OSchip
/
llvm-project
mirror of https://github.com/THU-DSP-LAB/llvm-project.git
13
0
Fork 6
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

[X86][SSE] Remove PSHUFLW/PSHUFHW combineRedundantHalfShuffle combine 

This can be achieved more generally by combineX86ShufflesRecursively and was causing a fuzz test failure found by Mikael Holmén.

llvm-svn: 342642
This commit is contained in:
Simon Pilgrim 2018-09-20 12:11:38 +00:00
parent 96ed75d066
commit 46c1dcb1af
1 changed files with 0 additions and 71 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

71
llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
View File

@ -31021,74 +31021,6 @@ combineRedundantDWordShuffle(SDValue N, MutableArrayRef<int> Mask,
return V;
}
/// Search for a combinable shuffle across a chain ending in pshuflw or
/// pshufhw.
///
/// We walk up the chain, skipping shuffles of the other half and looking
/// through shuffles which switch halves trying to find a shuffle of the same
/// pair of dwords.
static bool combineRedundantHalfShuffle(SDValue N, MutableArrayRef<int> Mask,
SelectionDAG &DAG,
TargetLowering::DAGCombinerInfo &DCI) {
assert(
(N.getOpcode() == X86ISD::PSHUFLW || N.getOpcode() == X86ISD::PSHUFHW) &&
"Called with something other than an x86 128-bit half shuffle!");
SDLoc DL(N);
unsigned CombineOpcode = N.getOpcode();
// Walk up a single-use chain looking for a combinable shuffle.
SDValue V = N.getOperand(0);
for (; V.hasOneUse(); V = V.getOperand(0)) {
switch (V.getOpcode()) {
default:
return false; // Nothing combined!
case ISD::BITCAST:
// Skip bitcasts as we always know the type for the target specific
// instructions.
continue;
case X86ISD::PSHUFLW:
case X86ISD::PSHUFHW:
if (V.getOpcode() == CombineOpcode)
break;
// Other-half shuffles are no-ops.
continue;
}
// Break out of the loop if we break out of the switch.
break;
}
if (!V.hasOneUse())
// We fell out of the loop without finding a viable combining instruction.
return false;
// Combine away the bottom node as its shuffle will be accumulated into
// a preceding shuffle.
DCI.CombineTo(N.getNode(), N.getOperand(0), /*AddTo*/ true);
// Record the old value.
SDValue Old = V;
// Merge this node's mask and our incoming mask (adjusted to account for all
// the pshufd instructions encountered).
SmallVector<int, 4> VMask = getPSHUFShuffleMask(V);
for (int &M : Mask)
M = VMask[M];
V = DAG.getNode(V.getOpcode(), DL, MVT::v8i16, V.getOperand(0),
getV4X86ShuffleImm8ForMask(Mask, DL, DAG));
// Check that the shuffles didn't cancel each other out. If not, we need to
// combine to the new one.
if (Old != V)
// Replace the combinable shuffle with the combined one, updating all users
// so that we re-evaluate the chain here.
DCI.CombineTo(Old.getNode(), V, /*AddTo*/ true);
return true;
}
/// Try to combine x86 target specific shuffles.
static SDValue combineTargetShuffle(SDValue N, SelectionDAG &DAG,
TargetLowering::DAGCombinerInfo &DCI,
@ -31320,9 +31252,6 @@ static SDValue combineTargetShuffle(SDValue N, SelectionDAG &DAG,
case X86ISD::PSHUFHW:
assert(VT.getVectorElementType() == MVT::i16 && "Bad word shuffle type!");
if (combineRedundantHalfShuffle(N, Mask, DAG, DCI))
return SDValue(); // We combined away this shuffle, so we're done.
// See if this reduces to a PSHUFD which is no more expensive and can
// combine with more operations. Note that it has to at least flip the
// dwords as otherwise it would have been removed as a no-op.