It doesn't matter which value we use for dead args, so let's switch
to poison, so we can eventually kill undef.
Reviewed By: aeubanks, fhahn
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125983
The re-apply includes fixes to clang tests that were missed in
the original commit.
Original message:
Prior to this patch we would only set to undef the unused arguments of the
external functions. The rationale was that unused arguments of internal
functions wouldn't need to be turned into undef arguments because they
should have been simply eliminated by the time we reach that code.
This is actually not true because there are plenty of cases where we can't
remove unused arguments. For instance, if the internal function is used in
an indirect call, it may not be possible to change the function signature.
Yet, for statically known call-sites we would still like to mark the unused
arguments as undef.
This patch enables the "set undef arguments" optimization on internal
functions when we encounter cases where internal functions cannot be
optimized. I.e., whenever an internal function is marked "live".
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124699
C89 had a questionable feature where the compiler would implicitly
declare a function that the user called but was never previously
declared. The resulting function would be globally declared as
extern int func(); -- a function without a prototype which accepts zero
or more arguments.
C99 removed support for this questionable feature due to severe
security concerns. However, there was no deprecation period; C89 had
the feature, C99 didn't. So Clang (and GCC) both supported the
functionality as an extension in C99 and later modes.
C2x no longer supports that function signature as it now requires all
functions to have a prototype, and given the known security issues with
the feature, continuing to support it as an extension is not tenable.
This patch changes the diagnostic behavior for the
-Wimplicit-function-declaration warning group depending on the language
mode in effect. We continue to warn by default in C89 mode (due to the
feature being dangerous to use). However, because this feature will not
be supported in C2x mode, we've diagnosed it as being invalid for so
long, the security concerns with the feature, and the trivial
workaround for users (declare the function), we now default the
extension warning to an error in C99-C17 mode. This still gives users
an easy workaround if they are extensively using the extension in those
modes (they can disable the warning or use -Wno-error to downgrade the
error), but the new diagnostic makes it more clear that this feature is
not supported and should be avoided. In C2x mode, we no longer allow an
implicit function to be defined and treat the situation the same as any
other lookup failure.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122983
This adds -no-opaque-pointers to clang tests whose output will
change when opaque pointers are enabled by default. This is
intended to be part of the migration approach described in
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/enabling-opaque-pointers-by-default/61322/9.
The patch has been produced by replacing %clang_cc1 with
%clang_cc1 -no-opaque-pointers for tests that fail with opaque
pointers enabled. Worth noting that this doesn't cover all tests,
there's a remaining ~40 tests not using %clang_cc1 that will need
a followup change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123115
A significant number of our tests in C accidentally use functions
without prototypes. This patch converts the function signatures to have
a prototype for the situations where the test is not specific to K&R C
declarations. e.g.,
void func();
becomes
void func(void);
This is the tenth batch of tests being updated (there are a
significant number of other tests left to be updated).
Turning on `enable_noundef_analysis` flag allows better codegen by removing freeze instructions.
I modified clang by renaming `enable_noundef_analysis` flag to `disable-noundef-analysis` and turning it off by default.
Test updates are made as a separate patch: D108453
Reviewed By: eugenis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105169
Turning on `enable_noundef_analysis` flag allows better codegen by removing freeze instructions.
I modified clang by renaming `enable_noundef_analysis` flag to `disable-noundef-analysis` and turning it off by default.
Test updates are made as a separate patch: D108453
Reviewed By: eugenis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105169
[Clang/Test]: Rename enable_noundef_analysis to disable-noundef-analysis and turn it off by default (2)
This patch updates test files after D105169.
Autogenerated test codes are changed by `utils/update_cc_test_checks.py,` and non-autogenerated test codes are changed as follows:
(1) I wrote a python script that (partially) updates the tests using regex: {F18594904} The script is not perfect, but I believe it gives hints about which patterns are updated to have `noundef` attached.
(2) The remaining tests are updated manually.
Reviewed By: eugenis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108453
Resolve lit failures in clang after 8ca4b3e's land
Fix lit test failures in clang-ppc* and clang-x64-windows-msvc
Fix missing failures in clang-ppc64be* and retry fixing clang-x64-windows-msvc
Fix internal_clone(aarch64) inline assembly
Turning on `enable_noundef_analysis` flag allows better codegen by removing freeze instructions.
I modified clang by renaming `enable_noundef_analysis` flag to `disable-noundef-analysis` and turning it off by default.
Test updates are made as a separate patch: D108453
Reviewed By: eugenis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105169
This patch updates test files after D105169.
Autogenerated test codes are changed by `utils/update_cc_test_checks.py,` and non-autogenerated test codes are changed as follows:
(1) I wrote a python script that (partially) updates the tests using regex: {F18594904} The script is not perfect, but I believe it gives hints about which patterns are updated to have `noundef` attached.
(2) The remaining tests are updated manually.
Reviewed By: eugenis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108453
The exisiting code goes out of its way to put block parameters into an
alloca only at -O0, and then describes the funciton argument with a
dbg.declare, which is undocumented in the LLVM-CFE contract and does
not actually behave as intended after LLVM r642022.
This patch just generates the alloca unconditionally, the mem2reg pass
will eliminate it at -O1 and up anyway and points the dbg.declare to
the alloca as intended (which mem2reg will then correctly rewrite into
a dbg.value).
This reapplies r316684 with some dead code removed.
rdar://problem/35043980
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39305
llvm-svn: 316689
The exisiting code goes out of its way to put block parameters into an
alloca only at -O0, and then describes the funciton argument with a
dbg.declare, which is undocumented in the LLVM-CFE contract and does
not actually behave as intended after LLVM r642022.
This patch just generates the alloca unconditionally, the mem2reg pass
will eliminate it at -O1 and up anyway and points the dbg.declare to
the alloca as intended (which mem2reg will then correctly rewrite into
a dbg.value).
rdar://problem/35043980
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39305
llvm-svn: 316684
Nikita Popov