I'm trying to remove unused options from the `Analyses.def` file, then
merge the rest of the useful options into the `AnalyzerOptions.def`.
Then make sure one can set these by an `-analyzer-config XXX=YYY` style
flag.
Then surface the `-analyzer-config` to the `clang` frontend;
After all of this, we can pursue the tablegen approach described
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-tablegen-clang-static-analyzer-engine-options-for-better-documentation/61488
In this patch, I'm proposing flag deprecations.
We should support deprecated analyzer flags for exactly one release. In
this case I'm planning to drop this flag in `clang-16`.
In the clang frontend, now we won't pass this option to the cc1
frontend, rather emit a warning diagnostic reminding the users about
this deprecated flag, which will be turned into error in clang-16.
Unfortunately, I had to remove all the tests referring to this flag,
causing a mass change. I've also added a test for checking this warning.
I've seen that `scan-build` also uses this flag, but I think we should
remove that part only after we turn this into a hard error.
Reviewed By: martong
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126215
I'm trying to remove unused options from the `Analyses.def` file, then
merge the rest of the useful options into the `AnalyzerOptions.def`.
Then make sure one can set these by an `-analyzer-config XXX=YYY` style
flag.
Then surface the `-analyzer-config` to the `clang` frontend;
After all of this, we can pursue the tablegen approach described
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-tablegen-clang-static-analyzer-engine-options-for-better-documentation/61488
In this patch, I'm proposing flag deprecations.
We should support deprecated analyzer flags for exactly one release. In
this case I'm planning to drop this flag in `clang-16`.
In the clang frontend, now we won't pass this option to the cc1
frontend, rather emit a warning diagnostic reminding the users about
this deprecated flag, which will be turned into error in clang-16.
Unfortunately, I had to remove all the tests referring to this flag,
causing a mass change. I've also added a test for checking this warning.
I've seen that `scan-build` also uses this flag, but I think we should
remove that part only after we turn this into a hard error.
Reviewed By: martong
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126215
Since there is no perfect way bind the non-zero value with the default binding, this patch only considers the case where buffer's offset is zero and the char value is 0. And according to the value for overwriting, decide how to update the string length.
Reviewers: dcoughlin, NoQ, xazax.hun, a.sidorin, george.karpenkov
Reviewed By: NoQ
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44934
llvm-svn: 332463
The checker used to crash when a mempcpy's length argument is symbolic. In this
case the cast from 'void *' to 'char *' failed because the respective
ElementRegion that represents cast is hard to add on top of the existing
ElementRegion that represents the offset to the last copied byte, while
preseving a sane memory region structure.
Additionally, a few test cases are added (to casts.c) which demonstrate problems
caused by existing sloppy work we do with multi-layer ElementRegions. If said
cast would be modeled properly in the future, these tests would need to be
taken into account.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38797
llvm-svn: 315742
Now that the libcpp implementations of these methods has a branch that doesn't call
memmove(), the analyzer needs to invalidate the destination for these methods explicitly.
rdar://problem/23575656
llvm-svn: 260043
Balazs Benics