This completes the implementation of P1091R3 and P1381R1.
This patch allow the capture of structured bindings
both for C++20+ and C++17, with extension/compat warning.
In addition, capturing an anonymous union member,
a bitfield, or a structured binding thereof now has a
better diagnostic.
We only support structured bindings - as opposed to other kinds
of structured statements/blocks. We still emit an error for those.
In addition, support for structured bindings capture is entirely disabled in
OpenMP mode as this needs more investigation - a specific diagnostic indicate the feature is not yet supported there.
Note that the rest of P1091R3 (static/thread_local structured bindings) was already implemented.
at the request of @shafik, i can confirm the correct behavior of lldb wit this change.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54300
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54300
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/52720
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122768
This completes the implementation of P1091R3 and P1381R1.
This patch allow the capture of structured bindings
both for C++20+ and C++17, with extension/compat warning.
In addition, capturing an anonymous union member,
a bitfield, or a structured binding thereof now has a
better diagnostic.
We only support structured bindings - as opposed to other kinds
of structured statements/blocks. We still emit an error for those.
In addition, support for structured bindings capture is entirely disabled in
OpenMP mode as this needs more investigation - a specific diagnostic indicate the feature is not yet supported there.
Note that the rest of P1091R3 (static/thread_local structured bindings) was already implemented.
at the request of @shafik, i can confirm the correct behavior of lldb wit this change.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54300
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54300
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/52720
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122768
Some of the predicates can't always be decided - for example when a type
definition isn't available. At the same time it's necessary to let
client code decide what to do about such cases - specifically we can't
just use true or false values as there are callees with
conflicting strategies how to handle this.
This is a speculative fix for PR47276.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88133
Corentin Jabot