r139454 activates an assert in a case where we were doing the right thing anyway. Make that explicit, and un-XFAIL the testcase.
llvm-svn: 139458
This commit is contained in:
parent
c41773ab6a
commit
7f50e00203
|
|
@ -4615,8 +4615,16 @@ static SDValue getShuffleScalarElt(SDNode *N, int Index, SelectionDAG &DAG,
|
||||||
DecodeVPERM2F128Mask(VT, cast<ConstantSDNode>(ImmN)->getZExtValue(),
|
DecodeVPERM2F128Mask(VT, cast<ConstantSDNode>(ImmN)->getZExtValue(),
|
||||||
ShuffleMask);
|
ShuffleMask);
|
||||||
break;
|
break;
|
||||||
|
case X86ISD::MOVDDUP:
|
||||||
|
case X86ISD::MOVLHPD:
|
||||||
|
case X86ISD::MOVLPD:
|
||||||
|
case X86ISD::MOVLPS:
|
||||||
|
case X86ISD::MOVSHDUP:
|
||||||
|
case X86ISD::MOVSLDUP:
|
||||||
|
case X86ISD::PALIGN:
|
||||||
|
return SDValue(); // Not yet implemented.
|
||||||
default:
|
default:
|
||||||
assert(0 && "not implemented for target shuffle node");
|
assert(0 && "unknown target shuffle node");
|
||||||
return SDValue();
|
return SDValue();
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue