This patch mechanically replaces None with std::nullopt where the
compiler would warn if None were deprecated. The intent is to reduce
the amount of manual work required in migrating from Optional to
std::optional.
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
Adds support for NamespaceDecl to inform if its part of a nested namespace.
This flag only corresponds to the inner namespaces in a nested namespace declaration.
In this example:
namespace <X>::<Y>::<Z> {}
Only <Y> and <Z> will be classified as nested.
This flag isn't meant for assisting in building the AST, more for static analysis and refactorings.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90568
We were crashing trying to convert a GlobalDecl from a
CXXConstructorDecl. Instead of trying to do that conversion, just pass
down the original GlobalDecl.
I think we could actually compute the correct constructor/destructor
kind from the context, given the way Microsoft mangling works, but it's
simpler to just pass through the correct constructor/destructor kind.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136776
Removes a bunch of obsolete methods in favor of a single one returning
an ArrayRef of TemplateArgument.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136602
Clang is generating different mangled names for the same lambda
function in slightly changed builds (like with non-related
source/Macro change). This is due to the fact that clang uses a
cross-translation-unit sequential string "$_<n>" in lambda's
mangled name. Here, "n" is the AnonStructIds field in MangleContext.
Different mangled names for a unchanged function is undesirable:
it makes perf comparison harder, and can cause some unnecessary
profile mismatch in SampleFDO.
This patch makes mangled name for lambda functions more stable
by changing AnonStructIds to a per-function based seq number if the
DeclContext is a function.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136397
Adds
* `__add_lvalue_reference`
* `__add_pointer`
* `__add_rvalue_reference`
* `__decay`
* `__make_signed`
* `__make_unsigned`
* `__remove_all_extents`
* `__remove_extent`
* `__remove_const`
* `__remove_volatile`
* `__remove_cv`
* `__remove_pointer`
* `__remove_reference`
* `__remove_cvref`
These are all compiler built-in equivalents of the unary type traits
found in [[meta.trans]][1]. The compiler already has all of the
information it needs to answer these transformations, so we can skip
needing to make partial specialisations in standard library
implementations (we already do this for a lot of the query traits). This
will hopefully improve compile times, as we won't need use as much
memory in such a base part of the standard library.
[1]: http://wg21.link/meta.trans
Co-authored-by: zoecarver
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116203
Adds
* `__add_lvalue_reference`
* `__add_pointer`
* `__add_rvalue_reference`
* `__decay`
* `__make_signed`
* `__make_unsigned`
* `__remove_all_extents`
* `__remove_extent`
* `__remove_const`
* `__remove_volatile`
* `__remove_cv`
* `__remove_pointer`
* `__remove_reference`
* `__remove_cvref`
These are all compiler built-in equivalents of the unary type traits
found in [[meta.trans]][1]. The compiler already has all of the
information it needs to answer these transformations, so we can skip
needing to make partial specialisations in standard library
implementations (we already do this for a lot of the query traits). This
will hopefully improve compile times, as we won't need use as much
memory in such a base part of the standard library.
[1]: http://wg21.link/meta.trans
Co-authored-by: zoecarver
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116203
C++20 modules require emission of an initializer function, which is
called by importers of the module. This implements the mangling for
that function. It is the one place the ABI exposes partition names in
symbols -- but fortunately only needed by other TUs of that same module.
Reviewed By: bruno
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122741
Allows emitting define amdgpu_kernel void @func() IR from C or C++.
This replaces the current workflow which is to write a stub in opencl that
calls an external C function implemented in C++ combined through llvm-link.
Calling the resulting function still requires a manual implementation of the
ABI from the host side. The primary application is for more rapid debugging
of the amdgpu backend by permuting a C or C++ test file instead of manually
updating an IR file.
Implementation closely follows D54425. Non-amd reviewers from there.
Reviewed By: yaxunl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125970
CUDA/HIP needs to mangle for aux target. When mangling for aux target,
the mangler should use mangling number for aux target. Previously
in https://reviews.llvm.org/D122734 a state was introduced in
ASTContext to let the mangler get mangling number for aux target
from ASTContext. This patch removes that state from ASTConext
and add an IsAux member to MangleContext to indicate that
the mangle context is for aux target. This reflects the reality that
the mangle context is created for mangling aux target and makes
ASTContext cleaner.
Reviewed by: Artem Belevich, Reid Kleckner
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124842
The Itanium C++ ABI says prefixes are substitutable. For most prefixes
we already handle this: the manglePrefix(const DeclContext *, bool) and
manglePrefix(QualType) overloads explicitly handles substitutions or
defer to functions that handle substitutions on their behalf. The
manglePrefix(NestedNameSpecifier *) overload, however, is different and
handles some cases implicitly, but not all. The Identifier case was not
handled; this change adds handling for it, as well as a test case.
Reviewed By: erichkeane
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122663
This is the template version of https://reviews.llvm.org/D114251.
This patch introduces a new template name kind (UsingTemplateName). The
UsingTemplateName stores the found using-shadow decl (and underlying
template can be retrieved from the using-shadow decl). With the new
template name, we can be able to find the using decl that a template
typeloc (e.g. TemplateSpecializationTypeLoc) found its underlying template,
which is useful for tooling use cases (include cleaner etc).
This patch merely focuses on adding the node to the AST.
Next steps:
- support using-decl in qualified template name;
- update the clangd and other tools to use this new node;
- add ast matchers for matching different kinds of template names;
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123127
It breaks arm build, there is no free bit for the extra
UsingShadowDecl in TemplateName::StorageType.
Reverting it to build the buildbot back until we comeup with a fix.
This reverts commit 5a5be4044f.
This is the template version of https://reviews.llvm.org/D114251.
This patch introduces a new template name kind (UsingTemplateName). The
UsingTemplateName stores the found using-shadow decl (and underlying
template can be retrieved from the using-shadow decl). With the new
template name, we can be able to find the using decl that a template
typeloc (e.g. TemplateSpecializationTypeLoc) found its underlying template,
which is useful for tooling use cases (include cleaner etc).
This patch merely focuses on adding the node to the AST.
Next steps:
- support using-decl in qualified template name;
- update the clangd and other tools to use this new node;
- add ast matchers for matching different kinds of template names;
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123127
AND the followups that fixed builds.
I attempted to get 'cute' and use llvm-cxxfilt to make the test look
nicer, but apparently some of the bots have a version of llvm-cxxfilt
that is not the in-tree one, so it fails to properly demangle the stuff.
I've disabled this "RUN" line.
This reverts commit 50186b63d1.
As reported in https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54588
and discussed in https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi/cxx-abi/issues/139
We are supposed to do a DFS, pre-order, decl-order search for a name for
the union in this case. Prevoiusly we crashed because the IdentiferInfo
pointer was nullptr, so this makes sure we have a name in the cases
described by the ABI.
I added an llvm-unreachable to cover an unexpected case at the end of
the new function with information/reference to the ABI in case we come
up with some way to get back to here.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122820
Implement a demangleable strong ownership symbol mangling.
* The original module symbol mangling scheme turned out to be
undemangleable.
* The hoped-for C++17 compatibility of weak ownership turns out to be
fragile
* C++20 now has better ways of controlling C++17 compatibility
The issue is captured on the ABI list at:
https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi/cxx-abi/issues/134
GCC implements this new mangling.
The old mangling is unceremoniously dropped. No backwards
compatibility, no deprectated old-mangling flag. It was always
labelled experimental. (Old and new manglings cannot be confused.)
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122256
Current ASTContext.getAttributedType() takes attribute kind,
ModifiedType and EquivType as the hash to decide whether an AST node
has been generated or note. But this is not enough for btf_type_tag
as the attribute might have the same ModifiedType and EquivType, but
still have different string associated with attribute.
For example, for a data structure like below,
struct map_value {
int __attribute__((btf_type_tag("tag1"))) __attribute__((btf_type_tag("tag3"))) *a;
int __attribute__((btf_type_tag("tag2"))) __attribute__((btf_type_tag("tag4"))) *b;
};
The current ASTContext.getAttributedType() will produce
an AST similar to below:
struct map_value {
int __attribute__((btf_type_tag("tag1"))) __attribute__((btf_type_tag("tag3"))) *a;
int __attribute__((btf_type_tag("tag1"))) __attribute__((btf_type_tag("tag3"))) *b;
};
and this is incorrect.
It is very difficult to use the current AttributedType as it is hard to
get the tag information. To fix the problem, this patch introduced
BTFTagAttributedType which is similar to AttributedType
in many ways but with an additional BTFTypeTagAttr. The tag itself can
be retrieved with BTFTypeTagAttr.
With the new BTFTagAttributed type, the debuginfo code can be greatly
simplified compared to previous TypeLoc based approach.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120296
The existing module symbol mangling scheme turns out to be
undemangleable. It is also desirable to switch to the
strong-ownership model as the hoped-for C++17 compatibility turns out
to be fragile, and we also now have a better way of controlling that.
The issue is captured on the ABI list at:
https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi/cxx-abi/issues/134
A document describing the issues and new mangling is at:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qQjqptzOFT_lfXH8L6-iD9nCRi34wjft/view
This patch is the code-generation part. I have a demangler too, but
that patch is based on some to-be-landed refactoring of the demangler.
The old mangling is unceremoniously dropped. No backwards
compatibility, no deprectated old-mangling flag. It was always
labelled experimental. (Old and new manglings cannot be confused.)
Reviewed By: ChuanqiXu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118352
In post-commit feedback on D104830 Jessica Clarke pointed out that
unconditionally adding __va_list to the std namespace caused namespace
debug info to be emitted in C, which is not only inappropriate but
turned out to confuse the dtrace tool. Therefore, move __va_list back
to std only in C++ so that the correct debug info is generated. We
also considered moving __va_list to the top level unconditionally
but this would contradict the specification and be visible to AST
matchers and such, so make it conditional on the language mode.
To avoid breaking name mangling for __va_list, teach the Itanium
name mangler to always mangle it as if it were in the std namespace
when targeting ARM architectures. This logic is not needed for the
Microsoft name mangler because Microsoft platforms define va_list as
a typedef of char *.
Depends on D116773
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116774
In an upcoming change we are going to need to access mangler state
from the getEffectiveDeclContext() function. Therefore, make it a
member function of ItaniumMangleContextImpl. Any callers that are
not currently members of ItaniumMangleContextImpl or CXXNameMangler
are made members of one or the other depending on where they are
called from.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116773
The Itanium mangler constructors use both NSDMI and explicit member
construction for default values. This is confusing.
*) Use NSDMIs wherever possible
*) Use forwarding ctor for the nesting case with an
llvm::raw_null_ostream (and explicitly set NullOut flag in that ctor).
*) Copy the ModuleSubstitutions. This is a bug with no effect in the
current mangling, but not in the newer mangling.
Reviewed By: ChuanqiXu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119550
The Itanium mangler uses IgnoreLinkageSpecDecls to strip linkage spec
contexts. It doesn't do this consistently, but there is no need for
it to do it at all. getEffectiveDeclContext never returns a linkage
spec, as it either recurses, uses getRedeclContext (which itself
removes the specs), or gets the decl context of non-namespace entities.
This patch removes the function and all calls to it. For safety I add
a couple of asserts to make sure we never get them.
Reviewed By: ChuanqiXu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119748
In preparing for module mangling changes I noticed some issues with
the way we check for std::basic_string instantiations and friends.
*) there's a single routine for std::basic_{i,o,io}stream but it is
templatized on the length of the name. Really? just use a
StringRef, rather than clone the entire routine just for
'basic_iostream'.
*) We have a helper routine to check for char type, and call it from
several places. But given all the instantiations are of the form
TPL<char, Other<char> ...> we could just check the first arg is char
and the later templated args are instantiating that same type. A
simpler type comparison.
*) Because basic_string has a third allocator parameter, it is open
coded, which I found a little confusing. But otherwise it's exactly
the same pattern as the iostream ones. Just tell that checker about
whether there's an expected allocator argument.[*]
*) We may as well return in each block of mangleStandardSubstitution
once we determine it is not one of the entities of interest -- it
certainly cannot be one of the other kinds of entities.
FWIW this shaves about 500 bytes off the executable.
[*] I suppose we could also have this routine a tri-value, with one to
indicat 'it is this name, but it's not the one you're looking for', to
avoid later calls trying different names?
Reviewd By: ChuanqiXu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119333
In working on a module mangling problem I noticed a few cleanups to the mangler.
1) Use 'if (auto x = ...' idiom in a couple of places.
2) I noticed both 'isFileContext' and 'isNamespace || isTranslationUnit'
synonyms. Let's use the former.
3) The control flow in the seqId mangling was misordered. Let's channel Count
von Count. Also fix the inconsistent bracing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117799
This reverts commit cc56c66f27.
Fixed a bad assertion, the target of a UsingShadowDecl must not have
*local* qualifiers, but it can be a typedef whose underlying type is qualified.
Currently there's no way to find the UsingDecl that a typeloc found its
underlying type through. Compare to DeclRefExpr::getFoundDecl().
Design decisions:
- a sugar type, as there are many contexts this type of use may appear in
- UsingType is a leaf like TypedefType, the underlying type has no TypeLoc
- not unified with UnresolvedUsingType: a single name is appealing,
but being sometimes-sugar is often fiddly.
- not unified with TypedefType: the UsingShadowDecl is not a TypedefNameDecl or
even a TypeDecl, and users think of these differently.
- does not cover other rarer aliases like objc @compatibility_alias,
in order to be have a concrete API that's easy to understand.
- implicitly desugared by the hasDeclaration ASTMatcher, to avoid
breaking existing patterns and following the precedent of ElaboratedType.
Scope:
- This does not cover types associated with template names introduced by
using declarations. A future patch should introduce a sugar TemplateName
variant for this. (CTAD deduced types fall under this)
- There are enough AST matchers to fix the in-tree clang-tidy tests and
probably any other matchers, though more may be useful later.
Caveats:
- This changes a fairly common pattern in the AST people may depend on matching.
Previously, typeLoc(loc(recordType())) matched whether a struct was
referred to by its original scope or introduced via using-decl.
Now, the using-decl case is not matched, and needs a separate matcher.
This is similar to the case of typedefs but nevertheless both adds
complexity and breaks existing code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114251
WG14 adopted the _ExtInt feature from Clang for C23, but renamed the
type to be _BitInt. This patch does the vast majority of the work to
rename _ExtInt to _BitInt, which accounts for most of its size. The new
type is exposed in older C modes and all C++ modes as a conforming
extension. However, there are functional changes worth calling out:
* Deprecates _ExtInt with a fix-it to help users migrate to _BitInt.
* Updates the mangling for the type.
* Updates the documentation and adds a release note to warn users what
is going on.
* Adds new diagnostics for use of _BitInt to call out when it's used as
a Clang extension or as a pre-C23 compatibility concern.
* Adds new tests for the new diagnostic behaviors.
I want to call out the ABI break specifically. We do not believe that
this break will cause a significant imposition for early adopters of
the feature, and so this is being done as a full break. If it turns out
there are critical uses where recompilation is not an option for some
reason, we can consider using ABI tags to ease the transition.
[NFC] This patch fixes URLs containing "master". Old URLs were either broken or
redirecting to the new URL.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113186
Unfortunately I've not found a way to exercise this code that doesn't
crash elsewhere yet, due to unrelated bugs in how Sema incorrectly
instantiates lambdas in function template signatures.
Distinct lambda expressions are always considered non-equivalent, so two
token-for-token identical function declarations whose signatures involve
lambda-expressions declare distinct functions.
After significant problems in our downstream with the previous
implementation, the SYCL standard has opted to make using macros/etc to
change kernel-naming-lambdas in any way UB (even passively). As a
result, we are able to just emit the itanium mangling.
However, this DOES require a little work in the CXXABI, as the microsoft
and itanium mangler use different numbering schemes for lambdas. This
patch adds a pair of mangling contexts that use the normal 'itanium'
mangling strategy to fill in the "DeviceManglingNumber" used previously
by CUDA.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110281
Currently, we have no front-end type for ppc_fp128 type in IR. PowerPC
target generates ppc_fp128 type from long double now, but there's option
(-mabi=(ieee|ibm)longdouble) to control it and we're going to do
transition from IBM extended double-double ppc_fp128 to IEEE fp128 in
the future.
This patch adds type __ibm128 which always represents ppc_fp128 in IR,
as what GCC did for that type. Without this type in Clang, compilation
will fail if compiling against future version of libstdcxx (which uses
__ibm128 in headers).
Although all operations in backend for __ibm128 is done by software,
only PowerPC enables support for it.
There's something not implemented in this commit, which can be done in
future ones:
- Literal suffix for __ibm128 type. w/W is suitable as GCC documented.
- __attribute__((mode(IF))) should be for __ibm128.
- Complex __ibm128 type.
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93377
This change is intended as initial setup. The plan is to add
more semantic checks later. I plan to update the documentation
as more semantic checks are added (instead of documenting the
details up front). Most of the code closely mirrors that for
the Swift calling convention. Three places are marked as
[FIXME: swiftasynccc]; those will be addressed once the
corresponding convention is introduced in LLVM.
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95561
This fixes a gap in the `overloadable` attribute support (K&R declared
functions would get mangled symbol names, but that name wouldn't be
represented in the debug info linkage name field for the function) and
in -funique-internal-linkage-names (this came up in review discussion on
D98799) where K&R static declarations would not get the uniqued linkage
names.
The original version of this was reverted, and @rjmcall provided some
advice to architect a new solution. This is that solution.
This implements a builtin to provide a unique name that is stable across
compilations of this TU for the purposes of implementing the library
component of the unnamed kernel feature of SYCL. It does this by
running the Itanium mangler with a few modifications.
Because it is somewhat common to wrap non-kernel-related lambdas in
macros that aren't present on the device (such as for logging), this
uniquely generates an ID for all lambdas involved in the naming of a
kernel. It uses the lambda-mangling number to do this, except replaces
this with its own number (starting at 10000 for readabililty reasons)
for lambdas used to name a kernel.
Additionally, this implements itself as constexpr with a slight catch:
if a name would be invalidated by the use of this lambda in a later
kernel invocation, it is diagnosed as an error (see the Sema tests).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103112
Kazu Hirata