Currently, our boolean formulas (`BoolValue`) don't form a lattice, since they
have no Top element. This patch adds such an element, thereby "completing" the
built-in model of bools to be a proper semi-lattice. It still has infinite
height, which is its own problem, but that can be solved separately, through
widening and the like.
Patch 1 for Issue #56931.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135397
Previously we used to desugar implications and biconditionals into
equivalent CNF/DNF as soon as possible. However, this desugaring makes
debug output (Environment::dump()) less readable than it could be.
Therefore, it makes sense to keep the sugared representation of a
boolean formula, and desugar it in the solver.
Reviewed By: sgatev, xazax.hun, wyt
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130519
BooleanFormula::addClause has an invariant that a clause has no duplicated
literals. When the solver was desugaring a formula into CNF clauses, it
could construct a clause with such duplicated literals in two cases.
Reviewed By: sgatev, ymandel, xazax.hun
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130522
This reverts commit 19e21887eb. I
accidentally landed the non-final version of the patch that used
decomposition declarations (not yet usable in LLVM/Clang source).
A truth assignment to atomic boolean values which satisfy `Constraints` will be returned if found by the solver.
This gives us more information which can be helpful for debugging or constructing warning messages.
Reviewed By: hlopko, gribozavr2, sgatev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129180
This is part of the implementation of the dataflow analysis framework.
See "[RFC] A dataflow analysis framework for Clang AST" on cfe-dev.
Reviewed-by: ymandel, xazax.hun
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120289