The `readability-braces-around-statements` check tries to look at the
closing parens of the if condition to determine where to insert braces,
however, "consteval if" statements don't have a condition, and always
have braces regardless, so the skip can be checked.
The `readability-simplify-boolean-expr` check looks at the condition
of the if statement to determine what could be simplified, but as
"consteval if" statements do not have a condition that could be
simplified, they can also be skipped here.
There may still be more checks that try to look at the conditions of
`if`s that aren't included here
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/57568
Reviewed By: njames93, aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133413
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50069
When clang-tidy sees:
```
if (true) [[unlikely]] {
...
}
```
It thinks the braces are missing and add them again.
```
if (true) { [[unlikely]] {
...
}
}
```
This revision aims to prevent that incorrect code generation
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105479
Summary: fixes [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32203 | readability-braces-around-statements broken for if constexpr]] and [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44229 | bugprone-branch-clone false positive with template functions and constexpr ]] by disabling the relevant checks on if constexpr statements while inside an instantiated template. This is due to how the else branch of an if constexpr statement is folded away to a null statement if the condition evaluates to false
Reviewers: alexfh, hokein, aaron.ballman, xazax.hun
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, xazax.hun
Subscribers: rnkovacs, JonasToth, Jim, lebedev.ri, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71980
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary:
Single-line if statements cause a false positive when the last token in the conditional statement is a char constant:
```
if (condition)
return 'a';
```
For some reason `findEndLocation` seems to skips too many (vertical) whitespaces in this case. The same problem already occured with string literals (https://reviews.llvm.org/D25558), and was fixed by adding a special check for this very case. I just extended the condition to also include char constants. No idea what really causes the issue though.
Reviewers: alexfh
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Patch by Florian Gross!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33354
llvm-svn: 303551
Summary:
This fixes a false-positive e.g. when string literals are returned from if statement.
This patch includes as well a small fix to includes and renames of the test suite that collided with the name of the check.
Reviewers: alexfh, hokein
Subscribers: hokein
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25558
llvm-svn: 284212
Summary:
The check will trigger a assert failure("CondEndLoc.isValid") when
checking the IfStmt whose condition expression is not parsed.
In this case, we should ignore that.
Reviewers: alexfh
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17069
llvm-svn: 260505
Summary:
Force braces on the else branch if they are being added to the if branch.
This ensures consistency in the transformed code.
Reviewers: alexfh
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8708
llvm-svn: 233697
Summary:
Some of the misc checks belong to readability/. I'm moving them there
without changing check names for now. As the next step, I want to register some
of these checks in the google and llvm modules with suitable settings (e.g.
BracesAroundStatementsCheck). I'm not sure if we want to create a "readability"
module, probably not.
Reviewers: djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
Subscribers: curdeius, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5792
llvm-svn: 219786
Emilia Dreamer