Commit Graph

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Aaron Ballman adc402bf3d Use functions with prototypes when appropriate; NFC
A significant number of our tests in C accidentally use functions
without prototypes. This patch converts the function signatures to have
a prototype for the situations where the test is not specific to K&R C
declarations. e.g.,

  void func();

becomes

  void func(void);

This is the eleventh batch of tests being updated (there are a
significant number of other tests left to be updated).
2022-02-15 16:06:43 -05:00
Nico Weber a11d27f4ff [clang] Try to fix test after ae98182cf7
The test assumes an integrated assembler, so use a triple where
that's the default.
2021-11-17 14:30:08 -05:00
Nico Weber b1ad813b47 [clang] Address review comments on https://reviews.llvm.org/D113707
- Drop a needless `l` size suffix on a mov instruction in AT&T mode
- Move varying bits of test flags to front
- Add a comment about MS mode test
2021-11-17 14:04:16 -05:00
Nico Weber ae98182cf7 [clang] Make -masm=intel affect inline asm style
With this,

  void f() {  __asm__("mov eax, ebx"); }

now compiles with clang with -masm=intel.

This matches gcc.

The flag is not accepted in clang-cl mode. It has no effect on
MSVC-style `__asm {}` blocks, which are unconditionally in intel
mode both before and after this change.

One difference to gcc is that in clang, inline asm strings are
"local" while they're "global" in gcc. Building the following with
-masm=intel works with clang, but not with gcc where the ".att_syntax"
from the 2nd __asm__() is in effect until file end (or until a
".intel_syntax" somewhere later in the file):

  __asm__("mov eax, ebx");
  __asm__(".att_syntax\nmovl %ebx, %eax");
  __asm__("mov eax, ebx");

This also updates clang's intrinsic headers to work both in
-masm=att (the default) and -masm=intel modes.
The official solution for this according to "Multiple assembler dialects in asm
templates" in gcc docs->Extensions->Inline Assembly->Extended Asm
is to write every inline asm snippet twice:

    bt{l %[Offset],%[Base] | %[Base],%[Offset]}

This works in LLVM after D113932 and D113894, so use that.

(Just putting `.att_syntax` at the start of the snippet works in some but not
all cases: When LLVM interpolates in parameters like `%0`, it uses at&t or
intel syntax according to the inline asm snippet's flavor, so the `.att_syntax`
within the snippet happens to late: The interpolated-in parameter is already
in intel style, and then won't parse in the switched `.att_syntax`.)

It might be nice to invent a `#pragma clang asm_dialect push "att"` /
`#pragma clang asm_dialect pop` to be able to force asm style per snippet,
so that the inline asm string doesn't contain the same code in two variants,
but let's leave that for a follow-up.

Fixes PR21401 and PR20241.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113707
2021-11-17 13:41:59 -05:00