer in most
parts.
Reviewers: martong, espindola, shafik, #lldb, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: arsenm, jvesely, nhaehnle, hiraditya, JDevlieghere, teemperor, rnkovacs, emaste, kubamracek, nemanjai, ki.stfu, javed.absar, arichardson, kbarton, jrtc27, MaskRay, atanasyan, dexonsmith, arphaman, jfb, jsji, jdoerfert, lldb-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #lldb, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61847
llvm-svn: 361484
Summary:
This is the final phase of the refactoring towards using llvm::Expected
and llvm::Error in the ASTImporter API.
This involves the following:
- remove old Import functions which returned with a pointer,
- use the Import_New functions (which return with Err or Expected) everywhere
and handle their return value
- rename Import_New functions to Import
This affects both Clang and LLDB.
Reviewers: shafik, teemperor, aprantl, a_sidorin, balazske, a.sidorin
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, cfe-commits, lldb-commits
Tags: #clang, #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61438
llvm-svn: 360760
Summary:
r360109 added a new enum case, causing lldb build to fail with several errors like:
lldb/source/Symbol/ClangASTContext.cpp:4342:11: error: enumeration value 'MacroQualified' not handled in switch [-Werror,-Wswitch]
switch (qual_type->getTypeClass()) {
^
This adds the missing switch cases.
I'm not an lldb maintainer and just used my best judgement that it's probably expected that we break in these cases. Feel free to ping / revert / fix this change if this behavior is not appropriate.
Reviewers: gribozavr
Reviewed By: gribozavr
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61640
llvm-svn: 360146
This caused Clang to start erroring on the following:
struct S {
template <typename = int> explicit S();
};
struct T : S {};
struct U : T {
U();
};
U::U() {}
$ clang -c /tmp/x.cc
/tmp/x.cc:10:4: error: call to implicitly-deleted default constructor of 'T'
U::U() {}
^
/tmp/x.cc:5:12: note: default constructor of 'T' is implicitly deleted
because base class 'S' has no default constructor
struct T : S {};
^
1 error generated.
See discussion on the cfe-commits email thread.
This also reverts the follow-ups r359966 and r359968.
> this patch adds support for the explicit bool specifier.
>
> Changes:
> - The parsing for the explicit(bool) specifier was added in ParseDecl.cpp.
> - The storage of the explicit specifier was changed. the explicit specifier was stored as a boolean value in the FunctionDeclBitfields and in the DeclSpec class. now it is stored as a PointerIntPair<Expr*, 2> with a flag and a potential expression in CXXConstructorDecl, CXXDeductionGuideDecl, CXXConversionDecl and in the DeclSpec class.
> - Following the AST change, Serialization, ASTMatchers, ASTComparator and ASTPrinter were adapted.
> - Template instantiation was adapted to instantiate the potential expressions of the explicit(bool) specifier When instantiating their associated declaration.
> - The Add*Candidate functions were adapted, they now take a Boolean indicating if the context allowing explicit constructor or conversion function and this boolean is used to remove invalid overloads that required template instantiation to be detected.
> - Test for Semantic and Serialization were added.
>
> This patch is not yet complete. I still need to check that interaction with CTAD and deduction guides is correct. and add more tests for AST operations. But I wanted first feedback.
> Perhaps this patch should be spited in smaller patches, but making each patch testable as a standalone may be tricky.
>
> Patch by Tyker
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60934
llvm-svn: 360024
Summary:
According to [C128] "Virtual functions should specify exactly one
of `virtual`, `override`, or `final`", I've added override where a
virtual function is overriden but the explicit `override` keyword
was missing. Whenever both `virtual` and `override` were specified,
I removed `virtual`. As C.128 puts it:
> [...] writing more than one of these three is both redundant and
> a potential source of errors.
I anticipate a discussion about whether or not to add `override` to
destructors but I went for it because of an example in [ISOCPP1000].
Let me repeat the comment for you here:
Consider this code:
```
struct Base {
virtual ~Base(){}
};
struct SubClass : Base {
~SubClass() {
std::cout << "It works!\n";
}
};
int main() {
std::unique_ptr<Base> ptr = std::make_unique<SubClass>();
}
```
If for some odd reason somebody removes the `virtual` keyword from the
`Base` struct, the code will no longer print `It works!`. So adding
`override` to destructors actively protects us from accidentally
breaking our code at runtime.
[C128]: https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/blob/master/CppCoreGuidelines.md#c128-virtual-functions-should-specify-exactly-one-of-virtual-override-or-final
[ISOCPP1000]: https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/issues/1000#issuecomment-476951555
Reviewers: teemperor, JDevlieghere, davide, shafik
Reviewed By: teemperor
Subscribers: kwk, arphaman, kadircet, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61440
llvm-svn: 359868
by respecting the "artificial" attribute on variables. Function
arguments that are artificial and useful to end-users are being
whitelisted by the language runtime.
<rdar://problem/45322477>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61451
llvm-svn: 359841
Summary:
This patch is a follow-up for D58125. It implements the manual instantiation and merging of 'std' templates like
`std::vector` and `std::shared_ptr` with information from the debug info AST. This (finally) allows using these classes
in the expression evaluator like every other class (i.e. things like `vec.size()` and shared_ptr debugging now works, yay!).
The main logic is the `CxxModuleHandler` which intercept the ASTImporter import process and replaces any `std` decls
by decls from the C++ module. The decls from the C++ module are "imported" by just deserializing them directly in
the expression evaluation context. This is mostly because we don't want to rely on the ASTImporter to correctly import
these declarations, but in the future we should also move to the ASTImporter for that.
This patch doesn't contain the automatic desugaring for result variables. This means that if you call for example
`size` of `std::vector` you maybe get some very verbose typedef'd type as the variable type, e.g.
`std::vector<int, std::allocator<int>>::value_type`.
This is not only unreadable, it also means that our ASTImporter has to import all these types and associated
decls into the persisent variable context. This currently usually leads to some assertion getting triggered
in Clang when the ASTImporter either makes a mistake during importing or our debug info AST is inconsitent.
The current workaround I use in the tests is to just cast the result to it's actual type (e.g. `size_t` or `int`) to prevent
the ASTImporter from having to handle all these complicated decls.
The automatic desugaring will be a future patch because I'm not happy yet with the current code for that and because
I anticipate that this will be a controversial patch.
Reviewers: aprantl, shafik, jingham, martong, serge-sans-paille
Reviewed By: martong
Subscribers: balazske, rnkovacs, mgorny, mgrang, abidh, jdoerfert, lldb-commits
Tags: #c_modules_in_lldb, #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59537
llvm-svn: 359538
A lot of comments in LLDB are surrounded by an ASCII line to delimit the
begging and end of the comment.
Its use is not really consistent across the code base, sometimes the
lines are longer, sometimes they are shorter and sometimes they are
omitted. Furthermore, it looks kind of weird with the 80 column limit,
where the comment actually extends past the line, but not by much.
Furthermore, when /// is used for Doxygen comments, it looks
particularly odd. And when // is used, it incorrectly gives the
impression that it's actually a Doxygen comment.
I assume these lines were added to improve distinguishing between
comments and code. However, given that todays editors and IDEs do a
great job at highlighting comments, I think it's worth to drop this for
the sake of consistency. The alternative is fixing all the
inconsistencies, which would create a lot more churn.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60508
llvm-svn: 358135
Summary:
This patch marks the inline namespaces from DWARF as inline and also ensures that looking
up declarations now follows the lookup rules for inline namespaces.
Reviewers: aprantl, shafik, serge-sans-paille
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: eraman, jdoerfert, lldb-commits
Tags: #c_modules_in_lldb, #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59198
llvm-svn: 355897
My apologies for the large patch. With the exception of ConstString.h
itself it was entirely produced by sed.
ConstString has exactly one const char * data member, so passing a
ConstString by reference is not any more efficient than copying it by
value. In both cases a single pointer is passed. But passing it by
value makes it harder to accidentally return the address of a local
object.
(This fixes rdar://problem/48640859 for the Apple folks)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59030
llvm-svn: 355553
In r353906 we hooked up clang and lldb's reproducer infrastructure to
capture files used by clang. This patch adds the necessary logic to have
clang reuse the files from lldb's reproducer during replay.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58309
llvm-svn: 354283
class template back to the template.
Previously, when the ASTImporter imported the class, it didn't know that
it was the pattern of a class template, so made the class a name lookup
result for the name of the template, resulting in ambiguity errors when
naming the template.
Due to a clang bug (fixed in r354091, reverted and soon to be
re-committed), ambiguity errors between a template and a non-template
were previously not diagnosed. Once r354091 is re-committed, this will
be covered by existing lldb tests.
llvm-svn: 354173
The `ap` suffix is a remnant of lldb's former use of auto pointers,
before they got deprecated. Although all their uses were replaced by
unique pointers, some variables still carried the suffix.
In r353795 I removed another auto_ptr remnant, namely redundant calls to
::get for unique_pointers. Jim justly noted that this is a good
opportunity to clean up the variable names as well.
I went over all the changes to ensure my find-and-replace didn't have
any undesired side-effects. I hope I didn't miss any, but if you end up
at this commit doing a git blame on a weirdly named variable, please
know that the change was unintentional.
llvm-svn: 353912
Summary:
This patch adds support of expression evaluation in a context of some object.
Consider the following example:
```
struct S {
int a = 11;
int b = 12;
};
int main() {
S s;
int a = 1;
int b = 2;
// We have stopped here
return 0;
}
```
This patch allows to do something like that:
```
lldb.frame.FindVariable("s").EvaluateExpression("a + b")
```
and the result will be `33` (not `3`) because fields `a` and `b` of `s` will be
used (not locals `a` and `b`).
This is achieved by replacing of `this` type and object for the expression. This
has some limitations: an expression can be evaluated only for values located in
the debuggee process memory (they must have an address of `eAddressTypeLoad`
type).
Reviewers: teemperor, clayborg, jingham, zturner, labath, davide, spyffe, serge-sans-paille
Reviewed By: jingham
Subscribers: abidh, lldb-commits, leonid.mashinskiy
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55318
llvm-svn: 353149
Summary:
When we are creating a ClassTemplateSpecializationDecl in ParseTypeFromDWARF(...) we are not handling the case where variadic pack is empty in the specialization. This patch handles that case and adds a test to prevent future regressions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57363
llvm-svn: 352677
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
This patch changes the behavior when printing C++ function references:
where we previously would get a <could not determine size>, there is
now a <no summary available>. It's not clear to me whether this is a
bug or an omission, but it's one step further than LLDB previously
got.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56798
llvm-svn: 351376
The code in LLDB assumes that CompilerType and friends use the size 0
as a sentinel value to signal an error. This works for C++, where no
zero-sized type exists, but in many other programming languages
(including I believe C) types of size zero are possible and even
common. This is a particular pain point in swift-lldb, where extra
code exists to double-check that a type is *really* of size zero and
not an error at various locations.
To remedy this situation, this patch starts by converting
CompilerType::getBitSize() and getByteSize() to return an optional
result. To avoid wasting space, I hand-rolled my own optional data
type assuming that no type is larger than what fits into 63
bits. Follow-up patches would make similar changes to the ValueObject
hierarchy.
rdar://problem/47178964
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56688
llvm-svn: 351214
Using compare is verbose, bug prone and potentially inefficient (because
of early termination). Replace relevant call sites with the (in)equality
operator.
llvm-svn: 349972
The first one allows us to add an enumerator to an enum if we
already have an APSInt, since ultimately the implementation just
constructs one anyway. The second is just a general utility
function to covert a CompilerType to a clang::TagDecl.
llvm-svn: 349360
This patch simplifies boolean expressions acorss LLDB. It was generated
using clang-tidy with the following command:
run-clang-tidy.py -checks='-*,readability-simplify-boolean-expr' -format -fix $PWD
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55584
llvm-svn: 349215
This patch adds support for parsing and evaluating local variables.
using the native pdb plugin.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55575
llvm-svn: 349067
Previously CreateParameterDeclaration was always using the translation
unit DeclContext. We would later go and add parameters to the
FunctionDecl, but internally clang makes a copy when you do this, and
we'd end up with ParmVarDecl's at the global scope as well as in the
function scope.
This fixes the issue. It's hard to say whether this will introduce
a behavioral change in name lookup, but I know there have been several
hacks introduced in previous years to deal with collisions between
various types of variables, so there's a chance that this patch could
obviate one of those hacks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55571
llvm-svn: 348941
Summary:
This change adds eLanguageTypeDylan to the set of languages supported
by ClangASTContext. Debug info generated by the Open Dylan compiler's
LLVM back-end was designed to be compatible with C debug info.
Patch by Peter Housel.
Reviewers: clayborg
Reviewed By: clayborg
Subscribers: brucem, lldb-commits, aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54886
llvm-svn: 347637
This patch processes the case of retrieving a virtual base when the object is
already read from the debuggee memory.
To achieve that ValueObject::GetCPPVTableAddress was removed and was
reimplemented in ClangASTContext (because access to the process is needed to
retrieve the VTable pointer in general, and because this is the only place that
used old version of ValueObject::GetCPPVTableAddress).
This patch allows to use real object's VTable instead of searching virtual bases
by offsets restored by MicrosoftRecordLayoutBuilder. PDB has no enough info to
restore VBase offsets properly, so we have to read real VTable instead.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53506
llvm-svn: 346669
This patch removes the comments grouping header includes. They were
added after running IWYU over the LLDB codebase. However they add little
value, are often outdates and burdensome to maintain.
llvm-svn: 346626
The warning was introduced by r346392, which introduces new builtin
types (to support cl_intel_device_side_avc_motion_estimation OpenCL
extension).
Note that this patch only inserts empty cases to silence the warning and
unblock our integrate, does not aim to add support for the new types in
lldb.
llvm-svn: 346441
Clang recently improved its DWARF support for C VLA types. The DWARF
now looks like this:
0x00000051: DW_TAG_variable [4]
DW_AT_location( fbreg -32 )
DW_AT_name( "__vla_expr" )
DW_AT_type( {0x000000d3} ( long unsigned int ) )
DW_AT_artificial( true )
...
0x000000da: DW_TAG_array_type [10] *
DW_AT_type( {0x000000cc} ( int ) )
0x000000df: DW_TAG_subrange_type [11]
DW_AT_type( {0x000000e9} ( __ARRAY_SIZE_TYPE__ ) )
DW_AT_count( {0x00000051} )
Without this patch LLDB will naively interpret the DIE offset 0x51 as
the static size of the array, which is clearly wrong. This patch
extends ValueObject::GetNumChildren to query the dynamic properties of
incomplete array types.
See the testcase for an example:
4 int foo(int a) {
5 int vla[a];
6 for (int i = 0; i < a; ++i)
7 vla[i] = i;
8
-> 9 pause(); // break here
10 return vla[a-1];
11 }
(lldb) fr v vla
(int []) vla = ([0] = 0, [1] = 1, [2] = 2, [3] = 3)
(lldb) quit
rdar://problem/21814005
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53530
llvm-svn: 346165
This is useful for investigating the clang ast as you reconstruct
it via by parsing debug info. It can also be used to write tests
against.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54072
llvm-svn: 346149
We haven't supported compiling ObjC1 for a long time (and never will again), so
there isn't any reason to keep these separate. This patch replaces
LangOpts::ObjC1 and LangOpts::ObjC2 with LangOpts::ObjC.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53547
llvm-svn: 345637
We currently had a 2-step process where we had to call
SetBaseClassesForType and DeleteBaseClasses. Every single caller
followed this exact 2-step process, and there was manual memory
management going on with raw pointers. We can do better than this
by storing a vector of unique_ptrs and passing this around.
This makes for a cleaner API, and we only need to call one method
so there is no possibility of a user forgetting to call
DeleteBaseClassSpecifiers.
In addition to this, it also makes for a *simpler* API. Part of
why I wanted to do this is because when I was implementing the native
PDB interface I had to spend some time understanding exactly what I
was deleting and why. ClangAST has significant mental overhead
associated with it, and reducing the API surface can go along
way to making it simpler for people to understand.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53590
llvm-svn: 345312
Gauthier Harnisch