Commit Graph

7 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Yuanfang Chen 27a972a699 Diagnose -Wunused-value based on CFG reachability
(This relands 59337263ab and makes sure comma operator
 diagnostics are suppressed in a SFINAE context.)

While at it, add the diagnosis message "left operand of comma operator has no effect" (used by GCC) for comma operator.

This also makes Clang diagnose in the constant evaluation context which aligns with GCC/MSVC behavior. (https://godbolt.org/z/7zxb8Tx96)

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103938
2021-09-28 10:00:15 -07:00
Yuanfang Chen 59337263ab Revert "Diagnose -Wunused-value based on CFG reachability"
This reverts commit cbbf2e8c8a.
It seems causing diagnoses in SFINAE context.
2021-09-23 11:12:00 -07:00
Yuanfang Chen cbbf2e8c8a Diagnose -Wunused-value based on CFG reachability
While at it, add the diagnosis message "left operand of comma operator has no effect" (used by GCC) for comma operator.

This also makes Clang diagnose in the constant evaluation context which aligns with GCC/MSVC behavior. (https://godbolt.org/z/7zxb8Tx96)

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103938
2021-09-22 14:38:06 -07:00
Aaron Ballman 73a8bcd789 Revert "Diagnose -Wunused-value based on CFG reachability"
This reverts commit 63e0d038fc.

It causes test failures:

http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/119/builds/5612
https://logs.chromium.org/logs/fuchsia/buildbucket/cr-buildbucket/8835548361443044001/+/u/clang/test/stdout
2021-09-21 12:25:13 -04:00
Yuanfang Chen 63e0d038fc Diagnose -Wunused-value based on CFG reachability
While at it, add the diagnosis message "left operand of comma operator has no effect" (used by GCC) for comma operator.

This also makes Clang diagnose in the constant evaluation context which aligns with GCC/MSVC behavior. (https://godbolt.org/z/7zxb8Tx96)

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103938
2021-09-20 10:43:34 -07:00
Aaron Ballman fb6deeb984 Refactor the way we handle diagnosing unused expression results.
Rather than sprinkle calls to DiagnoseUnusedExprResult() around in places where we want diagnostics, we now diagnose unused expression statements and full expressions in a more generic way when acting on the final expression statement. This results in more appropriate diagnostics for [[nodiscard]] where we were previously lacking them, such as when the body of a for loop is not a compound statement.

This patch fixes PR39837.

llvm-svn: 350404
2019-01-04 16:58:14 +00:00
Alex Lorenz 24a1bedf76 [Preprocessor] Fix incorrect token caching that occurs when lexing _Pragma
in macro argument pre-expansion mode when skipping a function body

This commit fixes a token caching problem that currently occurs when clang is
skipping a function body (e.g. when looking for a code completion token) and at
the same time caching the tokens for _Pragma when lexing it in macro argument
pre-expansion mode.

When _Pragma is being lexed in macro argument pre-expansion mode, it caches the
tokens so that it can avoid interpreting the pragma immediately (as the macro
argument may not be used in the macro body), and then either backtracks over or
commits these tokens. The problem is that, when we're backtracking/committing in
such a scenario, there's already a previous backtracking position stored in
BacktrackPositions (as we're skipping the function body), and this leads to a
situation where the cached tokens from the pragma (like '(' 'string_literal'
and ')') will remain in the cached tokens array incorrectly even after they're
consumed (in the case of backtracking) or just ignored (in the case when they're
committed). Furthermore, what makes it even worse, is that because of a previous
backtracking position, the logic that deals with when should we call
ExitCachingLexMode in CachingLex no longer works for us in this situation, and
more tokens in the macro argument get cached, to the point where the EOF token
that corresponds to the macro argument EOF is cached. This problem leads to all
sorts of issues in code completion mode, where incorrect errors get presented
and code completion completely fails to produce completion results.

rdar://28523863

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28772

llvm-svn: 296140
2017-02-24 17:45:16 +00:00