There's many instances in clang tidy checks where owning strings are used when we already have a stable string from the options, so using a StringRef makes much more sense.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124341
modernize-loop-convert checks and fixes when a loop that iterates over the
elements of a container can be rewritten from a for(...; ...; ...) style into
the "new" C++11 for-range format. For that, it needs to parse the elements of
that loop, like its init-statement, such as ItType it = cont.begin().
modernize-loop-convert checks whether the loop variable is initialized by a
begin() member function.
When an iterator is initialized with a conversion operator (e.g. for
(const_iterator it = non_const_container.begin(); ...), attempts to retrieve the
name of the initializer expression resulted in an assert, as conversion
operators don't have a valid IdentifierInfo.
I fixed this by making digThroughConstructors dig through conversion operators
as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113201
Enables support for transforming loops of the form
```
for (auto I = Cont.rbegin(), E = Cont.rend(); I != E;++I)
```
This is done automatically in C++20 mode using `std::ranges::reverse_view` but there are options to specify a different function to reverse iterator over a container.
This is the first step, down the line I'd like to possibly extend this support for array based loops
```
for (unsigned I = Arr.size() - 1;I >=0;--I) Arr[I]...
```
Currently if you pass a reversing function with no header in the options it will just assume that the function exists, however as we have the ASTContext it may be as wise to check before applying, or at least lower the confidence level if we can't find it.
Reviewed By: alexfh
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82089
Summary:
This feature was only used in two places, but contributed a non-trivial
amount to the complexity of RecursiveASTVisitor, and was buggy (see my
recent patches where I was fixing the bugs that I noticed). I don't
think the convenience benefit of this feature is worth the complexity.
Besides complexity, another issue with the current state of
RecursiveASTVisitor is the non-uniformity in how it handles different
AST nodes. All AST nodes follow a regular pattern, but operators are
special -- and this special behavior not documented. Correct usage of
RecursiveASTVisitor relies on shadowing member functions with specific
names and signatures. Near misses don't cause any compile-time errors,
incorrectly named or typed methods are just silently ignored. Therefore,
predictability of RecursiveASTVisitor API is quite important.
This change reduces the size of the `clang` binary by 38 KB (0.2%) in
release mode, and by 7 MB (0.3%) in debug mode. The `clang-tidy` binary
is reduced by 205 KB (0.3%) in release mode, and by 5 MB (0.4%) in debug
mode. I don't think these code size improvements are significant enough
to justify this change on its own (for me, the primary motivation is
reducing code complexity), but they I think are a nice side-effect.
Reviewers: rsmith, sammccall, ymandel, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: rsmith, sammccall, ymandel, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82921
Summary:
We've been running doxygen with the autobrief option for a couple of
years now. This makes the \brief markers into our comments
redundant. Since they are a visual distraction and we don't want to
encourage more \brief markers in new code either, this patch removes
them all.
Patch produced by
for i in $(git grep -l '\\brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\\brief //g' $i & done
[This is analogous to LLVM r331272 and CFE r331834]
Subscribers: srhines, nemanjai, javed.absar, kbarton, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, jfb, kadircet, jsji, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66578
llvm-svn: 369643
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary:
Depends on D23204.
This is intended to be submitted immediately after D23204 lands.
Reviewers: jdennett, alexfh
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23543
llvm-svn: 278934
Summary:
I recently found that the variable naming wasn't working as expected with containers that are data members. The new index always received the name "Elem" (or equivalent) regardless of the container's name.
The check was assuming that the container's declaration was a VarDecl, which cannot be converted to a FieldDecl (a data member), and then it could never retrieve its name.
This also fixes some cases where the check failed to find the container at all (so it didn't do any fix) because of the same reason.
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits, alexfh
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14289
llvm-svn: 251943
Summary: Add an option to specify wich style must be followed when choosing the new index name.
Reviewers: alexfh
Subscribers: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13052
llvm-svn: 248517
Summary:
1. Avoid converting loops that iterate over the size of a container and don't use its elements, as this would result in an unused-result warning.
2. Never capture the elements by value on lambdas, thus avoiding doing unnecessary copies and errors with non-copyable types.
3. The 'const auto &' instead of 'auto &' substitution on const containers now works on arrays and pseudoarrays as well.
4. The error about multiple replacements in the same macro call is now documented in the tests (not solved though).
5. Due to [1], I had to add a dummy usage of the range element (like "(void) *It;" or similars) on the tests that had empty loops.
6. I removed the braces from the CHECK comments. I think that there is no need for them, and they confuse vim.
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: alexfh, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12734
llvm-svn: 247399
Summary: The InitListExpr subtree is visited twice, this caused the check to do multiple replacements. Added a set to avoid it.
Reviewers: klimek, alexfh
Subscribers: cfe-commits, alexfh
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12631
llvm-svn: 246879
Summary: Ensure that the alias has the same type than the loop variable. Now it works with lambda captures.
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: alexfh, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12597
llvm-svn: 246762
Summary: Reduced the amount of wrong conversions of this check.
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: alexfh, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12530
llvm-svn: 246550
Nathan James