This patch mechanically replaces None with std::nullopt where the
compiler would warn if None were deprecated. The intent is to reduce
the amount of manual work required in migrating from Optional to
std::optional.
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
This is less plumbing and clutter in ClangdMain.cpp.
Having --check-lines imply completion was just about minimizing plumbing
I think, so make that explicit.
misc-const-correctness is so catastrophically slow that we need to block it
from running. But we need a way to detect this without breaking users first.
This is part of a plan to run only fast checks by default.
More details in https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/1337
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136082
This gives CommandMangler access to other fields of
tooling::CompileCommand as well, e.g. Directory.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133756
That way when looking at logs it's clear whether diagnostics are a
result of compile flags mismatch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130228
I am working on support for forwarding parameter names in make_unique-like functions, first for inlay hints, later maybe for signature help.
For that to work generically, I'd like to parse all of these functions in the preamble. Not sure how this impacts performance on large codebases though.
Reviewed By: sammccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124688
With the addition of inlay hints to clangd, it would be useful to output them during verbose `clangd --check`.
This patch adds an output step for inlay hints and unifies the way `--check-lines` are passed around
Reviewed By: nridge
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124344
In --check mode we do not run code completion because it is too slow,
especially on larger files. With the introducation of --check-lines we
can narrow down the scope and thus we can afford to do code completion.
We vlog() the top completion result, but that's not really the point.
The most value will come from being able to reproduce crashes that occur
during code completion and require preamble build or index (and thus are
more difficult to reproduce with -code-complete-at).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103538
Tweaks like DefineOutline depend on FS to be set at `apply()` time.
After https://reviews.llvm.org/D93978, tweaks run from Check tool lost
access to FS. This makes the available to apply() once again.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102519
Cross file tweaks can now use the dirty buffer contents easily when performing cross file effects.
This can be noted on the DefineOutline tweak, now working when the target file is unsaved
Reviewed By: sammccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93978
First patch to enable diagnostic fix generation through modules. The
workflow will look like:
- ASTWorker letting modules know about diagnostics while building AST,
modules can read clang::Diagnostic and mutate clangd::Diagnostic through
that hook.
- Modules can implement and expose tweaks to fix diagnostics or act as
general refactorings.
- Tweak::Selection will contain information about the diagnostic
associated with the codeAction request to enable modules to fail their
diagnostic fixing tweakson prepare if need be.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98498
This will allow us to add code completion, which is too expensive at
every token, to --check too.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98970
Implement initial support for pull-based diagnostics in ClangdServer.
This is planned for LSP 3.17, and initial proposal is in
d15eb0671e/protocol/src/common/proposed.diagnostic.ts (L111).
We chose to serve the requests only when clangd has a fresh preamble
available. In case of a stale preamble we just drop the request on the
floor.
This patch doesn't plumb this to LSP layer yet, as pullDiags is still a
proposal with only an implementation in vscode.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98623
This enables unifying command line flags with config options in clangd
internals. This patch changes behaviour in 2 places:
- BackgroundIndex was previously disabled when -remote-index was
provided. After this patch, it will be enabled but all files will have
bkgindex policy set to Skip.
- -index-file was loaded at startup (at least load was initiated), now
the load will happen through ProjectAwareIndex with first index query.
Unfortunately this doesn't simplify any options initially, as
- CompileCommandsDir is also used by clangd --check workflow, which
doesn't use configs.
- EnableBackgroundIndex option controls whether the component will be
created at all, which implies creation of extra threads registering a
listener for compilation database discoveries.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98029
When querying the CDB, we stat the underlying file to check it hasn't changed.
We don't do this every time, but only if we didn't check within 5 seconds.
This behavior only exists for compile_commands.json and compile_flags.txt.
The CDB plugin system doesn't expose enough information to handle others.
Slight behavior change: we now only look for `build/compile_commands.json`
rather than trying every CDB strategy under `build` subdirectories.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92663
Added some new ClangTidyOptionsProvider like classes designed for clangd work flow.
These providers are designed to source the options on the worker thread but in a thread safe manner.
This is done through making the options getter take a pointer to the filesystem used by the worker thread which natuarally is from a ThreadsafeFS.
Internal caching in the providers is also guarded.
The providers don't inherit from `ClangTidyOptionsProvider` instead they share a base class which is able to create a provider for the `ClangTidyContext` using a specific FileSystem.
This approach means one provider can be used for multiple contexts even though `ClangTidyContext` owns its provider.
Depends on D90531
Reviewed By: sammccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91029
This is a tool to simply parse a file as clangd would, and run some
common features (code actions, go-to-definition, hover) in an attempt to
trigger or reproduce crashes, error diagnostics, etc.
This is easier and more predictable than loading the file in clangd, because:
- there's no editor/plugin variation to worry about
- there's no accidental variation of user behavior or other extraneous requests
- we trigger features at every token, rather than guessing
- everything is synchronoous, logs are easier to reason about
- it's easier to (get users to) capture logs when running on the command-line
This is a fairly lightweight variant of this idea.
We could do a lot more with it, and maybe we should.
But I can't in the near future, and experience will tell us if we made
the right tradeoffs and if it's worth investing further.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88338
Kazu Hirata