For this patch, a simple search was performed for patterns where there are
two types (usually an LHS and an RHS) which are structurally the same, and there
is some result type which is resolved as either one of them (typically LHS for
consistency).
We change those cases to resolve as the common sugared type between those two,
utilizing the new infrastructure created for this purpose.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111509
For this patch, a simple search was performed for patterns where there are
two types (usually an LHS and an RHS) which are structurally the same, and there
is some result type which is resolved as either one of them (typically LHS for
consistency).
We change those cases to resolve as the common sugared type between those two,
utilizing the new infrastructure created for this purpose.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111509
For this patch, a simple search was performed for patterns where there are
two types (usually an LHS and an RHS) which are structurally the same, and there
is some result type which is resolved as either one of them (typically LHS for
consistency).
We change those cases to resolve as the common sugared type between those two,
utilizing the new infrastructure created for this purpose.
Depends on D111283
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111509
This adds -no-opaque-pointers to clang tests whose output will
change when opaque pointers are enabled by default. This is
intended to be part of the migration approach described in
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/enabling-opaque-pointers-by-default/61322/9.
The patch has been produced by replacing %clang_cc1 with
%clang_cc1 -no-opaque-pointers for tests that fail with opaque
pointers enabled. Worth noting that this doesn't cover all tests,
there's a remaining ~40 tests not using %clang_cc1 that will need
a followup change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123115
A significant number of our tests in C accidentally use functions
without prototypes. This patch converts the function signatures to have
a prototype for the situations where the test is not specific to K&R C
declarations. e.g.,
void func();
becomes
void func(void);
This is the tenth batch of tests being updated (there are a
significant number of other tests left to be updated).
C requires the operands of arithmetic expressions to be promoted if
their types are smaller than an int. Ubsan emits overflow checks when
this sort of type promotion occurs, even if there is no way to actually
get an overflow with the promoted type.
This patch teaches clang how to omit the superflous overflow checks
(addressing PR20193).
Testing: check-clang and check-ubsan.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29369
llvm-svn: 296213
Introduce the following -fsanitize-recover flags:
- -fsanitize-recover=<list>: Enable recovery for selected checks or
group of checks. It is forbidden to explicitly list unrecoverable
sanitizers here (that is, "address", "unreachable", "return").
- -fno-sanitize-recover=<list>: Disable recovery for selected checks or
group of checks.
- -f(no-)?sanitize-recover is now a synonym for
-f(no-)?sanitize-recover=undefined,integer and will soon be deprecated.
These flags are parsed left to right, and mask of "recoverable"
sanitizer is updated accordingly, much like what we do for -fsanitize= flags.
-fsanitize= and -fsanitize-recover= flag families are independent.
CodeGen change: If there is a single UBSan handler function, responsible
for implementing multiple checks, which have different recoverable setting,
then we emit two handler calls instead of one:
the first one for the set of "unrecoverable" checks, another one - for
set of "recoverable" checks. If all checks implemented by a handler have the
same recoverability setting, then the generated code will be the same.
llvm-svn: 225719
Nikita Popov